Ignoring evidence to the contrary, Wash. Times uncritically quoted claim that Obama's birth

[struggle4progress]

birth certificate has "clearly been altered"

Summary: The Washington Times uncritically reported a claim by Pennsylvania attorney Philip J. Berg, as stated in an ad Berg placed in the newspaper, that the birth certificate released by Barack Obama's campaign has "clearly been altered." The Times did not note that FactCheck.org reported that it has "seen, touched, examined and photographed the original birth certificate," concluding that it "meets all of the requirements from the State Department for proving U.S. citizenship," nor did it note a statement by Health Department director Chiyome Fukino that "the Hawai'i State Department of Health has Sen. Obama's original birth certificate on record in accordance with state policies and procedures" ... http://mediamatters.org/items/200812050010?f=h_latest


The Washington Times, of course, is not really a newspaper but rather a Moonie propaganda outlet

[alstephenson]

1. Pathetic excuse for newspaper. eom

[Puzzler]

2. "Is the Wash. Times aimed at Fox viewers who have learned to read?"

A great quote from a reader comment on the article.