Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Which is worse for White Collar Workers:

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Economy Donate to DU
 
srpantalonas Donating Member (372 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-16-03 03:59 PM
Original message
Poll question: Which is worse for White Collar Workers:
Offshoring is the practice of a US company outsourcing to another country, usually one with an asymetric economy like China or India. Insourcing is the practice of bringing in workers from another country and paying them substantially below market wages.

Which is affecting us more?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ramapo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-16-03 07:20 PM
Response to Original message
1. Visa abuse helped create offshoring
H1B and L1 visas have been a problem for years. These were used as a method to bring thousands of workers (mostly IT) into the US to compete in the job market with citizens. The rational was that there was an inadequate number of qualified tech workers, which was true to an extent.

Over the past years, we have provided excellent experience to foreign workers. I know from personal experience, many are now returning home to work on projects exported by US companies.

We provided a home to thousands of foreign workers, encouraging the technical education of more. A global network was created of foreign workers, creating the perfect environment for the development of the offshore industry.

Now it's great that an economy can educate and employ it's citizens. It's something that should've been done for Americans. Instead we have done it for non-citizens.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mhr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-16-03 09:52 PM
Response to Original message
2. For The Votes Touting The Salvation of Replacement Markets
Read what a FED member had to say in money magazine.

"I suspect that a large part of these net job losses -- particularly in manufacturing, airlines and telecommunications -- are permanent and will not be reversed as the economy gains steam. Instead, new jobs will need to be created in other sectors of the economy to replace them," was the cautious conclusion of Fed Governor Susan Bies last week.

And this from a JP Morgan economist:

"It would take jobs growth of 200,000 to 300,000 a month for six months or more to make a dent in unemployment," said James Glassman, senior economist at J.P. Morgan.

You might want to reconsider your views as they are not consistent with key policy makers and managers.

http://money.cnn.com/2003/10/15/news/economy/unemployment_poll.reut/index.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
srpantalonas Donating Member (372 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-21-03 04:30 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Petition: Stop Offshoring
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 12:47 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Economy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC