Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

2 SC, now Greenspan replacement. Bush has been able to choose on his

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Bush/Conservatives Donate to DU
 
patricia92243 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 10:29 AM
Original message
2 SC, now Greenspan replacement. Bush has been able to choose on his
watch. I feel depressed.

If we finally get a Democratic prez next time, will there be any likelihood of an openings on the SC. Also if the Federal Fiance Chairman is somebody crazy, can the next president appoint a new one? It's not an appointment for life like the SC. I hope, I hope.
Refresh | 0 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
tinrobot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 10:31 AM
Response to Original message
1. SC Chairman is a 7 year term
Supreme court - who knows who might retire.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
unblock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 10:34 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. it's a lifetime appointment
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
unblock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 10:32 AM
Response to Original message
2. frankly, i think it was amazing he didn't get a supreme pick 1st term.
i have to give props to o'connor, i actually think she was hanging on because she didn't want her resignation sullied by his disastrous swing vote in loser shrub v. president gore. i just wish she could hold on for 4 more years....
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Chan790 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 10:54 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. True, but...
It was equally obvious that she was not going to let her replacement be appointed by a Democrat, her response in 2000 to the initial claim of a Bush win showed that. If 2004 had been a clear Democratic lead, she'd have resigned early enough to make sure GWB got the appointment. Likewise, there was no way she was waiting until after 2008 when the GOP might (probably will hopefully) lose the WH.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
unblock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 11:04 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. i think her plans shifted once her statements became public
once people knew her bias relating to the retirement and who's president, it became unseemly for her to retire while shrub was pres.

it's also not clear that, had kerry been certified to have won, that a 'last-minute' retirement wouldn't have been stalled in the senate until kerry took over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 10:34 AM
Response to Original message
3. people knew what the issues were in 2004
in 2000 they might have ignored it, but at a minimum there is no excuse that anyone didn't know that roe v wade would be threatened, that social security and medicare would be threatened, that our entire foreign policy was based on lies

Sorry, but the freedoms we are losing are based on the apathy of the American people. They have only themselves to blame.

In the meantime, for those that still want to fight the good cause, start by backing candidates that fight for those principles, at all levels of government


Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Dec 22nd 2024, 02:57 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Bush/Conservatives Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC