Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Linda Chavez: Iraqi torture was the WOMEN's fault

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Bush/Conservatives Donate to DU
 
brooklynite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-06-04 02:24 PM
Original message
Linda Chavez: Iraqi torture was the WOMEN's fault
Edited on Sat May-08-04 09:03 AM by Skinner
From today's NEW YORK POST:

They make you want to turn away, those awful pictures of naked men piled into human pyramids while smirking American soldiers give the thumbs-up sign or grin inanely into the camera. Then you look closer, not at the humiliating jumble of naked flesh but at the American soldiers, and you realize that some of them are women. What is already a shocking tale becomes even more obscene and unsettling.

Clearly there has been a terrible breakdown in order and discipline at Abu Ghraib prison and elsewhere in Iraq, and perhaps Afghanistan and Guantanamo, Cuba. The officer in charge of the facility at the time the apparent abuses took place was Reserve Brigadier General Janis Karpinski, who has now gone on national television to defend herself. Speaking on ABC's "Good Morning America," Gen. Karpinski says that she "did not know anything about it. And had I known anything about it I certainly would have reacted very quickly."

But that's the point. She didn't know what was going on, and she should have.

It is hard to know what led to this breakdown in discipline. But one factor that may have contributed — but which I doubt investigators will want to even consider — is whether the presence of women in the unit actually encouraged more misbehavior, especially of the sexual nature that the pictures reveal.

EDITED BY ADMIN: COPYRIGHT
Refresh | 0 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-06-04 02:27 PM
Response to Original message
1. They'll try to use this t o get women out of the service
these right wingers want women back in the kitchen barefoot and pregnant
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
yardwork Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-06-04 02:28 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. That will conflict with their plans to draft women.
It's a dilemma for the right-wingers.

Linda Chavez is a hateful person.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-06-04 02:34 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Well of cousre
I had that argument with many wingers yesterday

They are still in denial but stepford wives will suddenly have
the greatest wakeup

Not only did they get their war

but it is time to pay up with their flesh and blood

And I realize a draft is coming because of what bush has done to our military
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
demnan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-06-04 02:34 PM
Response to Original message
3. Sure the women are getting pregnant over there
Because birth control is not made available to them! Also think about it. If someone sent you over there, wouldn't you try to find the least invasive way to get yourself sent back home?

I'd get pregnant in a minute just to get my ass out of there!
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-06-04 02:35 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. No, if you did htat, and they proved it
you could face an article 32 or even general court martial

Look also women are given mamy options regarding this issue.... sorry
but I have seen that in person.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Classical_Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-06-04 02:34 PM
Response to Original message
5. She's a moron.
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
dedhed Donating Member (353 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-06-04 02:34 PM
Response to Original message
6. What a great way to get chicks!
It is hard to know what led to this breakdown in discipline. But one factor that may have contributed — but which I doubt investigators will want to even consider — is whether the presence of women in the unit actually encouraged more misbehavior, especially of the sexual nature that the pictures reveal.

Typical jar-head train of thought, according to Chavez:

"Hmmmm... boy, that soldier's hot... how do I get her to notice me? Flowers? Maybe I can gift-wrap a carton of Lucky Strikes. Wait a minute... strip the prisoners naked and make them bang each other... BINGO! Hell, I'll even take a picture of her pointing at their willies! She'll fall for me big-time!!"

Thank you, Linda... you incredible twit!

:bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
russian33 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-06-04 02:39 PM
Response to Original message
8. It's not the women!
It's Clinton and gays...c'mon Linda, that's today's memo, did you miss it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
fortyfeetunder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-17-04 12:34 AM
Response to Reply #8
13. Nah, it's waiving the magic Clenis
that makes women do the most amazing things....
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
aintitfunny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-06-04 02:58 PM
Response to Original message
9. The only factors giving occassion to such abuse
are those that allowed it or encouraged or even ordered it to happen in the first place. This drivel is ridiculous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
amber dog democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-07-04 09:52 AM
Response to Original message
10. Right and Maybe Clinton had a hand ,(or something ele), it too.
Anyone can be a perputrator.
Look up the women who were SS Death Camp guards. Mostly men were involved but women did demonstrate sadistic behaviors.


I am just not buying this assumption -

" including the breakdown in discipline and unit cohesion that have gone hand in hand with gender integration in the military. "

Looks to me that the woman in the photographs was just part of the team.
I wonder what was not captured in the media.

Chavez seems more resistant to overall changes in American society, that are reflected in the military. I bet in 1948 she would not have like Trueman's order to end racial segregation in the US Armed Forces.


Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
LeftCoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-07-04 06:05 PM
Response to Original message
11. brooklynite
Per DU copyright rules
please post only four
paragraphs from the
news source.

Thank you.

LeftCoast
DU Moderator
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
squidbro Donating Member (129 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-07-04 09:31 PM
Response to Original message
12. Sexual tension a cause of criminal behavior?
Ms. Chavez needs to get a clue. The abuses were not due to sexual tension. They were sanctioned and encouraged in order to get the Iraqis to divulge "secrets".

If proper military discipline and procedures were followed, the abuses would not have happened, sexual issues not withstanding.

As a former service member who did spend time overseas, I was witness to some of the "fraternization" that Ms. Chavez speaks of. Yet, none of the people I served with used that as an excuse to terrorize foreign citizens or should I say "prisoners of war".

By the way, sexual fraternization goes on all of the time in the civilian world. In schools and offices. Horror of horrors, it also results in unwanted pregnancies!! It must be the cause of gang wars, and all sorts of criminal behavior in our society.

Perhaps we should go back to the 19th century and keep women in subjection.

Ms. Chavez is entitled to her own opinion. But the fact that she can vote and write a column in the New York Post is a testament to the freedoms she has. Does she really want to give them up?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
yellowcanine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-04 01:24 PM
Response to Original message
14. No one has ever mistaken Linda for being the brightest bulb in the house.
She was clearly the beneficiary of affirmative action tokinism in the Reagan White House.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Dec 22nd 2024, 09:52 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Bush/Conservatives Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC