Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Kerry made it to the front page of Yahoo...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Politics/Campaigns Donate to DU
 
Meshuga Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 08:38 AM
Original message
Kerry made it to the front page of Yahoo...
"Those of us who seek the Democratic presidential nomination owe the American people more than just criticism of the Bush foreign policy or anger or piecemeal solutions," Kerry said in excerpts of his address released by the campaign. "We need to convince them that Democrats are responsible stewards of our national security and America's role in the world."

http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/ap/20031203/ap_on_el_pr/democrats_kerry&cid=694&ncid=716
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
phillybri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 09:22 AM
Response to Original message
1. This was a great story, UNTIL...
He said he would appoint James Baker. WHY THE HELL WOULD HE SAY THAT!!!!! Clinton, Carter, BAKER????

That just kills me....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
molly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 10:14 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Let's read it correctly....
"The presidential candidate from Massachusetts, in a speech Wednesday to the Council of Foreign Relations in New York, said there are a handful of people he would consider naming to the post, including former Democratic Presidents Clinton and Carter as well as James Baker, secretary of state in the first Bush White House."

I would hope any logical, thinking presidential candidate would CONSIDER using ANYONE to get us out of our current foreign policy mess.

Let's not let the rage and anger of some candidates - who, BTW, have absolutely NO foreign policy saavy - influence what is good for our country.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LuminousX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 10:33 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Cast aspersions much?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
molly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 10:36 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Your point is?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RevolutionStartsNow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 10:37 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. Okay, I read it correctly
And it's still bad.

James Baker is a major red flag to many of us. I realize that he didn't endorse or appoint Baker, but I would hope that our next president wouldn't even CONSIDER working with someone that offensive.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
molly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 10:39 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. I agree James Baker is offensive
and I basically hate his guts - BUT - I would use any of them to get this country out of the mess it's in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RevolutionStartsNow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 10:42 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. That's the point
Baker was instrumental in getting us INTO this mess, why the F would we ask him to help get us out? If a Dem takes the presidency (okay, WHEN!), the GOP will have their sights set on 2008 and Jeb. Why would we want someone like Baker anywhere near our administration at that point?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
molly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 10:43 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. Remember Nixon and China?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RevolutionStartsNow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 10:58 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. Are you using that to defend James Baker?
Really? Baker = Nixon?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
molly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 11:16 AM
Response to Reply #11
15. You are missing many points.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RevolutionStartsNow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 11:30 AM
Response to Reply #15
18. Oh, please share
But please remember that the real outrage here is about Baker's role in the 2000 selection, so don't forget recent history.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 10:58 AM
Response to Reply #6
12. Baker was in charge of the Bush1 foreign policy Dean said was "excellent."
Edited on Wed Dec-03-03 11:02 AM by blm
I disagree with Kerry that Baker should even be "considered" however you have Dean being applauded here for his Hardball appearance where he praised Colin Powell who he would have for Sec. of State and praising Bush1's foreign policy as "excellent" when it was Baker who handled Bush1's foreign policy ventures.

Why are you all being so hypocritical when Kerry said he'd only "consider" Baker in the interest of bi-partisanship?

Note also that Dean says Powell should have been listened to on Iraq, yet it was Powell who made the case to the Democrats in committee and promised a coalition would be built first and employ full diplomatic measures before use of force.


http://www.msnbc.com/news/1000254.asp

 MATTHEWS: Do you have any confidence that this president is calling the shots?
       DEAN: I think the president does make the last decision. I do think that. I think he gets a lot of advises. The problem is that the people he gets advice from are people he ought to not be paying so much attention to. If he paid more attention to Colin Powell and less attention to Dick-
       Donald Rumsfeld, we wouldn’t be in Iraq right now.
       (APPLAUSE)
       MATTHEWS: Do you think he would be a good secretary of state for you, Colin Powell?
       DEAN: I think he would be a good secretary of state, period. He is a loyal person. He knows, what he is doing. And he has what-let’s get back to the question...
       MATTHEWS: Do you agree with him on foreign policy, Colin Powell?
       DEAN: In many cases I do. I read his books. I like them a lot. You don’t go into a place with no exit strategy. We clearly went into Iraq with not exit strategy.
       Let me answer the question about Kerry’s comments about my foreign policy.
       MATTHEWS: Sure.
       DEAN: Kerry, Gephardt, Lieberman, Edwards and Wes Clark at first, all of us were in favor of this resolution that was a preemptive unilateral attacks on Iraq. I was not. We all had information from the papers. They presumably had some intelligence information, with the exception of Wes, who may have had some or not. He was out of the government by them. I came to a different conclusion because a lot of what is required of a president for foreign policy is judgment and patience. If I came to a different conclusion than they did, given the amount of trouble we’re now in Iraq, given the fact that al Qaeda is in Iraq now and it wasn’t there before, it seems to me that their kind of foreign policy experience is not the kind we want in the White House and mine is.
       

          MATTHEWS: That’s it? You are a cold man.
       George Bush Sr., Herbert Walker Bush?
       DEAN: Excellent on foreign policy. Not to great on domestic policy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RevolutionStartsNow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 11:09 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. After his role in the 2000 fraud,
Baker should be completely off-limits in any Dem administration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 11:19 AM
Response to Reply #13
16. No comment on Dean's hypocrisy or Dean supporters'?
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 06:56 PM
Response to Reply #16
29. Cat got your fingertips?
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RevolutionStartsNow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 07:05 PM
Response to Reply #29
30. Yeah, okay, okay
Edited on Wed Dec-03-03 07:07 PM by Amerikav60
You are asking for a comment on Dean supporters "hypocrisy"? That right?

I personally don't agree with Dean's comments about GHWB's foreign policy, though I think he's trying to draw a contrast to Junior's abysmal foreign policy work.

Baker's role in the 2000 selection raises him to a whole new level of evilness. I think this is where the real disgust is coming from about Kerry's comment. Don't you agree?


Edit: Just noticed that you called Dean a "lying inconsistent fraud" in another post just below this. But yet you want Dean supporters to engage in rational dialogue with you? C'mon...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 07:43 PM
Response to Reply #30
32. Baker did it FOR Poppy or did you think he did it on his own?
Get real.

And maybe Kerry by saying he'd "consider" Baker is saying it to highlight Bush2's failings in the Mideast and get conservatives to think and compare?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RevolutionStartsNow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 08:05 PM
Response to Reply #32
33. Of course he did, I agree with you
Baker bad. Poppy bad. All bad. Don't want them in Dean's or Kerry's administration. Ever.

I don't agree with what Dean said about Poppy, in fact I think Dean was doing exactly what you suggested, trying to highlight the son's miserable foreign policy by putting it in perspective of his father's policies. You stole my argument. :)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
molly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 11:15 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. WOW! I missed that
I was working. It's OK tho because it was the almighty Dean's opinion. Since we have absolutely NO WAY to determine what his Iraq policy would've-could've been, he can say anything he wants and get away with it. His loyal supporters won't even question the almighty Howard Dean.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 12:32 PM
Response to Reply #14
21. Yep. More Dean and Dean supporter hypocrisy.
When will it end? Maybe when the corporate media shames the entire Dem party for having a lying, inconsistent fraud at the top of the ticket while covering up for the other lying, inconsistent fraud who controls the corporate media.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phillybri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 04:26 PM
Response to Reply #2
25. I read the point correctly....
Still, why James Baker (the BFEE's ballwasher)? I'm all for bipartisan cooperation, but how did he come up with Baker???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polpilot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 07:37 PM
Response to Reply #25
31.  Kerry's repubuddy? I want a prez who REFUSES to shake Baker's hand.
Refuses. "No I don't believe I want to shake your hand, Jim. I'm afraid of where it may have been."

Dean '04...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNadir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 09:33 PM
Response to Reply #2
34. How about Jim Bakker, the ex-felon televangelist.
No wait, unindicted war criminal Henry Kissinger. Colin "Cover-up My Lai and that reproduction of Picasso's Guerica" Powell for bipartisan continuity? I know, Dick Cheney, there's a man with international experience. Um...um...is Caspar Weinberger dead? Oliver North?

I mean we wouldn't want a well respected and admired Democrat like Madeline Albright would we?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LuminousX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 10:31 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. I actually liked and respected Baker up until 2000
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 01:24 PM
Response to Reply #3
23. I always despised Baker from when he deregulated the S&L's....
but, I do see paulk's point about Kerry's likely intention here. For those conservatives and moderates who perceived Poppy's foreign policy as "mature" and Junior's policy as "petulant" then this may have been a smart bone to throw, even while I doubt that he has any intention of considering Baker as an envoy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 10:40 AM
Response to Reply #1
8. Note, James Baker's law firm is representing the Saudis against American
victims of 9.11.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 11:27 AM
Response to Reply #8
17. Note, James Baker's foeign policy is "excellent" according to Dean.
Dean did praise Bush1's "excellent" foreign policy on Monday. Well, Baker pushed forth Bush1's foreign policy, didn't he?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paulk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 11:31 AM
Response to Original message
19. There are a lot of people from Poppy's camp, including James Baker,
who aren't real happy with the job Shrub has done with foreign policy.
Poppy, through these people, sent some shots across his kid's bow prior to the invasion - little good it did.

Kerry is sending a subtle message to the old-line conservatives with this. There is a big part of the Republican party leadership who don't like the neocons any better than we do, and Kerry is telling them that, as far as foreign policy is concerned, they're on the same side.

ps - I can't stand James Baker.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 11:41 AM
Response to Reply #19
20. I see what you're saying, and you are probably right...but...
I still hate that he would even throw that Baker bone out there, even if it is smart politics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paulk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 12:38 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. I think some of the criticism of Kerry is justified
as far as him being an "out of touch" insider. He understands how politics works and how you really get things done in Washington, but he seems clueless about how the Democratic electorate out there is reacting to the events of the last few years. This Baker thing is a good example.He doesn't seem to understand the anger out there, and that much of it is directed not only at Bush, but at the Democratic party in general.

The "brilliance" of the Dean campaign is that he has recognized that anger and capitalized on it. So far, Kerry has been unable to deflect Dean or tap into that anger himself.

I fear this may cost, not only the Democrats, but the country itself the person I feel is most qualified to lead us at this time.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 02:25 PM
Response to Original message
24. I am honestly horrified
I keep thinking this is a Kerry joke, it fits his style.

President Clinton, President Carter...
and in the interests of bipartisanship (haha) James Baker. (laughter)

I don't know. I just can't imagine mentioning James Baker's name seriously in conjunction with a Democratic agenda at all. This could really be my deal breaker.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
killbotfactory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 04:54 PM
Response to Original message
26. Kerry is the next Dukakis and is unelectable
He's a wishy-washy, gun grabbing, ivory tower, tax and spend liberal who wants to raise taxes, is weak on defense, and endorses gay marriage.

And now he want's to negotiate with a terrorist sponsoring nation like Iran while we are at war with terrorism? Helloooo 9/11!!!

Try and tell me that's not how Rove will spin it.

If Kerry is elected, Bush will win in a landslide.

This message brought to you by The Democratic Nihilist Coalition (DNC): "The bitter crank wing of the democratic party"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 05:15 PM
Response to Reply #26
27. Good thing Kerry is smart enough to counter it and has a record of BRAVERY
UNDER FIRE.... And relentlessly pursued Reagan and Bush administrations on BCCI, IranContra and CIA drugrunning while being smeared every day in the press.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
killbotfactory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 05:17 PM
Response to Reply #27
28. I'm sorry, but exclusive DNC analysis doens't include the possibility of
a democrat fighting against right wing meme's.

And according to that analysis, Kerry is unelectable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Mar 13th 2025, 03:55 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Politics/Campaigns Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC