Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Charlie Rangel charges Gore with polarizing the campaign

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Politics/Campaigns Donate to DU
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-03 11:37 AM
Original message
Charlie Rangel charges Gore with polarizing the campaign
http://www.nypost.com/news/regionalnews/13081.htm

December 10, 2003 -- WASHINGTON - Rep. Charles Rangel said yesterday Howard Dean has weak support in the black community and charged that former Vice President Al Gore "polarized" the campaign by dropping into an event in Harlem to endorse the presidential candidate.

"I thought that Gore, like Clinton, would not have wanted to polarize the primary," said Rangel, who said the former vice president did not reach out to him before arranging the event in Rangel's congressional district.

<> " Rangel, who has endorsed Wesley Clark, suggested Gore was trying to use Harlem as a prop for his appearance with Dean without bothering to consult with - or spend time with - the people who live there.

Tomorrow, Rangel plans to formally endorse Clark at a Harlem rally to which he's invited black elected leaders from across the state.

(It will be instructive to compare the size of the black turnout in Harlem for Charlie Rangel's endorsement of Wes Clark tomorrow).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TXvote Donating Member (317 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-03 11:41 AM
Response to Original message
1. This From The Man who Proposed the New Draft?
Rangel is the author of the Mandatory Universal Service bill aka the new draft. This is the man who thinks ALL our children should be forced to support the US military machine and he says Gore is polarizing America?

Whatever!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jerseycoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-03 11:48 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. He thinks so
Because of the disproportionate numbers of poor and working class blacks and whites in the volunteer army, while upper middle class and wealthy kids get to go to college without having to go to war to do it. You can disagree with him on the draft, but it is not just an idle notion of his.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pistoff democrat Donating Member (733 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-03 12:16 PM
Response to Reply #5
18. Thank you.
I noted that my favorite congressperson, John Lewis, as well as John Conyers backed that as well and I was hoping it was for just that reason. We don't need any more 'fortunate sons' (or daughters now!).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TXvote Donating Member (317 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-03 12:50 PM
Response to Reply #5
32. Mistakes Can Be Made
and great leaders rectify mistakes as best they can, say by withdrawing a bill.

Mandatory Universal Service has all the potential to be rife with favoritism for priveledged children. Different from the draft of seasons past, EVERYONE between the ages of 18-25 would be required to serve for 2 years. Non gender biased of course and loosley based on the Israeli model. Ask any Israeli who serves on the front lines and who sits safely behind a desk.

Clearly BiffCo is preparing for a draft and providing NO resistance to the idea. That alone should be sending up warning flares in Rangel's mind. Universal Service would indeed level the killing fields, level in the way of dessimating the lives of an entire generation or two.

What needs to change is the access to opportunity outside of a military career for poor kids in our country. Poverty and opportunity are the issues I admire Rangel's brilliant history of service for. This proposal is a reaction to an injustice that will be used to kill our children and feed a war machine led by a mad man.

I wish Rangel would withdraw the bill. It would send a clear and righteous message to the White House that we will not throw bodies at his whim.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dusty64 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-03 08:04 AM
Response to Reply #1
58. And a VERY bad idea it is.
He may mean well, but isn't he savvy enough to see what would happen with it. Let the neocons propose this on their own and see what becomes of it, they do NOT need Democrats to continue to do their dirty work for them. Innocent cannon fodder whose blood will be exchanged for $$$$ for our regime and their donors.

On the other subject, whats the big friggin deal. President Gore has the right to endorse anyone he wants at any time he wants, just like the rest of us. I'm really sick of all the belly aching over this. It does NOT reflect well on us as a group.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tameszu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-03 09:56 PM
Response to Reply #1
59. Hardcore peaceniks should LOVE the draft idea--it would end the war
Edited on Thu Dec-11-03 09:57 PM by tameszu
immediately. Why the heck do you think the Vietnam War ended anyway?

Because when wealthy middle class whites saw that they or their kids would have the same chance of getting shot up like poor blacks and hispanics did, rich college kids started causing a ruckus in the streets and their parents started to move their votes and their money in an anti-war direction.

THIS is the whole point of Rangel's draft bill--that people wouldn't be so cavalier in supporting the war if it were THEM or THEIR OWN KIDS, as opposed to mainly poor people or minorities who had to bear the burden of the fighting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pistoff democrat Donating Member (733 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-03 11:41 AM
Response to Original message
2. Frankly, Gore's stunt
made me so angry that I hope Bill Clinton shows up with Charles Rangel tomorrow!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VermontDem2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-03 11:42 AM
Response to Original message
3. I like Rangel
But I disagree with him on this, much like trying to bring back the draft.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jerseycoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-03 11:43 AM
Response to Original message
4. Fireworks
I cannot believe anybody running for president and visiting Harlem would not pay courtesy to Charlie Rangel. Really, really dumb.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SEAburb Donating Member (985 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-03 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. Hijackers aren't known for being courteous.
Another political stunt gone bad by Dean.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
virtualobserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-03 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. Since Rangel endorsed Clark.......
Edited on Wed Dec-10-03 11:56 AM by virtualobserver
did he expect an invitation to a Dean endorsement?

How exactly was Dean supposed to "pay courtesy to Charlie Rangel"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jerseycoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-03 12:01 PM
Response to Reply #8
14. The way it's done
You call him, you say, "Hey, Charlie, I'll be in your neighborhood...," or a staff person calls a staff person. It's just a courtesy and has nothing to do with who endorses anybody.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SlavesandBulldozers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-03 11:55 AM
Response to Original message
7. Charlie's just mad
that it takes him opposing Gore to get all the press. Rangel could, of course, come out in support of another candidate - but that wouldn't buy him nearly as much exposure as opposing Gore's decision.

It's surprising that he can take so much time out of his busy schedule of forging the next Selective Service board to partake in political discourse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pistoff democrat Donating Member (733 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-03 12:17 PM
Response to Reply #7
19. Charlie endorsed Clark ages ago!
:eyes: :smoke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gloria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-03 11:56 AM
Response to Original message
9. Tony Coehlo, ultimate insider, made some comments
last night that really disturbed me.

He was on Charlie Rose and Rose asked him about Gore's action.

Coehlo said that Gore liked this sort of thing. He said that he could get back at Bush without having to run. He said by doing it this way, he could keep his business interests and drop in and out of the campaign whenever he wanted to.

The more I thought about it, the more bugged I got because it seemed to me that Gore had a personal agenda involved here, beyond just campaign tactics. Coehlo stressed the dual nature of how Gore could stay in his business pursuits and yet be involved in the campaign, almost vicariously

This comment stayed in my mind as I watched Ed Rollins on CNBC. He was asked if Gore was the leader of the party. Rollins said Gore could have been after 2000, but he dropped out of the scene for a year. That was his chance to be head of the party.

A further remark by Gloria Borger stuck in my mind...how many Dems were angry about how Gore stepped in just now, as the primary season really comes to a head.

(The last debate before NH is January 4--a matter of weeks, with a holiday season in between--why not wait until after that for this big endorsement, I ask??? I'm beginning to think people might sit on their hands come the general election if they still feel p o'd about what Gore did.....and you can be sure, the media will be reminding them.....)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
littlejoe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-03 11:57 AM
Response to Original message
10. I've watched Rangel for quite sometime,
and he appears to have a good heart, but seems inept as a congressman. I'm not sure whether he is an effective leader for the black community. He doesn't seem to be a visionary, nor does he seem to be able to articulate well as a public speaker. On the whole, he is better than Al Sharpton, but left lacking, when compared to a Jessie Jackson or Carol Mosely Braun.

And if Al Gore had given Charles Rangel a courtesy call? Since Rangel is a Clark supporter, what do you think the response would have been? You can bet that Rangel would have made his own pre-emtive strike in the media to try to diffuse the impact of the Dean/Gore event. For Rangel to get his nose tweaked now is disingenuous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jerseycoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-03 12:20 PM
Response to Reply #10
20. Here's how inept
Elected to Congress seventeen times.

bio


It begins:

"Congressman Charles B. Rangel is serving his seventeenth term as the Representative from the 15th Congressional District, comprising East and Central Harlem, the Upper West Side, and Washington Heights/Inwood. Congressman Rangel is the Ranking Member of the Committee on Ways and Means, Chairman of the Board of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee and Dean of the New York State Congressional Delegation."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helleborient Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-03 12:31 PM
Response to Reply #20
27. Unfortunately his statement on problems with black support has 0 data...
To back it up.

More political hot air.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
9119495 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-03 11:57 AM
Response to Original message
11. So Rangle can endorse, but Gore is denied that right as an American?
I see. Who else is not allowed to endorse right now?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pistoff democrat Donating Member (733 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-03 12:20 PM
Response to Reply #11
21. It was the timing
announcing in Harlem (where Charlie serves and Clinton has his office) on the day of a debate...notice how many black people were there for the endorsement? One staffer behind Dean.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deminflorida Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-03 11:57 AM
Response to Original message
12. Take if for what it's worth...but Dean is toast without at least some
of the black vote within the democratic party. And I mean for the nomination, not the general election. He has to have some of it for the South, and the Midwest, and Rust Belt States like Penn., Michigan, and Ohio. Like I've said before, this race is not about just Iowa or New Hampshire, it's about the whole country.

Aside from this mistake, that Confederate Flag remark may come back to haunt him as well. It's still on the radar, it won't go away.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Larkspur Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-03 12:06 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. Gee, Rep Jesse Jackson Jr disagrees with Rangel
so does Shirley Lee Jackson, the chairman of the CBC, the majority of the Washington DC council members, and many others. I think Dean has stronger support than what Rangel says.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mbali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-03 12:48 PM
Response to Reply #15
31. Please get your facts straight
1. Her name is Sheila Jackson Lee, not Shirley Lee Jackson
2. Rep. Jackson Lee is not nor has she ever been Chair of the CBC
3. The current chair of the CBC has not endorsed Dean or anyone else.
4. The most recent past chair of the CBC, Eddie Bernice Johnson of Texas has endorsed Edwards, as have several other CBC members.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helleborient Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-03 12:50 PM
Response to Reply #31
33. Your facts?
Elijah Cummings is the current chair of the CBC and has been widely reported to support Howard Dean...with an official endorsement forthcoming.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mbali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-03 12:57 PM
Response to Reply #33
36. Elijah Cummings has NOT endorsed anyone
a "forthcoming" endorsement is meaningless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helleborient Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-03 01:01 PM
Response to Reply #36
37. And Edwards' "several" endorsements are....????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helleborient Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-03 12:53 PM
Response to Reply #31
34. Who are the several other CBC members endorsing Edwards?
I'm curious...

Bobby Scott, Jesse Jackson, Jr. (member of CBC and officer of the Progressive Caucus), and Sheila Jackson-Lee (member of CBC and the Progressive Caucus) are in Dean's corner
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mbali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-03 01:05 PM
Response to Reply #34
39. Answer
Mel Watt, Eddie Bernice Johnson, Albert Wynn, Frank Ballance to name four.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helleborient Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-03 01:07 PM
Response to Reply #39
40. Congrats! 2 from his home state...and 2 from elsewhere...
Dean still has 3 from outside of his home state...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Very Good Dem Donating Member (99 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-03 01:13 PM
Response to Reply #40
44. Oh, please
You asked for numbers and you were given numbers. Now you want to parse the answer you don't like.

If Dean had any black people in his state and they endorsed him, Dean supporters would be crowing about how those closest to him and knew him best were behind him. But you want to dismiss the support Edwards has in HIS home state by the people who know him best because their numbers weigh against your argument.

Pathetic.

The bottom line is that Edwards has more CBC support than Dean does, at least in terms of the number of members who have endorsed him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helleborient Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-03 01:23 PM
Response to Reply #44
48. I don't deny that - congrats John Edwards - 4 is technically "several"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helleborient Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-03 01:09 PM
Response to Reply #39
42. Those are the only ones Goobergunch picks up - Dean leads outside of
NC over Edwards in endorsements from members of the Congressional Black Caucus 3-2 - Congrats for Dean!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Very Good Dem Donating Member (99 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-03 01:15 PM
Response to Reply #42
45. This is ridiculous
Your effort to diminish other candidates with such silly semantics - now that the numbers weigh against your argument, you now insist that CERTAIN CBC members don't count - does nothing to help your claim.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helleborient Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-03 01:24 PM
Response to Reply #45
49. The attempt was to diminish Howard Dean's African-American support...
That is what I was arguing against.

The quote "several" have endorsed John Edwards was intended to diminish Howard Dean's support. Technically, usually, several means at least 3...so several have endorsed Dean and several have endorsed Edwards.

I'm happy with that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Very Good Dem Donating Member (99 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-03 02:12 PM
Response to Reply #49
50. How does
noting that several CBC members have endorsed Edwards in any way "diminish" Howard Dean?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-03 07:08 PM
Response to Reply #31
54. But Sheila Jackson Lee has endorsed
Dean! :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tsipple Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-03 11:59 AM
Response to Original message
13. Re: Dean's Support in the Black Community
Rep. Charles Rangel said yesterday Howard Dean has weak support in the black community...

Uh, no. Polling shows that Dean is the best supported Democrat among African-Americans, with the possible exception of Rev. Al Sharpton.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pistoff democrat Donating Member (733 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-03 12:24 PM
Response to Reply #13
24. Polling Data Here
This has translated into potential problems for Dean in the polls. A survey released two weeks ago by Gallup, for example, showed Dean's support at slightly less than half of Wesley Clark's support among African Americans nationwide.

Clark -- 15%
Dean -- 7%


http://www.thecarpetbaggerreport.com/archives/000804.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helleborient Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-03 12:30 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. In fairness...this article is from Oct. 29th...
And the poll cited is likely older than that...before the endorsements from leading African-American national leaders.

The article cites those endorsements as good news.

How do we expect the media to be fair...when we're not fair in reporting information?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pistoff democrat Donating Member (733 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-03 12:32 PM
Response to Reply #25
28. excellent point
what am I citing poll #'s for when they're rigged or people don't answer truthfully...plus, it seems each polling company has different #'s?

Let's just work for our candidate and back whomever gets the nomination?

:grouphug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helleborient Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-03 12:33 PM
Response to Reply #28
30. That's what I do (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deminflorida Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-03 12:08 PM
Response to Original message
16. I have a lot deep feeling that Dean people are going to be crying...
when the polls come out about the 3rd week of January.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Larkspur Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-03 12:12 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. It will be tears of joy as we blow out the field
Clark withdrew from Iowa, so he's got no hope of winning that state's Caucus.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pistoff democrat Donating Member (733 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-03 12:22 PM
Response to Reply #16
22. EVERYONE
at DU will be crying about January 20 if Dean was the democratic nominee!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-03 07:11 PM
Response to Reply #22
55. You're Wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
adadem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-12-03 04:40 AM
Response to Reply #22
61. And all who want bush out
will be crying come November.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helleborient Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-03 12:23 PM
Response to Original message
23. Weakness in the black community?
Endorsements from half of the DC city council, chair of the Congressional Black Caucus, Sheila Jackson-Lee, Jesse Jackson, Jr.

And there are 2 black candidates still in the race!?

So...how did the white candidates do with black support when Jesse Jackson was running??

Rangel seems to have a lot of wishful thinking...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pistoff democrat Donating Member (733 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-03 12:30 PM
Response to Reply #23
26. Please see #24
it's still too early really; but, as with unions, populations don't necessarily just blindly follow their leaders
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helleborient Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-03 12:32 PM
Response to Reply #26
29. The info. in #24 is OLD! And cites the positive endorsements...
From Dean from the African-American community.

The article is Oct. 29th...almost a month and a half ago...and the poll cited is likely older.

The effect of leaders in the African-American community endorsing Dean would not be reflected here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mbali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-03 12:56 PM
Response to Reply #23
35. Correction
The Chair of the CBC has NOT endorsed Dean.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helleborient Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-03 01:02 PM
Response to Reply #35
38. Corrected...3 other members of the CBC have endorsed Dean...
Even with 2 African-American candidates still in the race.

Which other white Democratic candidates have more endorsements from the CBC than Dean?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mbali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-03 01:08 PM
Response to Reply #38
41. Edwards
has the endorsement of four CBC members, compared with Dean's three.

I don't think that these numbers matter much - it's silly to get into a "my candidate has x number more black people in his corner than yours does" debate. But the numbers seem to matter to you, so you should know that Dean has fewer CBC member endorsement than Edwards does.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helleborient Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-03 01:12 PM
Response to Reply #41
43. I know Dean leads 3-2 outside of North Carolina...
And yes that does matter in the face of reports that Dean from a strong white majority state in New England will have tremendous problems pulling in African-American support.

The reality is...Dean is doing basically as well as any other white candidate in pulling in support from leaders of the African-American community.

Edwards only leads 4-2 because he has the support of his home state representatives, but there are no African-American representatives from Vermont.

If you look at outside of North Carolina as being neutral ground, Dean has stronger support.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Very Good Dem Donating Member (99 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-03 01:17 PM
Response to Reply #43
46. Whatever
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helleborient Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-03 01:21 PM
Response to Reply #46
47. Good, intelligent response... (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-03 07:12 PM
Response to Reply #23
56. OR just lyin' off the top of his head.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polpilot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-03 02:27 PM
Response to Original message
51. Instructive? 'size of the black turnout' is the sort of divisive comment
that Dean is working to eliminate. For Rangel to suggest that Gore didn't have the freedom to support his candidate is absurd. Gore doesn't need Rangel's permission to endorse anyone. It'll be interesting to see if Rangel seeks polpilot's permission to endorse Clark. I'm feeling a little 'polarized' by Rangel's endorsement.

Dean '04...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babzilla Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-03 03:32 PM
Response to Original message
52. Will Rangel's endorsement be "polarizing the primary"?
Sounds like Rangel's got personal issues with Gore.

"I thought that Gore, like Clinton, would not have wanted to polarize the primary," said Rangel, who said the former vice president did not reach out to him before arranging the event in Rangel's congressional district."

For one thing it was not Gore who organized this event. Is Rangel the representative of Harlem or the king of Harlem? I was not aware that it is necessary to reach out to Rangel before scheduling a speech within his district.

"Rep. Charles Rangel said yesterday Howard Dean has weak support in the black community and charged that former Vice President Al Gore "polarized" the campaign by dropping into an event in Harlem to endorse the presidential candidate.

snip

Tomorrow, Rangel plans to formally endorse Clark at a Harlem rally to which he's invited black elected leaders from across the state.'


So if Gore endorses a candidate it is polarizing, if Rangel endorses a candidate it is reaching out to the black community, got it.

Wow,what a flattering photo the NYPost chose to accompany the article.


BUSH WHACKER: Former Vice President Al Gore lets loose a vitriolic attack against President Bush yesterday in Harlem.
- N.Y. Post: G.N. Miller
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polpilot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-03 06:45 PM
Response to Reply #52
53. Rangel, King of Harlem, polarizes with Clark endorsement. Shame on
you Charlie endorsing before the primaries. You bad, bad boy.

Dean '04...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-10-03 07:15 PM
Response to Reply #53
57. I've heard it said of Rangel
Edited on Wed Dec-10-03 07:16 PM by zidzi
that during the Govenor's race in 2002 that if Carl McGovern didn't get to be the democratic nominee that he would Not be voting for Andrew Cuomo... that his support would go to pataki...how vindictive and "King" Shit like is that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tameszu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-11-03 10:00 PM
Response to Reply #52
60. It amazes me
that people cannot tell the difference between individual Congresscritters and former Presidents and VPs. Geez.

Or do not at all understand why the tradition of non-endorsement existed previously? Before you continue with this utterly intellectually dishonest line of argumentation, I would suggest that you imagine the kind of whining you and other Deanies would do if Koppel's intuitions/rumors are correct and Hillary and/or Bill endorse Clark.

As a Clarkie, a Hillary or Bill endorsement would at best be a mixed blessing, due to the amount of massive Deanie abuse we would be almost certain to face.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dusty64 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-12-03 08:14 AM
Response to Original message
62. And I suppose the
attack by Rangel isn't "polarizing". Let me get this straight. He wants to endorse Clark, but President Gore isn't allowed to make an endorsement of his own. This is the type of hypocritical double standard I expect of the rightwing. I'm really starting to wonder about Rangel, first the call to do the BFEE's dirty work for them via the draft and now this. Hmmmmmmmm.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Nov 03rd 2024, 07:49 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Politics/Campaigns Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC