History Channel Lies about Kennedy Assassination Yet Again.

[CTKA-Probe]

"INSIDE THE TARGET CAR"

Jim Di Eugenio and his team have yet again exposed assassination farce that was played out yet again on your screens recently.

'Inside the Target Car' involves the 6th Floor Museum Curator and research sell out
(Lawrence Dunkle) aka Gary Mack a lying and a flip flopping even more than he has done previously.

If you wanna see some ass get himself burned, well I hope you dine out on these tasty morsels we have assembled for you here.

http://www.ctka.net/2009/target_car_cranor.html

Theres heaps of Links within the article demolishing the show.

"JFK: THE RUBY CONNECTION"

This is part one of a two parter in which Jim Di again teaches Gary Mack respect. Lets face it utterly Dunkle's outclassed and Jim has barely warmed for the killer blow in part two. Which I assure you I shall post as promptly as I can.

http://www.ctka.net/2009/ruby_mack.html

Have a great read and any comments are welcome.

[Sebastian Doyle]

1. History channel is controlled by the right wing Hearst corporation

And lets just say that everything Rupert Murdoch knows about right wing biased tabloid "journalism", he learned from William Randolph Hearst and his descendants. All of their shows involving JFK, RFK, or 9/11 need to be taken with a huge grain of rock salt. They are absolutely laughable, as was the Hearst published "Popular Mechanics" 9/11 fictional issue, assembled by one Benjamin Chertoff, cousin of Bush Crime Family goon Michael "of the Devil" Chertoff.

[stopbush]

2. Facts - like those presented in "Inside The Target Car" - are inconvenient things for birthers, er,

CTists like you.

Political scientist Robert S. Robins and psychiatrist Jerrold M. Post discussed your type of paranoia in "Political Paranoia as Cinematic Motif: Stone's 'JFK,'" which was presented at the 1997 Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association. Robins and Post observed:

"The paranoid message will give more and more, and then it will give even more. The entertainment resources of the paranoid message are unrivaled. It offers puzzles, drama, passion, heroes, villains, and struggle. If the story-line can be tied to an historical event, especially one that involves romantic characters and unexpected death, then fiction, history, and popular delusion can be joined in the pursuit of profit. The story, moreover, need never end. If evidence appears that refutes the conspiracy, the suppliers of the discrediting material will themselves be accused of being part of the conspiracy. The paranoid explanatory system is a closed one. Only confirmatory evidence is accepted. Contradictions are dismissed as being naive or, more likely, part of the conspiracy itself."

These guys described you and your fellow paranoids to a tee, and way back in 1997. How's that make ya feel?

[CTKA-Probe]

4. Yawning Has Broken.

YAAAAAAWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN

Thats precisely how it made me feel.

I take it your either CDDraftsman or Obelisk from You Tube aren't you. Oh please tell us about James Randi and Arthur C Clarke.

If not your either ignorant, arrogant (or both) no matter whose (if any) side you work on.

Now, if you are genuine you will be pleased to know that at the moment we are currently working
on a fairly hard hitting critique on a certain individual that confronts many of the skewed aspects of 'Birther' conspiracy theories.
Now if you want to attack 'Birthers' please go and expend your obvious energies on a David Icke, Rush Limbaugh or Alex Jones blog.

Vince Bugliosi (your avatar) was incidentally a big fan of Probe. Furthermore Bugliosi was challenged to a debate by Jim Di Eugenio, so to was Mack and others and they never ever showed except John McAdams and the transcripts and debates are available at Black Op Radio.

http://www.blackopradio.com/archives2009.html

Check out Shows 442-443.

[Aragorn]

3. actual psychiatrists

are barred, ethically, from making a diagnosis in this setting. Could it be made by a narcissist who is always right? Possibly. Although the last sentence seems more sadistic to me.

[CTKA-Probe]

5. Hmmmmmm

Is the term Narcisshole appropriate for our perfect friend?