It appears the Feb 10, 2004 meeting with OPEC could have important implications. Meanwhile, teh Chinese are going to revalue their currency. I think we are seeing teh beginning of a real monetary shift - a new paradigm of sorts.
Gold Bugs/Libertarians say "Gold is the currency of currencies."
Joseph Stalin once said "Wheat is the currency of currencies."
I say in the industrialized world "Oil is the currency of currencies."
Comments?
***********
"L. Ron Hubbard says that governments and people in general do not look for a simple solution (Gold or Silver) but love to implement the more complex challenge (Basket of currencies). So for honest money (benevolent) to compete with the fiat (malevolent) we should also have the option of the more complex basket of asset backed currencies such as Gold, Silver, and Platinum as well as other options using consumable commodities (Oil, Coal, Natural Gas) (Wheat, Corn, Soybeans) (Beef, Pork, Chicken).
The same computer algorithm they discuss here can be used to value the honest baskets as well. This keeps the conversation on the principle that one is asset backed (real) and distributed. The other is not asset backed (fiat) and less distributed. Distribution obviously indicates how easy it is to abuse or manipulate via a few select organizations.
Notice the key statement for the basket of fiat currencies is:
“It is a flexible standard that can manage subsequent adjustments in the relative strength of different economies, including a long term relative decline of the US economy despite the present attempts to heat it up. It can adjust to the global effects of massive Keynesian policies like the current flood of dollars throughout the world.”
Surely the above Metal, Energy, Crop and Meat benevolent currencies, or a basket of all of the baskets, directly adjust according to the actual strength of different economies and eliminates the effect of Keynesian (malevolent) policies.
The question: Is the solution stated here by the Chinese an attempt to stop the looting or is it an attempt to gain more of the loot? Isn't it about time that the producers control the money and not the looters? (Ok when I come out today I will finally take your copy of Atlas Shrugged and start reading it).
I have to admit that even myself when I read the article below, thought "wonder how that would be implemented" being distracted from the principles behind it. So the theory is to give the same challenge to people to solve a problem in a benevolent vs malevolent manner.
-Steve
***comments from London on RMB revaluation***
Even if this is only informed speculation, and I note that Henry Liu has seen fit to forward it, it is potentially enormously important.
Obviously very many wonder how far the global balance of payments disparities can go, but this possible/probable answer is very informative.
It marks a relative demotion of the dollar as world money, not just in quantitative terms but in qualitative terms.
The procedures prior to the advent of the euro shows that humankind has the computerised technology smoothly to manage a basket of currencies. If China switches from a dollar peg to a basket of currencies implicitly it is saying that this is its standard for world money.
It is a flexible standard that can manage subsequent adjustments in the relative strength of different economies, including a long term relative decline of the US economy despite the present attempts to heat it up. It can adjust to the global effects of massive Keynesian policies like the current flood of dollars throughout the world.
It sets a standard for other countries to switch to as a bench mark of world money, in particular the increasing number of countries for whom trade with China is most important.
All without an overt fight about whether the dollar is replaced by the renminbi.
It is not socialism, but it is about a somewhat more socially rational, sensible management of world money.
And the computerised basket of currencies will reflect the relative strength of different economies in the world in a less mystical way than gold or silver represented world money.
Clever Chinese.
Chris
London
----- Original Message -----
From: "Henry C.K. Liu"
Subject:
RMB Revaluation - Goldman Sachs
> BEIJING, Jan. 13, (Xinhuanet) -- China will make a one-off revaluationof the yuan within the first quarter of the year and move to a trade-weighted basket of currencies to set its exchange rate by the second half, investment house Goldman Sachs said.
The measures will lead to a five percent cumulative appreciation over the next 12 months, it said.
With low interest rate expectations and yawning current account and budget deficits, the US dollar has been hitting fresh lows against the euro and other major currencies on an almost daily basis.
This is pressuring China to address its exchange rate policy, the investment bank said in a client note.
Although a 10 percent revaluation would be needed to bring the currency to fair value, it expects China to revalue the yuan by 2.5 percent against the US dollar in a "prudent first move" towards a more flexible exchange rate regime.
Goldman Sachs said that China is then likely to move from a direct US dollar peg to a crawling basket of trade-weighted currencies.
It cited a recent mainland media report which said that the government was considering linking the yuan to a basket of 11 trade-weighted currencies.
It noted, however, that because many of these were either managed against or pegged to the dollar, its composition would be 63 percent in dollars and the remainder split between the euro and yen.
Goldman Sachs said that the move to a managed basket of currencies would lead to a one percent appreciation against the basket in six months and 1.5 percent in 12 months, totaling a five percent rise in value overall.
It said that this implies an exchange rate of 8.07, 7.68 and 7.54 yuan to the dollar in three, six and 12 months respectively. The yuan will be valued at 13.00, 12.38 and 12.60 yen over these periods, it said.
End item
> (China Daily/Agencies)