|
1) To rationalize our being there in the first place & shore up support for such, in the face of evidence to the contrary;
2) To provide a more "noble" & palatible alternative to comparing it to Vietnam, (the much more obvious parallel to our invasion of Iraq).
I think this additional piece of propaganda is already backfiring in other parts of the world where the press is more likely to challenge Bush/Rove and their tortured logic.
The situation today is also far different from WWII because back then, all citizens were called upon to sacrifice. Not happening today, except those in combat and the lower & middle class are sacrifice our futures by default, because any "programs of social uplift" (MLK,Jr.) are cut back to finance this invasion AND to finance tax cuts for the wealthy that COULD be used to finance the invasion. It's ALL tied up together, and almost everyone loses.
So in the long run, EVERYONE is paying except the upper class, which includes Bushco & cronies. The only way they could end up "paying" is by being voted out of office. If we don't do that, we have surrendered almost all power to them.
As much as any of us hate to hear it, the caller who admitted the parallels to WWII because we're the agressor now as the Nazis were the agressors then... anyone who's honest will have to admit that. In that way it's backfiring, too, against all of us.
|