The Internet Effect on News: Provocative, new, unexpected get profitable "hits"

[DeepModem Mom]

TIME: March 24, 2008
The Internet Effect on News
Posted by Michael Scherer

Here is a basic shift that has occurred in the news business: Because of the Internet, you, the reader, no longer have to buy information in pre-fabricated packages like “newspapers.” You can just go online and individually select the articles you want to read. And there are lots of websites and blogs to help you out. Every day, Matt Drudge, the Huffington Post, Yahoo, Google, Swampland, or a hundred other different bloggers, will pre-select articles for you and provide links. You choose your own adventure.

There is a corollary effect here: As the value of the package declines, the value of the individual article increases. Online, news organizations charge advertisers based on the number of hits they can get on a site. And since the hits are often coming for specific stories, and not the entire site, a blockbuster story that gets linked to, say, Drudge, is money in the bank.

This means that the competition on the level of the individual story is more intense than ever before, and there is enormous pressure to distinguish yourself from the pack. Assume, for instance, that 12 news organizations do the same story on the same day about how Hillary Clinton has a tough road ahead of her to get the nomination. Which story is going to get the most links and therefore the most readers? Is it the one that cautiously weighs the pros and cons, and presents a nuanced view of her chances? Or is it the one that says she is toast, and anyone who thinks different is living on another planet?...

If you say something provocatively, in a new way, or with an unexpected spin, you will succeed online. If you play it safe, you will not....

This trend towards story-by-story competition, and away from package-by-package competition, is a blessing and a curse. It is forcing better writing, quicker responsiveness, and it is increasing the value of actual news-making and clear-eyed thinking. But it is also increasing pressure on reporters to push the boundaries of provocation....

http://www.time-blog.com/swampland/2008/03/the_internet_effect_on_news.html

[Mountainman]

1. If I relied on only printed and tv media in 2003 I would not have known about the lies that led to

the Iraq war when I did back then. The internet has more objective information because you can get from foreign sources news that they will not print here. The Guardian comes to mind.