Stephanie Merritt
Sunday February 18, 2007
The Observer
... Surnow, whose credits include 24 and who recently appeared on Fox News defending the necessity of torture in certain circumstances, reduces this imbalance to the basics: turn on any so-called satire show and you'll get 10 Bush and Cheney jokes but nary a snigger at Hillary or global warming.
Leaving aside the obvious answers that a) Surnow doesn't watch The Daily Show, which has a fine tradition of ridiculing Democrats and b) Bush and Cheney have lent themselves to comedy over the past few years, he appears to have failed to grasp the point of satire. Comedy at its best is inherently subversive, from the Lord of Misrule to Saturday Night Live; it holds up to mockery the follies of those in power; it exposes hypocrisy in a way that entertains us, but it does so with a purpose that goes beyond entertainment. Making someone a figure of ridicule ought to make it harder for them to continue publicly in their hypocrisy, and a well-aimed swipe from a cartoonist or comic can damage a politician's image far more effectively than a 1,000-word dressing-down.
This is why conservatives and satire just don't go; you can't be subversive and want to preserve the status quo. Even jokes aimed against themselves don't work; one particularly gruesome trailer for the show features right-wing commentators Rush Limbaugh and Anne Coulter as President and Vice-President. 'Stay tuned for The Half Hour News Hour' winks Limbaugh unctuously, and Coulter adds: 'If you don't, we'll invade your countries, kill your leaders and convert you to Christianity.'
It's a joke - geddit? - but it isn't satire. In fact, it comes off as a smug conviction of your own rightness so bulletproof that you can joke about it with a swagger. No matter which side of the House you're sending up, satire begins with an unwillingness to accept lies and bombast from those in power - and that is not in Fox's remit.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/story/0,,2015659,00.html