There was an article in the New York Times Sunday, December 7, 2003 called, “Who Wins and Who Loses as Jobs Move Overseas.” This interested me considering I am unemployed IT person with experience in the entertainment industry. There was something in the article that really pissed me off about labeling a job “low-skill.”
<snip>
The outsourcing of jobs to China and India is not new, but lately it has earned a chilling new adjective: professional. Advances in communications technology have enabled white-collar jobs to be shipped from the United States and Europe as never before, and the outcry form workers who once considered themselves invulnerable is creating a potent political force.
<snip>
and goes on about the participants, one particular M. Eric Johnson, director of Tuck’s Glassmeyer/McNamee Center for Digital Strategies at the Tuck School of Business, Dartmouth College
The one question and answer that really bothered me is the following:
<snip>
Q. If protectionisms the wrong answer, explain how the market, will solve this. Does government need to intervene at all?
Mr. Johnson. It’s all about innovation and productivity. As long as we maintain those two engines, we’ll continue to have a very high standard of living. Out in the Bay Area there are plenty of folks who would love to create a little bit of protectionism around their I.T. jobs, but we are far better off letting a lot of those jobs go. Low-skill jobs like coding are moving offshore and what’s let in their place are more advanced project management jobs.
<snip>
Did I not hear in the Nineteen-eighties, that employers wanted workers with more skills and that could do something step by step? In the late, Nineteen-seventies this county needed to change from a manufacturing to a service economy. This sounds like more of the same lip service. That the United States needs, “Advanced Project Managers” so we can tell the rest of the world what to do. This also sounds like more bad advice from the past.
The rest of the article is very interesting and should be read.
Here is the link for the New York Times article, but it cost money
http://query.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=F60F12F63E590C748CDDAB0994DB404482Here is the link for the International Herald Tribune, it does not cost money
http://www.iht.com/cgi-bin/generic.cgi?template=articleprint.tmplh&ArticleId=120443Unfortunately, the International Herald Tribune does not have the same edit as the New York Times does.
I am not a programmer but have done it and last thing I would say is coding is a low-skilled job. He is one thing I do know about programs is there are some that are not allowed off the continental United States for security reasons. Lotus 1-2-3 was not allowed out of the U.S. because of its double-digit accuracy. In addition, Lotus 1-2-3 was programmed from beginning to end in assembly language in the days of DOS, that is why it was so fast and did not crash!
A well-written program can make a break the function of a computer. Just ask someone whose computer crashes all of the time. We are not paying as much for the programs we purchase, but sure do a lot more now than they did in the past. Having this convince sent off shore is a bad idea in the long run.
P.S. IBM now owns Lotus 1-2-3 and has not kept up with Mircosoft Excel even though Excel is a memory hog (primary and secondary).