Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush Decides to Lift Steep Steel Tariffs

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Economy Donate to DU
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-03 10:42 AM
Original message
Bush Decides to Lift Steep Steel Tariffs
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=544&ncid=716&e=1&u=/ap/20031204/ap_on_go_pr_wh/bush_steel

Bush Decides to Lift Steep Steel Tariffs

By MARTIN CRUTSINGER, AP Economics Writer

WASHINGTON - Facing the threat of a trade war, President Bush has decided to lift steep tariffs he imposed on foreign steel 20 months ago, Republican and industry officials said Thursday.

But he will soften the blow on the domestic steel industry by announcing new measures designed to protect against unfair foreign competition, the officials said Thursday.... Among the proposals being considered by the administration was making permanent early reporting requirements to detect any big influx of steel into the United States.


The reporting program requires steel importers to apply for import licenses, giving the government a quicker way to detect possible import surges than waiting for Customs Service data when the steel arrives at U.S. ports.


The administration also was expected to pledge an aggressive use of U.S. antidumping laws to impose tariffs on specific steel products should imports surge once the tariffs are lifted.


The administration package also was expected to include pledges to continue pursuing global negotiations aimed at getting other countries to limit government subsidies for their domestic steel producers and to curb overcapacity in the steel industry.


Those talks, under way since 2002, so far have yielded little, and many trade experts don't hold out much hope that other countries will agree to U.S. demands in this area, given the political power their own steel industries wield. <snip>


http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&ncid=578&e=5&u=/nm/20031204/bs_nm/trade_usa_steel_dc

Bush Expected to Lift Steel Tariffs

By Adam Entous and Doug Palmer

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - President Bush plans to scrap steel tariffs on Thursday -- 16 months ahead of schedule under threat of retaliation from Europe and Asia -- is a move that could prove politically damaging. To cushion the blow to U.S. steel makers, Bush is expected to expand an import licensing and monitoring system to help head off surges in shipments of foreign steel into the United States. The White House could also provide federal help covering pension and health care costs. <snip>

Steel industry sources said Bush could still suspend the tariffs, not terminate them, and then try to find another way to comply with the WTO. <snip>


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bif Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-03 10:47 AM
Response to Original message
1. He just lost PA!
49 states to go.Let's see if he can piss of every other state as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
begeegs Donating Member (66 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-03 12:20 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Well...
He has already pissed off the world a few times over now, why stop there?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zbdent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-03 11:27 AM
Response to Original message
2. Is this how it will go?
Fought Kucinich on the idea of steel tariffs.

After calling DK "KOOK-in-ich" (a Rush-inspired namecalling, which would try to indicate that he didn't know how to pronounce the name, except that he actually had to be familiar with DK due to the legislation), signs the legislation.

W takes credit for "helping" the steel industry. No credit at all to Kucinich.

Now that the "tariffs" are "not working" or "hurting the industry", and are being removed, will W recognize DK's attempt to save the industry by blaming the "business unfriendly" tariffs on him?

(and somebody here said I hated Kucinich. I've defended him to quite a number of lifetime Ohio natives!)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lotteandollie Donating Member (73 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-03 12:41 PM
Response to Original message
4. It Was A Bad Idea To Begin With
We are supposed to set the example of free and fair trade. This was a lousey tariff. I'm just sorry that they had to threaten the US for us to back away.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Nov 03rd 2024, 07:44 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Economy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC