Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

One Job You Can't Have If You're A Poor Black Single Mother

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Bush/Conservatives Donate to DU
 
NewHampshireDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 05:30 AM
Original message
One Job You Can't Have If You're A Poor Black Single Mother
Here's a little excerpt from Rich Lowry's opinion piece published in The New Hampshire Union (mis)Leader:

"But no one should underestimate the importance of the signals sent by our culture. Stay-at-home moms have been bombarded for years with messages disparaging their choice. Now they should hear something else: that staying at home is a great and admirable act of self-sacrifice; that a career is not the only venue for important and meaningful work; that it is not unambitious to want to give your young children the full measure of your energy and attention."

Again, unless you happen to be a single mother, in which case your desire to stay home is a sign that you are lazy, and therefore must be forced to find important and meaningful work at the local Wal-Mart, or McDonald's, or whatever other low-paying job is out there, while some unlicensed, unregulated childcare provider gives your child much less than the full measure of the energy and attention they deserve.

How do you spell "hypocrite"? I don't know, but I know it starts with an "R."

You can read the whole piece here: http://www.theunionleader.com/articles_showa.html?article=34946
Refresh | 0 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
rfranklin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-04 06:51 AM
Response to Original message
1. It seems he is being sympathetic to the plight of single mothers...
Edited on Wed Mar-24-04 06:54 AM by rfranklin
edited because I confused your comment with his column. You're right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
fortyfeetunder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-28-04 12:50 PM
Response to Original message
2. No surprise
Author is from the conservative "National Review"
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Sugarbleus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-04 06:52 AM
Response to Original message
3. OMG! I just wrote to a rw conservative xtian site
Edited on Mon Mar-29-04 06:54 AM by Sugarbleus
run by Beverly Lahaye....concerned christian women???? forgot the exact titel.

They had the exact hypocritcal stats on their sites. It was soooooooo glaring I just HAD to write to them.

First they had the nerve to make a serious case for single mothers(welfare mothers) get a job! They produced stats on how the welfare roles had gone down (though not sighting how these people were actually faring by being kick off welfare) These people were obviously making a prejudicial case for saving tax money--While belittling the struggling mother with a housefull of kids to support on ONE SALARY.

The next chart was about the "importance" of married stay at home mothers. Saying since these "wedded" mothers could, feasably if needed, go back to work because they had a two parent household which presumably could afford child care. Most importantly, they went on to encourage that women NOT go back to work when they have young children at home. Saying these women should sacrifice more earnings for the greater benefit of raising their young children. They were putting a LOT of importance on parents remaining WITH THEIR children rather than going into the workforce. BUT, the single welfare mothers were considered a drain on society and SHOULD be away from their children in order to GET A JOB; no childcare help was entered into this data either. GEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEZUS What Hypocracy. I let these folks know how twisted and contradictory their theories were.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
MountainLaurel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-04 08:46 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Concerned Women for America
:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Sugarbleus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-04 10:17 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Yessireee bob, thats the very one................
I listened to the senate today on c-span. They were on the welfare reform thingy AGAIN....... they were discussing other things too, but I got all choked up when I heard them rale about this program once more. I immediately wrote to my state sen. and to T. Daschle with my very pointed concerns over the bias between single mothers and "wedded" mothers. We shall see if ANYONE responds to my concerns.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Dec 22nd 2024, 04:35 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Bush/Conservatives Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC