I think Democrats should start calling the Right Prejudiced Bigots

[Homer12]

Becuase this is what 51% of the fundematalists right-wing Republican's really are.

They are Bigots. I'm a Democrat, and I label them as Bigots that are fearful of gays, fearful of muslims, and hateful of us. They are bigots wanting to deny American's rights.

Say it with me, "The Right-Wing is Full of Bigots."

[RaleighNCDem]

1. The Right-Wing is Full of Bigots,

and I live in the middle of right-wing country. Woo hoo!

[Bluzmann57]

2. Hell I've tried that

and a lot of them freely admit it. How can one fight that type of stupidity?

[LSparkle]

3. It's absolutely true

Tweety brought this up on his show last week when he wondered aloud how the Repugs can get away with telling us we need to "reach out" to rural, red state voters -- as if it's a flaw that we can't win in those areas -- while we aren't calling them on their inability to win the URBAN areas which are (surprise!) more ethnically diverse. Chimpy doesn't like going to cities (unlike previous presidents) where he might encounter "the great unwashed masses" -- he prefers to stay on his ranch with the white folks. Bigotry isn't strong enough a word for it.

[grumpy old fart]

4. War Criminals

Heck, under the Nuremberg Precedent, Bush and his thugs are war criminals. How's that for a good name. http://www.benferencz.org/murder.htm

[Name removed]

5. Deleted message

Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.

[meow2u3]

6. One problem with this

The prejudiced bigots brag about it!
Just say "twisted values"

[ProudToBeBlueInRhody]

7. See, when you do that..........

....they start whining and saying dumb shit like "You've got Robert Byrd of the KKK in your party" and "Most of the people who voted against the civil rights act of '64 were Dems". Nevermind that Byrd was in the KKK when he was a teenager and that the same people who voted against the Civil Rights Act of '64 LEFT the party because Kennedy, LBJ and Humphrey had pushed it.......

[Payne]

8. Don't forget

"Nevermind that Byrd was in the KKK when he was a teenager"

Don't forget that he was also voted in by a red state.

[Jesus W Christ]

9. Only problem is....

They might thank you.

[newyawker99]

25. Hi Jesus W Christ!!

Welcome to DU!! :toast:

[Thom Little]

10. There's no need to "start" calling them bigots.

They've been bigots for decades and we've been pointing it out for decades. It's our job to just keep on pointing out what's always been plainly obvious.

It's a never-ending job. You have to keep on telling the straight truth to the new generations. Don't let the right-wing liars get to them first.

[Name removed]

11. Deleted message

Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.

[Name removed]

12. Deleted message

Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.

[Skittles]

13. LOL

what rights? How about the right not to be tortured? How about the right to not be imprisoned without charges? How about the right to free and fair elections? I could go on and on but why bother???

[Name removed]

14. Deleted message

Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.

[Skittles]

15. OH I GET IT

our rules apply to us ONLY in America - we can torture and imprison at will outside of our borders? ARE YOU CRAZY? REPUBLICANS ARE NOW TRYING TO MAKE IT LEGAL FOR US TO TORTURE PEOPLE - READ THE F***ING NEWS FOR CHRISSAKES.

[Conker]

16. What's even worse is that they try to cover it up.

They try getting a few minorities in their party to get votes (Rice,that one hispanic judge,etc).

[Junior]

17. Is 51% correct?

Hello ... newbie here.

Calling people bigots is extreme ... if it's deserved, however then one shouldn't have a problem with speaking the truth

I read your post regarding the people you consider bigots. Could you please provide some specific examples showing this? Perhaps some kind of evidence other than the charge that you make?

For instance, where does 51% come from?

[mwooldri]

18. Bigots, no. But a suitable word needs to be found to describe them.

Extremeists?
Not fond of that one.

Zealots?
I think the meaning would be lost on them.

Revolutionists?
Hmmm... might work with that one.

Right Wing Revolutionaries. They want to cause a revolution in the country by stealth. That's what they're trying to do.

Mark.

[meow2u3]

19. Revolutionaries? That sounds too positive

We're better off calling them what they really are: TYRANTS!

[JohnWxy]

20. NEO-CONSERVATIVE RADIO POLEMICISTS

The NeoCons almost never address Democratic Policies. Instead they prefer to attack the messengers and deflect the debate by spreading dis-information and lies. When they do attack opposing policies they usually rely on disinformation to distort the truth about the efficacy of their own policies or to criticize the policies they disagree with.

go here for complete comment

[mwooldri]

21. Well if we label ourselves "Progresives"

then I guess it makes them "Regressives". The Regressive Right. That I think has a very nice ring to it.

[mymomwasright]

22. I like calling them chickenhawks better!

Most are bigotted. Especially Cheney! He's my favorite Bigot! But he's a much better chickenhawk! Can someone start a 'My favorite chickenhawk' thread?
:patriot:

[JohnWxy]

23. I LONG FOR THE GOOD OL' DAYS

for some matierial I would recommend:

[Name removed]

24. Deleted message

Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.