It's not this poor sad ignorant freeper's fault he's so ignorant, it's Jennings, Brokaw and Rather's fault for not showing this tape every time they talk about Sept. 11. Why on earth would they not show what Bush was doing at this ridiculously historic moment? It's on fucking tape!
Does Michael Moore have to do EVERYTHING for them?
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=104&topic_id=1791845#1795105
<http://www.suntimes.com/output/answ-man/sho-sunday-ebert13.html>
Q. In your article about "Fahrenheit 9/11" at Cannes, you quote Michael Moore's film that, when informed of the second attack on the World Trade Center, President Bush "incredibly remained with the students for another seven minutes, reading from the book, until a staff member suggested that he leave. The look on his face as he reads the book, knowing what he knows, is disquieting." Apparently you believe this version of events. Does Moore identify a source? Or is his word good enough for you? If that is the case given that "Bowling for Columbine" was riddled with half-truths and lies that even he corrected on the DVD, why would you assume this movie to be fact?
A. Bra Grier of Omaha writes: "Here's the video of Bush in the classroom for five minutes after being told 'America is under attack.' Unfortunately, the video ends before the president does."
To see it for yourself, go to <http://www.thememoryhole.com/911/bush-911.htm>www.thememoryhole.com/911/bush-911.htm <http://www.thememoryhole.com/911/bush-911.htm>