Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Did Dean lie when he said the Confederate Flag comment was about race?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Politics/Campaigns Donate to DU
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-03 12:11 AM
Original message
Did Dean lie when he said the Confederate Flag comment was about race?
I doubt it but will, unlike certain DU Dean bashers, admit the article is too poorly written to tell.

First, here is the link to the article.

http://www.dmregister.com/news/stories/c4789004/22649906.html

Here is the confederate flag quote and the paragraphs immediately after.

Start of quote

"I still want to be the candidate for guys with Confederate flags in their pickup trucks," Dean said Friday in a telephone interview from New Hampshire. "We can't beat George Bush unless we appeal to a broad cross-section of Democrats."

Dean said he answered the questionnaire while running for re-election as governor of Vermont. He has said he was never asked to sign a gun control bill during his Vermont tenure.

Dean often touts his high rating from the NRA, which he attributes to Vermont's scant gun restrictions, low crime rate and tradition as a hunting mecca.

end of quote

Clearly both the underlined quote and the italicized text come from the phone call. We know that due to it being mentioned in the first paragraph and no other citation being mentioned. But note that only the underlined is quoted material. No one believes Dean only said the underline words in that phone call (in point of fact if he did then my case would be made since not one word about guns is underlined). But we have no idea when he said the quoted words and in what manner he expressed the paraphrased idea (italics).

Equally clearly he didn't mention the bold paragraph's idea in the phone call since the word often is used. I think we can agree that the reporter isn't saying Dean often said during the phone call that Vermont has scant gun restrictions etc. So now the source is assumed to be different.

start of quote two

Dean said he wanted to protect hunters' rights to use semiautomatic hunting rifles in Vermont. But the question about the ban referred both to federal and state law.

Former Democratic state Sen. Elizabeth Ready of Vermont said Dean's position on guns was the same as the vast majority of Democrats in Vermont.

The only gun control bill introduced in Vermont during Dean's 11 years as governor died before it was debated, according to chief Vermont Legislative Counsel Bill Russell.

"People have to understand hunting is part of Vermont's cultural fabric," said Ready, a liberal Democrat who also opposed the bill.

When asked about his position on guns on the campaign trail, Dean said he supports a 1993 federal law requiring that handgun purchases be subject to a waiting period for federal background checks.

He also backs a measure that would require purchases at gun shows be accorded the same checks. Beyond that, gun control should be up to individual states, he said.

end of quote two

Paragraph one is not a quote. It also isn't directly attributed to the phone call. Given the standard rules of citation the fact the source was switched and not switched back implies a different source. Though to be fair it could be from the call as well. We simply don't know. And we certainly don't know where in relation to the first quote this came if it even is in that phone call.

Paragraphs two through four aren't Dean speaking. No mention was made of this being a conference call or joint phone interview. It is an eminately reasonable assumption that these paragraphs are completely divorced from the phone interview. And that any subsequent citations are not from that phone interview unless explicitly noted.

Paragraphs five and six are explicitly cited as coming from the campaign trail. There is no way we can assume any connection what so ever to that phone interview.

start of quote 3

"I support the assault weapons ban and the reauthorization of the assault weapons ban," Dean said. "I just don't think we should have laws over and above the existing laws. If you show me a new federal gun control law that saves lives, I'll support it. But, frankly, I'm skeptical of that."

end of quote 3

This is the last quote or paraphrase of Dean in the entire article. It is right where quote 2 leaves off. Clearly this quote comes from somewhere. Maybe it comes from the phone call. But under standard rules it is supposed to be assumed it comes from the campaign trail since that is the last source presented.

There are several problems with this piece and the style this reporter chose to write it in. He was exceedingly sloppy with his quotes and attributing them. He didn't give any description of the phone interview. Was it only about guns as some DUer's think or was it more broad ranging? Was it short, medium length, or long? These are important things to know. Was it with the reporter writing this piece? If not with whom was it? Why are we not given a link to it?

Clearly it is possilbe this was an interview only about guns and Dean used the Confederate Flag quote in it. But that leaves some pretty obvious questions. Why no mention of gun racks or hunting? Why is the first part of the quote (about the flag) broken from the second part (about the broad cross section of Democrats)? Why no mention of guns in that quote?

Clearly it is also possible this was a wide ranging interview in which Dean discussed many different things. Including guns and the confederate flag. This also leaves some questions. Why would a reporter take a Dean quote out of context for his gun article? I will let the expert take that one. www.dailyhowler.com www.mediahorseonline.com to take two expert opinions on the behavior of the press in regards to Democrats.

Of the two senarios I find the second far more likely given the fact he has used the analogy before and it has always been about race and not guns. But even conceeding them to be equally likely before we call candidates liars we should be making sure that only that option remains. Those bashing DUers didn't do that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-03 12:20 AM
Response to Original message
1. Let's see...the ENTIRE article was about the NRA and gun control....
and Dean's comment about the flag was in defense of his longtime NRA support, and race relations is not mentioned in the article at all....so I must conclude that you're right....I'm sure he was trying to start a discussion about race relations.

Shame.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-03 12:31 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. the article yes
But isn't it just possible that this reporter to a quote from the phone interview and plugged into his article even if it didn't match. No reporters never, ever do that. Never, ever does that happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mbali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-08-03 04:29 PM
Response to Reply #3
39. It's possible
but that's a stretch, especially considering that the most logical conclusion is that Dean was talking about the subject of the article - especially since Dean has not uttered a peep in protest at being misquoted or quoted out of context.

Why is it so difficult for Dean's supporters to EVER admit that just maybe, their guy isn't perfect?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xxqqqzme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-03 12:26 AM
Response to Original message
2. hasn't this subject been
done to death?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-03 12:32 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. By the time I got to post in that thread
two things were clear. One my post was well over the hundredth and people were claiming we hadn't answered. Take it up with those people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LuminousX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-03 12:35 AM
Response to Original message
5. I find my answer in Dean's speech in Florida
"Guns, God, race, and gays..."

It all is tied together for Dean. When talking with a reporter who is asking about all sorts of things, how can he distill one element from the rest?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-03 12:39 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. In fairness I have no idea
how wide ranging that interview was. The reporter didn't bother to tell us which is one of my basic points.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dajabr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-03 12:56 AM
Response to Reply #5
10. We have a winner!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-03 07:13 PM
Response to Reply #5
31. Exactly!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Fer cripes sakes!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nicholas_J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-03 12:45 AM
Response to Original message
7. Was his mouth moving?
Seriously. Dean was in my city a few days ago, and in a city with a population of almost a million, with another million living within a 90 minute drive, Dean had about 100 people show up to his fund raiser/introduce Howard Dean to the people meeting.

And most of those were not locals. Dean's reception locally for the most part was chilly, and only one elected Democratic official showed up at this meeting, and she sis not directl endorse Dean but his supporters took her normally charming nature and quotes (she is like that with virtaully all democrats she meets, as tacit endorsesment.)

I decided to go to verify what I have always beleived about Deans so called large support in areas, and found that most of the cars in the lot at the hotel and surrounding parking areas were out of state, or from in this state from as far as 6 1/2 hour drives. Alabama, South Carolina Georgia, were the other states, and cars from other counties in the south abnd central florida areas were there with Dean stickers as well.

The local stations just barely covered Dean, only one gave a brief five second blurb eith him speaking and all cut into Democratic Party consulatants who have nothing to do with any of the other candidates basically said that even if Dean's messagewas meant to be desiged to unite the party, what he did was a major error, and was morev divisive than uniting, many thought that this was simply an attempt on Deans part to pull candidates away from those they currently support by using negative tactics. And that it is odd that with all of the other statemetns that Dean made that were even worse in the past, this one may cause him far more problems even though it was more innocuous than his doing things like insinuating that Bob Graham was too old to be running, and his statements about medicare, which no matter how much Dean supporters think was innocuous and now hew has eveolved out of it, are deeply distrusted by the retireees who have heard them. Beleive me, closer to January, they will be reminded again about Denas medicare and social security statements with new quotes from the time he was governor, and his being evasive about other federal entitlements that the elderly benefit from which he has still "LEFT ON THE TABLE"

There were over three million people within a three hour drive of Deans appearance in Florida and only a hundred showed up in this city.


I dont think Dean can cut into either Lieberman or Kerrys support base here, as Kerry is very very strong with young working professionals, Lieberman with the older retiree's, and the elderly and blacks were Grahams strongest support here for all the years he was in office. MOst of the elected Democratic officials in my area are black, and only one showed up at Deans appearance here. Very very few in the audience were black, very few retirees or getting ready to retire.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
a_lil_wall_fly Donating Member (404 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-03 02:41 AM
Response to Reply #7
15. Wow
That is very scary for Dean since FL is a major state in the overall picture.
With his "bad writing and researching" and the odd statements from various sites about his "clouded" pass as the former governor of VT with issues of medicare and minority issues in education--no wonder why Dr. HD is having problems down there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-03 02:48 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Feanorcurufinwe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-03 12:48 AM
Response to Original message
8. Wassa matter, were you losing the argument in the original thread?
lol

:P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-03 12:49 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. No but I used to have dial up
and wanted those who have it to see my post.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
billbuckhead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-03 01:00 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. Dean used the Confederate flag on that truck because he was scared if he
Edited on Fri Nov-07-03 01:08 AM by billbuckhead
put a NRA one on there in case his views might be confused with NRA board members Ted Nugent or Grover Norquist. Even thought for months Dean sounded like a new improved Charlton Heston Kulturwar stand-in looking out for those white guys with guns.(though he does look a bit like George Wallace especially when he's pointing his finger) Dean probably thought about it and decided the ConFLag was less controversial than an NRA decal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemBones DemBones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-03 01:39 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. Thus showing he didn't learn much by rooming with black guys at

Yale. ("Dean probably thought about it and decided the ConFLag was less controversial than an NRA decal.") It may be less controversial to his white base (after all, Dean supporters here are defending not only his mention of the flag but the flag itself and how right it would be to include those "guys with pick-up trucks, etc.," in our party. (I've been really surprised by that, given all the South-bashing threads we've had at DU over the years. I never thought I'd see support for "Rebel flag-waving cretins" here.)

But what about the many many black Democrats? How much longer will they put up with being treated as people who have nowhere else to go, politically?

Now Dean's attacked Jeb Bush over the Terri Schiavo case. Attacking Jeb is good but doing it over the Schiavo case shows a lack of understanding of what disability rights groups want, a lack of caring about the disabled.

And telling people in Jacksonville, Florida, that Southerners have to stop basing their votes on "race, guns, God, and gays"? He must be trying to make people mad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
billbuckhead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-03 01:46 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. He's playing to his base to raise money.
When Bush does something that doesn't make sense, it's usually an oil scam. When Dean does something goofy nowdays it's about raising money. Listen to his fans. He makes them mad about the way the world ought to be. He plays Dean Quixote for his fans like a vituoso and they throw their cash.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Padraig18 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-03 12:54 PM
Response to Reply #13
28. We do throw cash.
Far more than anyone else, too.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
a_lil_wall_fly Donating Member (404 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-03 02:36 AM
Response to Original message
14. Dean should fire his entire research and writing staff
For the insane lil things that he has stated that has gotten some much flack about....if not he will keep get a lot of grief over lil thing he says.

And for you Deanites will have to deal with the sniping here on the DU for it.

:o
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-03 03:42 AM
Response to Original message
17. Sharpton attacked him
This one doesn't matter to me. Sharpton attacked him on race and Dean responded. Gep, Edwards and Kerry attacked as well. It was probably very confusing. This is just no big deal.

But, just because somebody disagrees with me or you doesn't make them a bashing DUer. It makes them somebody with a difference of opinion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-03 07:23 AM
Response to Reply #17
18. The thread was entitled Dean lied . . .
and I just got done showing that they proved no such thing. That counts as bashing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-03 11:02 AM
Response to Reply #18
20. Dean was not talking about race when he made the remark. HE LIED
Edited on Fri Nov-07-03 11:04 AM by blm
about WHY he made the remark and all the evidence proves that he was talking about his NRA support and NONE of the evidence points to race relations. Race relations is NEVER mentioned in an article about Dean's NRA support. NONE.

YOU are bashing me by sayiong that I put up a false post when there are ZERO inaccuracies in that post. ZERO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Padraig18 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-03 11:08 AM
Response to Reply #20
22. Stick. Dead horse. Beat. Repeat.
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-03 12:22 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
LuminousX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-03 12:24 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. Mmmm Kool-Aid
:bounce: :beer: :bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helleborient Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-03 12:25 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. Especially the purple kind! (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Padraig18 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-03 12:27 PM
Response to Reply #23
26. My reply was to you, not dsc. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-03 09:04 AM
Response to Original message
19. The Confederate flag issue in South Carolina is about race
despite what some say because the flag wasn't put on state property in the 1800's, but was put there during the civil rights era when civil rights legislation was the issue there. Some there may think its about heritage, but the timing of its placement there indicates a different reality.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jerryster Donating Member (685 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-03 12:46 PM
Response to Reply #19
27. You got it right
You hit that nail on the head. Dean could have said he wanted to appeal to all voters without even mentioning the confederate flag. That flag symbolizes slavery and all its ills. One thing that hasn't been mentioned in this thread is the reaction African American voters may have to Dean's remarks. Yes, he is correct to want to appeal to a broad base. But if he appears to embrace people who embrace that despicable symbol African Americans will stay home in even greater numbers than 2000. And if that happens, no matter who the nominee is for us, WE LOSE!! I have said before and I will say again, the candidates are on the NATIONAL stage. They are going to have every word scrutinized so they need to be mindful of what they say.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Padraig18 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-03 11:07 AM
Response to Original message
21. Stick. Dead horse. Beat. Repeat.
Edited on Fri Nov-07-03 11:07 AM by Padraig18
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-03 07:04 PM
Response to Reply #21
29. I realize I may seem
petty and overzealous at times. But Bush is in the White House in no small part because his supporters let leftists distort his record. Not again, not on my watch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Padraig18 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-03 07:06 PM
Response to Reply #29
30. I know.
I think we all know that the Mayberry Machiavelli is going to savage whoever we nominate; I just get sorta tired of seeing this stuff. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-03 07:14 PM
Response to Reply #29
32. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Padraig18 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-03 07:22 PM
Response to Reply #32
33. Stick. Dead horse. Beat. Repeat.
Edited on Fri Nov-07-03 07:23 PM by Padraig18
Come on--- this is the second day on that pseudo-issue; the world has continued to spin, and things have happened since then, ya know? :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Feanorcurufinwe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-08-03 01:05 PM
Response to Reply #29
36. Bush is in the WH because he distorts his own record. Just like Dean.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-08-03 03:53 PM
Response to Reply #36
37. With all due respect
just what press coverage did you read in 2k. Mine featured "Al is the biggest liar in history" stories for a year and a half. There was Love Story, Love Canal, Buddist temples, union lullabies, Occidental stock, and God alone knows what else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Feanorcurufinwe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-08-03 04:08 PM
Response to Reply #37
38. Bush is a liar. Bush is a phony. Bush is happy to lie about himself
Edited on Sat Nov-08-03 04:11 PM by Feanorcurufinwe
and his opponent. He has absolutely no shame or sense of decency

I heard a story on the radio last night. They were interviewing voters in Lehigh Valley, PA. One Bush supporter was talking about 'I see Bush riding his horse on his ranch... he's a genuine guy.' (not exact quote)

I felt like throwing up. Actually I was in my car and I almost got into an accident. We need to fight lies and deception in public life, not cheer it.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-08-03 04:33 PM
Response to Reply #38
40. I heard the same report
and I hope you heard the first part. That was anything but barf inducing. Bush is losing ground due to the war and the economy. Before that joker was interviewed they intervied a series of people who voted for Bush and sounded very regretful for having done so.

As to your other point. People tend to discount what politicians say but when the press says it they are more likely to believe it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kwolf68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-03 07:25 PM
Response to Original message
34. Rebel flags on pickups

Does anyone with a freaking brainwave really believe we can construct a coalition that includes bonafide rednecks and progressives?

Everything I-as a progressive-stand for is directly contradicted by these guys who fly the rebel flag on their truck?

I can't wait to see if Howard D gets the nomination...Man, I hope he does so the goddamn NRA will STILL NOT SUPPORT HIM and will support Bush, which ONCE AND FOR ALL should put to rest the silly notion that the NRA is anything but completely right-wing.

If we begin to placate to these right-wing dunderheads, the Liberals and progressives will just beg out of the race.

I admire Dean's desire to gain ground with some in the middle, but the "Hillbilly Vote" isn't what we should be fighting for...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Padraig18 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-03 07:29 PM
Response to Reply #34
35. "Hillbilly vote"
A rather elitist and condescending remark. And why shouldn't we court their vote?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Feanorcurufinwe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-09-03 04:40 PM
Response to Original message
41. This reporter isn't confused about what Dean was talking about.

According to Andrew Arulanandam, director of public affairs for the NRA, Dean was endorsed by the group in three of his five gubernatorial elections: 1994, 1996 and 1998. In 1992 and 2000, Dean received a top shelf "A" rating from the NRA but was not endorsed.

Like Kerry, Arulanandam said Dean's support for the assault weapons ban isn't in sync with his stance as governor.

"Clearly it's inconsistent," Arulanandam said.

Kerry's attacks were spawned by Dean's recent remark about the Confederate flag, a comment the governor made in defending his position on guns. Dean said the Democratic Party needs to court Southerners with Confederate flags in their pickup trucks. Earlier this week, Dean said he regretted the remark and apologized.
http://www.cmonitor.com/stories/news/state2003/kerry_on_crime_2003.shtml

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-09-03 04:51 PM
Response to Reply #41
42. And just how would she know?
She has no links to or quotes from that interview. I have looked for that interview on the Register website and it isn't there. No stories about it are save the one that is in this thread. I did find out, from a different story, that the interview was given to the author of the piece in this thread so I emailed him with questions and have gotten no response. But I fail to see how this reporter you have quoted would have any more idea what the interview was about than I would. She sites no sources at all to indicate she has any more knowledge then either of us have.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-09-03 04:56 PM
Response to Reply #42
43. My spouse works in a newsroom.
I'll see if I can get an email response from the reporter who interviewed Dean for the story. If he emails back, then I'll post it.

Maybe others with newsroom connex can do the same. They might be able to cut through some red tape or barriers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-09-03 05:19 PM
Response to Reply #43
45. Thanks
In the reporter's defence my email to him wasn't until pretty late on Friday so he may have yet to see it. I didn't read the second article which stated the interview was a Register interview until then and I also didn't figure out that the name of the reporter linked the email until then. If you can get answers where I couldn't great.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Feanorcurufinwe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-09-03 05:05 PM
Response to Reply #42
44. She'd know because she read the original story and she's not an idiot
or a shill for Dean.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-09-03 05:21 PM
Response to Reply #44
46. Please point out where
in that story the interview is characterized in any way, shape, or form.

Please point to where we see any question asked to Dean by that reporter.

Please point to where we see either the interview called a conference call or some other source for the comments from the other Vermonters.

Until those questions get answered I think we have no idea what form that interview took and thus can't charcterize it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Feanorcurufinwe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-09-03 05:47 PM
Response to Reply #46
47. It's been pointed out to you repeatedly.Just because you pretend otherwise
Edited on Sun Nov-09-03 05:57 PM by Feanorcurufinwe
changes nothing.



Kerry supported the 1994 bill that outlawed the sale and ownership of assault weapons, which Dean says he now supports.

"Howard Dean, during the time we were trying to pass it, was appealing to the NRA for their support," Kerry said, while visiting a rural Story County farm.

"We don't need to be a party that says we need to be the candidacy of the NRA. We stand up against that."

Dean has said 2000 Democratic nominee Al Gore lost the election because he failed to win Southern states, where disaffected Democrats who favor gun owners' rights were reluctant to support him.

"I still want to be the candidate for guys with Confederate flags in their pickup trucks," Dean said Friday in a telephone interview from New Hampshire. "We can't beat George Bush unless we appeal to a broad cross-section of Democrats."

Dean said he answered the questionnaire while running for re-election as governor of Vermont. He has said he was never asked to sign a gun control bill during his Vermont tenure.

Dean often touts his high rating from the NRA, which he attributes to Vermont's scant gun restrictions, low crime rate and tradition as a hunting mecca.
http://www.dmregister.com/news/stories/c4789004/22649906.html



Howard Dean's rivals for the Democratic nomination roundly attacked him on Saturday for telling an Iowa newspaper he wanted "to be the candidate for guys with Confederate flags in their pickup trucks" in defending his opposition to some gun control legislation.
http://www.nytimes.com/2003/11/02/politics/campaigns/02DEAN.html?ex=1068354000&en=31807d02d3911de5&ei=5062



Dean’s comment was reported in story about Kerry’s criticism of Dean’s record on guns. The senator claimed that Dean was an NRA favorite who opposed a 1994 law that banned assault weapons to civilians.

“I would rather be the candidate of the NAACP than the NRA,” Kerry said in a statement.

Candidate and civil rights activist Al Sharpton – who has accused Dean of having an “anti-black agenda” – said he was “surprised and disturbed” by the Confederate flag remark. “If I said I wanted to be the candidate for people that ride around with helmets and swastikas, I would be asked to leave,” Sharpton said.
http://nashuatelegraph.com/Main.asp?SectionID=25&SubSectionID=379&ArticleID=92608



Like Kerry, Arulanandam said Dean's support for the assault weapons ban isn't in sync with his stance as governor.

"Clearly it's inconsistent," Arulanandam said.

Kerry's attacks were spawned by Dean's recent remark about the Confederate flag, a comment the governor made in defending his position on guns. Dean said the Democratic Party needs to court Southerners with Confederate flags in their pickup trucks. Earlier this week, Dean said he regretted the remark and apologized.
http://www.cmonitor.com/stories/news/state2003/kerry_on_crime_2003.shtml


Still, the gun and flag comments were clearly on the minds of some voters, all of them women, who came to hear Lofgren on Monday.

One woman asked about Dean’s position on gun control while another held up a newspaper clipping detailing the dispute over Dean’s Confederate flag comment.
http://www.qctimes.com/internal.php?story_id=1019963&l=1&t=Nation+%2F+World&c=26,1019963



Defending his record on guns, Dean recently told a newspaper that he wanted to be "the candidate for guys with Confederate flags in their pickup trucks." He has since apologized.
http://www.bayarea.com/mld/mercurynews/news/politics/7222168.htm




What's the matter with all these people? How odd that they would all misunderstand Dean the same way.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-09-03 06:07 PM
Response to Reply #47
48. Let me try this again
In the one and only article, from the one and only person who actually has conducted the interview in question, please site where that interview is in any way, shape, or form charcterized as being about guns and only guns. All of the other people you quote have not seen, heard, or read the interview. I want a quote from the person who did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Feanorcurufinwe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-09-03 06:15 PM
Response to Reply #48
49. Let me try this again.
Edited on Sun Nov-09-03 06:18 PM by Feanorcurufinwe
I understand that you, an ardent Dean supporter, believe that this is not what it appears to be, but rather, it is what Dean says it is.

A challenge you to prove to me that Cheney and his cronies only talked about energy policy. Prove they were not secretly planning the ascendency of Howard Dean! Please cite where it says they talked only about energy policy. I want a qoute.




Kerry supported the 1994 bill that outlawed the sale and ownership of assault weapons, which Dean says he now supports.

"Howard Dean, during the time we were trying to pass it, was appealing to the NRA for their support," Kerry said, while visiting a rural Story County farm.

"We don't need to be a party that says we need to be the candidacy of the NRA. We stand up against that."

Dean has said 2000 Democratic nominee Al Gore lost the election because he failed to win Southern states, where disaffected Democrats who favor gun owners' rights were reluctant to support him.

"I still want to be the candidate for guys with Confederate flags in their pickup trucks," Dean said Friday in a telephone interview from New Hampshire. "We can't beat George Bush unless we appeal to a broad cross-section of Democrats."

Dean said he answered the questionnaire while running for re-election as governor of Vermont. He has said he was never asked to sign a gun control bill during his Vermont tenure.

Dean often touts his high rating from the NRA, which he attributes to Vermont's scant gun restrictions, low crime rate and tradition as a hunting mecca.
http://www.dmregister.com/news/stories/c4789004/22649906.html




I guess this cartoonist was mixed up when he hung that assault rifle in Dean's pickup:



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-09-03 06:22 PM
Response to Reply #49
50. You may need to reread my first post
My point then, expressed in the very first line, is that it is possible Dean was only talking about guns but also possible he wasn't.

For the record here is the exact quote.

Did Dean lie when he said the Confederate Flag comment was about race?


I doubt it but will, unlike certain DU Dean bashers, admit the article is too poorly written to tell.




If you have such problem reading, comprehending, and honestly reporting my words why should I trust your interpretation of anyone else's?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Feanorcurufinwe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-09-03 08:00 PM
Response to Reply #50
51. I understand how you've justified it to yourself.
Just because I understand your reasoning doesn't make your argument reasonable. You are welcome to believe what you believe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Nov 03rd 2024, 06:59 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Politics/Campaigns Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC