Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Before .. "General Betray Us," .. was Limbaugh's "Senator Betrayus"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Bush/Conservatives Donate to DU
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-22-07 08:50 PM
Original message
Before .. "General Betray Us," .. was Limbaugh's "Senator Betrayus"
Before MoveOn's "General Betray Us," there was Limbaugh's "Senator Betrayus"

Summary: Rush Limbaugh has called the MoveOn.org "General Petraeus or General Betray Us?" advertisement "contemptible" and "indecent," but months earlier, on his radio show, he told his audience that he had a new name for Senator Chuck Hagel: "Senator Betrayus." Though Limbaugh has taken exception to accusations that he has attacked the patriotism of his political opponents, the "Senator Betrayus" remark is one of several instances in which Limbaugh has done so.

On September 10, MoveOn.org's much-discussed advertisement headlined "General Petraeus or General Betray Us?" critical of Gen. David Petraeus, appeared in The New York Times. On the September 11 broadcast of his nationally syndicated radio show, Rush Limbaugh called the advertisement "contemptible" and "indecent." However, months earlier, on his radio show, he told his audience that he had a new name for Sen. Chuck Hagel (R-NE): "Senator Betrayus." On the January 25 broadcast (subscription required) of his radio show, Limbaugh broke from his commentary on an interview of Vice President Dick Cheney on the January 24 edition of CNN's The Situation Room to say: "By the way, we had a caller call, couldn't stay on the air, got a new name for Senator Hagel in Nebraska, we got General Petraeus and we got Senator Betrayus, new name for Senator Hagel." A day earlier, Hagel had sided with Democrats on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee in voting to approve a nonbinding resolution declaring that Bush's escalation in Iraq was against "the national interest." ...

http://mediamatters.org/items/200709220003?f=h_latest
Refresh | +7 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
Goblinmonger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-22-07 08:56 PM
Response to Original message
1. Rush is a hypocritical prick?
I am shocked. SHOCKED I tell you. His call screeners are WAY underpaid if they can keep away the people who want to call bullshit on that one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
liberal renegade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-22-07 08:58 PM
Response to Original message
2. he's a puke!
Edited on Sat Sep-22-07 08:59 PM by tenaciousradical
Limbaugh has a name for everybody he doesn't like.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
creeksneakers2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-22-07 09:20 PM
Response to Original message
3. I remember Limbaugh saying that
the group of generals who called for Rumsfeld's ouster were part of a Bill Clinton plot. His brother, David Limbaugh wrote for a conservative website that General Zinni "put a smile on Osama's face."
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
The Count Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-22-07 09:47 PM
Response to Original message
4. But Hagel doesn't wear an uniform, so it's fine! Cronyn 'splained to us: only
Edited on Sat Sep-22-07 09:47 PM by The Count
while wearing uniform they are Gods. When undressed - fair game - "politics"
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-22-07 11:05 PM
Response to Original message
5. I remember when Limbaugh was saying this on his show last winter--
did any Repugs stand up for Hagel, one of their own colleagues and a decorated combat vet--a guy who defended Max Cleland and John McCain from attacks on their character? Fuck no--crickets. But they'll go all out to defend Petraeus.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
luckyleftyme2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-24-07 04:53 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. what choice did petraus have
Edited on Mon Sep-24-07 04:54 AM by luckyleftyme2
WITH HIS BOSS'S SURPRISE VISIT TO IRAQ SEVERAL DAYS BEFORE HE WAS TO APPEAR IN WASHINGTON
WHAT ELSE COULD HE SAY?"I RETIRE"
JAN21 2009 CAN'T GET HERE SOON ENOUGH!
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
specwar Donating Member (4 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 09:38 PM
Response to Original message
7. Wow, I thought people came in here for information
It is sad that a forum for chatting about ideas has turned into a misinformation fest. Senator hagel has betrayed us. He is the leader he gets to make the decisions. The Generals job is the implimentation of those policy decisions. I have been in the military for 16 years. We impliment policy without exception, without question. Hagel could stop funding the war with his democratic buddies. But they don't want the blow back they will get from people like me (cowards). My contention is this. If your ideas are so good then why don't you run with them and live or die by the consequences. Of course the answer is that they want it both ways (cowards). It is like I always say "If you don't stand for something, then you most surely stand for nothing"
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Dec 22nd 2024, 09:45 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Bush/Conservatives Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC