Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The New Yorker's Hendrik Hertzberg on Chris Matthews: A broader picture than the NYT Mag's

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Media Donate to DU
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-28-08 01:27 PM
Original message
The New Yorker's Hendrik Hertzberg on Chris Matthews: A broader picture than the NYT Mag's
TV Newser: Wednesday May 28, 2008
A Softer Ball: Hertzberg on Matthews


Hertzberg and Matthews worked together in the Carter Administration (The New Yorker)

Last month's New York Times Magazine profile of Chris Matthews (or as Matthews apparently refers to it, "that f**king article") left some with a bad taste in their mouths. The New Yorker's Hendrik Hertzberg, who says in a full disclosure, "I have more reasons than most to love Chris Matthews," paints a broader picture. Hertzberg and Matthews worked together in the Carter administration.

"When I first met him, thirty or so years ago, his hair was a different color, he was skinnier, and his neckties were more random, but he was otherwise pretty much the same political jabber machine he is today," he writes.

Hertzberg addresses the profile at the end of his piece. "The profile that ran in the New York Times Magazine a few weeks ago captured some of Chris (the insecurity, the self-promotion), but some is not all," he writes. "The insecurity without the huge appetite for life, the self-promotion without the empathic social conscience that lurks somewhere behind all that love of the political game — these give a distorted impression."

...Hertzberg's opinion on why Matthews "went kind of haywire," during the presidency of Bill Clinton:

"In my opinion, Chris went kind of haywire during the Clinton years. I have my own theories about why. Theory one: he and Clinton are too much alike. Same age, same size, same crazed gregariousness, same gift of gab, same manic energy, same thirst for attention, roughly similar political views and non-elite backgrounds. (A similar this-town-ain't-big-enough-for-both-of-us dynamic, this one focusing on rival good-ol'-boy personae, poisoned the relationship between Howell Raines, then the editorial page of the Times, and Clinton. In my opinion.) Civil wars are always the bitterest.

Theory two: it had something to do with the difference between Irish Catholic and Southern Baptist views of sin and forgiveness."

http://www.mediabistro.com/tvnewser/msnbc/a_softer_ball_hertzberg_on_matthews_85732.asp#more
Refresh | 0 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Media Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC