<snip> Says Bork: “With a single stroke…the president has…widened the fissures within the conservative movement. That's not a bad day's work--for liberals. The wars in Afghanistan and Iraq aside, George W. Bush has not governed as a conservative (amnesty for illegal immigrants, reckless spending that will ultimately undo his tax cuts, signing a campaign finance bill even while maintaining its unconstitutionality). This George Bush, like his father, is showing himself to be indifferent, if not actively hostile, to conservative values.”
In the article written by former Reaganite and Heritage Foundation fellow Bruce Bartlett, the reader was greeted with this singular item that went directly to the heart of the argument: “The truth that is now dawning on many movement conservatives is that George W. Bush is not one of them and never has been.” <snip>
The only way I see around this scenario is to tell the president, and the Republican elite in Washington in no uncertain terms, that staying home is exactly what will happen…by design. If the Republican majority in Washington cannot unite around true conservative values and principles--the Supreme Court being the most obvious and pressing--then perhaps the GOP needs to spend another few decades wondering the political wilderness in order to rediscover it’s roots all over again. <snip>
http://www.theconservativevoice.com/articles/article.html?id=9212After Watergate, nobody would admit to voting for Nixon. It's looking more and more like we're going to see the scenario replayed with Bush II: "W? I don't know of anybody who voted for him. He's not really a conservative ..." As the foundation crumbles, an increasing number of people will be willing to contemplate the "unthinkable" possibility that there really WAS election fraud in 2000 and 2004 ...