Truncated title to fit subject lengthhttp://www.stanford.edu/group/gradethenews/pages2/marriage.htmGrade the News Editor's note: The following is a memo from Phil Bronstein, executive editor at the San Francisco Chronicle to the staff
Posted March 15. 2004
From: Bronstein, Phil
Sent: Friday, March 12, 2004 4:20 PM
To: NewsroomDL
Subject: note
In the last few days, we have had numerous lengthy meetings and discussions about a conflict of interest issue surrounding the same sex marriage story. Specifically, the question was whether Rachel Gordon and Liz Mangelsdorf, having been married a few days ago, should continue to cover the same-sex marriage story in light of questions readers could - and do - ask about the newspaper’s objectivity and integrity.
... The process was difficult - painful at times - as we maneuvered through new territory: same-sex marriage as a major news story and potential conflicts it could cause. Strong feelings were expressed, though in the most professional and appropriate way. The nearly four hours of conversations with Rachel and Liz themselves have been intense but extremely respectful all around. Everyone involved, however strong their opinions, expressed concerns for the newspaper and its integrity.
All of the discussion and debate, including informal talk around the office, would make a valuable seminar at any journalism institute because it has been so wide-ranging and because it involves both well-charted and new ground.
The majority of editors involved in the story, and in the discussions, were in agreement on one aspect: that Chronicle journalists directly and personally involved in a major news story - one in whose outcome they also have a personal stake - should not also cover that story.
moreSo, I guess this means that black people can't cover civil-rights stories. Latinos can't cover immigration issues. As an openly gay journalist, I dread the day that I will be unable to pursue my craft in the United States.