Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

King Cotton’s Subsidies under Attack in the WTO as Agricultural Negotiations

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Economy Donate to DU
 
JohnWxy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-13-08 04:49 PM
Original message
King Cotton’s Subsidies under Attack in the WTO as Agricultural Negotiations
http://www.americasnet.net/Commentators/John_Curry/curry_47.pdf


The World Trade Organization (WTO) focused attention on the large subsidies the US
government gives to cotton farmers by rejecting the US claim that they do not impact
cotton production. The interim ruling accepted Brazil’s argument that US subsidies
exceed the internationally negotiated limit and thereby lose the protection of the WTO
agricultural agreement’s “peace clause,” which has shielded them from challenges up to
now. The ruling also found that Brazilian cotton farmers had been harmed by the US
subsidies, including export credit guarantees. The Bush administration said it will appeal
the WTO interim panel decision unless the final decision, due to be announced on June
18, differs from the interim ruling. Informed observers say this is unlikely.
The US Government Position


The US gave cotton farmers $12.5 billion from mid 1999 to mid 2003 and these farmers produced $13.9 billion worth of cotton. The 2001-2002 cotton crop was worth $3.08 billion and the US paid subsidies
of about $4 billion. Brazil charges that the seven different subsidies given to

LETS'S See that totals to $16.5 Billion to enable cotton farmers (2,500 of them got 78% of the money) to be competitive on international markets.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-13-08 05:02 PM
Response to Original message
1. Cotton. What states does that grow in? Alabama? Tennessee?
Edited on Sat Dec-13-08 05:02 PM by Joanne98
Maybe those states that are trying to bust the auto unions.

Let's CUT THEM OFF NEXT YEAR! THEY MAKE TOO MUCH MONEY!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tumbulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-13-08 05:31 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. CA, AZ, NM, TX, OK, and the SE US
The money mainly goes to buy ag chemicals as if you do the math you can see that there is very little profit. It pays for fertilizers and pesticides and storage facilities. It funds agribusiness all over the southern US, mostly the western states.

Cotton grows on land that nothing else will grow on. The farmers who grow more valuable crops call it "poverty weed".

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnWxy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-14-08 05:14 PM
Response to Original message
3. Actually Texas appears to be the leading state in terms of cotton production. Alabama comes in
about eighth!

http://www.cottonusa.org/directories/BuyersGuide.cfm?ItemNumber=1545&sn.ItemNumber=1080&tn.ItemNumber=1105

WTo found us in violation of free trade practices a few years ago. bush admin has been ignoring them. The big cotton producers are mostly corporate farms.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CanonRay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-15-08 09:28 AM
Response to Original message
4. Good thing it doesn't grow in Michigan or there wouldn't be any subsidy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 06:42 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Economy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC