Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Real average weekly earnings fell by 0.3% from February to March

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Economy Donate to DU
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-20-06 08:55 AM
Original message
Real average weekly earnings fell by 0.3% from February to March

Real average weekly earnings fell by 0.3% from February to March after seasonal adjustment, according to preliminary data from the Department of Labor’s Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS). A BLS news release said a 0.2% increase in average hourly earnings was offset by a 0.5% increase in the Consumer Price Index for Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers (CPI-W).

Average weekly earnings rose by 3.7%, seasonally adjusted, from March 2005 to March 2006. After deflation by the CPI-W, average weekly earnings increased by 0.1%.

Before adjustment for seasonal change and inflation, average weekly earnings were $553.09 in March 2006, compared with $533.06 a year earlier.




http://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.toc.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
PATRICK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-20-06 09:03 AM
Response to Original message
1. A question
Lazy me, I keep hearing the infuriating media talking points ad nauseam about how during carter's gas crisis the cost of gasoline adjusted for inflation was worse than now. But with real earning declining for most Americans, a deflation to meet the inflation of prices, how is the pinch distributed? And for minimum wage people it has to start being catastrophic since the number of dollars and the percentage of income has much more impact. In a statistical way how does the median and low income earner facing 3$ a gallon compare today to that same wage earner type with $1.30 a gallon in the late seventies?

So sickening is the current tired media propaganda that when I hear "maybe $3 a gallon by this summer" I was betting on a very early summer and if people were not burning down CNN headquarters and storming the Capitol it would be $4 and climbing before the frosts melted and the robins sang.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-20-06 09:26 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. If I come across data on your questions I will post the answers - but
my current semi-part time job does not get me the resources I once had.

In terms of opinion - I also expect 3.00 plus on gas this summer - early summer. And $5 per gal has been projected by folks that assume we will be unable to restore the Iraqi oil flow that Bush's bombing and now civil war have screwed up - and Thar IRAN will get pissed at Bush and cut back production - with Venezuela turning down production a bit - and with the US oil companies continuing their pretending that Katrina damage still exists to the point that 86% - rather than last years 91% and Clinton years 98% - use of that capacity - at 86% - is all they can do.

The gas shock that hit Pres Ford, and then hit Pres Carter twice, were much larger than anything to date under Bush - but $5 a gal would change that relationship, eh? :-)

As to the affect on low wage earners, the 70's were before Reagan greed is good, trickle down properity, you are on your own, and end of the nanny government. The government's safety net for the poor and middle-class is quite weak these days compared to the 70's. But I do not have exact numbers to give you. - Sorry.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PATRICK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-20-06 10:32 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Thank you
That is more thought and help than any of the massive media outlets with career journalists and economic experts will invest in crucial reality.

from personal experience I remember the employer who was really impressed at his generosity in present my wage increase of a low salary in an impressive percentage figure that did not amount to many extra bags of groceries. Had it been more of a living wage increase it would have been 100% and of course unthinkable and outrageous. The message of course for the poor is that they hate to pay anyone anything and the flip side of this show of generosity can often be hidden resentment- and one's future unemployment. Yet what do these fractional increases actually pay for? Very little.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Delphinus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-20-06 05:47 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Patrick, here in NE Indiana,
we're already at $3 per gallon. Went up yesterday. Had been $2.79.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 06:11 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Economy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC