Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Putin, Bush, Eason Jordan, Dan Rather

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Media Donate to DU
 
Cocoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-05 01:19 PM
Original message
Putin, Bush, Eason Jordan, Dan Rather
my email to Dan Froomkin:

Dear Dan,

I'm skeptical about those accounts about the private exchange between Putin and Bush about some fired journalist.

Obviously Bush's reference to that discussion was remarkable, and this discussion thread from Democratic Underground shows that there was interest at the time.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=104&topic_id=3171298#3176552

But it also shows that no one in the U.S. media looked into what actually was said.

I used "Google News" to try to find if anyone tried to find out, and all I could find was a Russian news outlet, which implied that the question was about Eason Jordan at CNN, not about Dan Rather.

http://en.rian.ru/rian/index.cfm?prd_id=160&msg_id=5441851&startrow=1&date=2005-02-24&do_alert=0

That is credible to me for a number of reasons. Presumably the Russian reporter who asked Bush the question was Putin's own Jeff Gannon, a plant who uses a question to help his boss make his point. Likely this Russian news site is part of the same game.

Therefore the question and the story afterwards were likely public extensions of Putin's private remark to Bush.

Also, the Eason story really is a better example of repression of the U.S. press. Jordan made a serious challenge to U.S. policy (there are credible questions about deaths of journalists at the hands of U.S. troops -- Reuters for example demanded an investigation).

The Rather story got a lot more play in the U.S., but I think overseas the Jordan story would be much more significant.

Another thing is the timing. Like I said, there was zero reporting done on this "odd exchange," as you called it, when it happened.

The very first comment on it that I could find (and I was looking) was George Stephanopoulos yesterday, who said it was about Dan Rather.

To me, it looks like the U.S. media took a few days to get its story straight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
aden_nak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-28-05 01:29 PM
Response to Original message
1. I believe Putin mentioned "those reporters on CBS".
But don't quote me just because I quoted them. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 08:49 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Media Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC