Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

the formerly unthinkable -- is a military career the best option for grads?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Economy Donate to DU
 
grasswire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-09 12:00 PM
Original message
the formerly unthinkable -- is a military career the best option for grads?
A very liberal single mother I know is pondering the formerly unthinkable. Should she rethink her strong opposition to the military for her high school senior, considering the state of the economy?

1. He comes from a family of Air Force Academy grads: grandfather and three uncles.

2. Entering the Air Force would give him insulation from economic distress all his life. He would have college education, health care, retirement, employment.

3. The military will be under the command of Democrats for at least eight years.

4. The military needs non wing-nuts, doesn't it? It needs the morality and worldview of liberals.

5. It looks as if student loans will dry up, and that the chances of even a minimum-wage job are slim.

6. He enjoys physical challenge and enjoys the comraderie of a team.

Would it be a total betrayal of liberal principles for her to drop her opposition to him serving in the Air Force?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-09 12:04 PM
Response to Original message
1. It would not.
Edited on Sat Jan-10-09 12:05 PM by HypnoToad
Nothing wrong with serving one's country.

And if a Democrat isn't elected or Obama re-elected in 4 years, then your "eight years" prediction will be void. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mikita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-09 12:06 PM
Response to Original message
2. I think this is part of the 'plan'
IMHO it is no accident that 'serving' is looking better than the alternative. That way, we can continue to have a volunteer group to continue the elites' bidding. And you don't get as many protests when there is no draft.....

Personally, I find it REALLY sad that "military under the command of Democrats" seems like a safer bet. They are no better when it comes to serving our corporate masters.

I feel sad for those having to make these kinds of decisions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Citizen Number 9 Donating Member (878 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-09 12:14 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. I feel more sad
for those who have such a limited and tight-minded view of the world.

Those corporate masters have really got you boxed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
morningglory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-09 12:28 PM
Response to Reply #2
12. A post on here the other day said military service is neocon's WPA.
I agree, if we didn't have 150,000 / 10,000,000 people serving in the military, that would be 150,000 unemployed people, up to 10,000,000 (however many, I am not sure). When they deploy out of Iraq/Afghanistan/Pakistan/Gaza, that will contribute so many Timothy McVeighs on the streets with PTS syndrome, and no way to make a living. It is going to have to be dealt with by Pres Obama, along with multitudinous Dipstick* failures. McVeigh was an ace tank commander, much decorated who got RIF'ed out of the military after first Gulf war, and when he got home, McDonald's was not hiring ace tank commanders, just burger flippers, which was not attractive to him, and he flipped out in anger at the government. I am not saying all military are TMcV type people, but many will be stressed beyond ability to live on our streets. In our county the local news said yesterday (we are a military town in the south) that the food bank closed--not enough food--the day labor company closed. What are we going to do with hungry people on the streets with no jobs available? If they don't have family, the only solution is to rob a bank and get incarcerated for a bed and meals, or some such thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Citizen Number 9 Donating Member (878 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-09 12:12 PM
Response to Original message
3. Sounds like an educational opportunity for both grad and mother
As long as all the parties realize and understand that we are at war right now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grasswire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-09 12:16 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. just go away (eom)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Citizen Number 9 Donating Member (878 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-09 12:25 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Mother doesn't want to be educated?
That's common enough that there's no shame in it anymore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fasttense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-09 01:16 PM
Response to Reply #9
18. Is there an economic topic you wont soil with your neocon agenda?
Edited on Sat Jan-10-09 01:18 PM by fasttense
We are at war and the bush is a war pResident cause he started an occupation with imaginary WMDs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-09 04:32 PM
Response to Reply #18
23. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Nipper1959 Donating Member (322 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-09 12:13 PM
Response to Original message
4. Socialism
I have to laugh at conservatives because they hate socialism but love for people to live the socialised life in the service.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-11-09 08:08 AM
Response to Reply #4
25. The military isn't just socialist--it's practically a commie dictatorship
The nanny state takes care of food and shelter, and dictates how you will spend all your waking hours.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Citizen Number 9 Donating Member (878 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-11-09 10:51 AM
Response to Reply #25
28. Isn't great that we've taken care to
put it and keep it under civilian control all these years?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-11-09 04:40 PM
Response to Reply #28
31. This has what to do with institutional structure? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Citizen Number 9 Donating Member (878 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-11-09 06:11 PM
Response to Reply #31
36. The military.
It's totally and completely under civilian control, and always has been, right?


By convention and by law.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-09 12:20 AM
Response to Reply #36
37. So? Its organizational structure is a communist dictatorship n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fed_up_mother Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-14-09 11:22 AM
Response to Reply #25
38. True. Who doesn't the military pay recruits enough to support a family?
Because if Uncle Sam wanted you to get married, he would have issued you a spouse!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrreowwr_kittty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-15-09 01:38 AM
Response to Reply #25
41. Something that is lost on so many military and ex-military folks.
But the worst ones are DOD employees and defense contractors. They love them some Republican anti-government rhetoric, while sucking on the government teat the whole time. :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-09 12:15 PM
Response to Original message
6. Well, now that we will no longer have a madman in charge
a four year enlistment makes a certain amount of sense. I always hate to admit it, but the military has been the making of a lot of kids, teaching them self reliance, how to clean up after themselves, to grow up.

Civilian life can teach the same lessons but it generally takes a bit longer. The military accomplishes it in boot camp.

The military has a long and colorful history of using enlisted men as guinea pigs for CIA experiments, but the statistics favor escaping that fate. I dislike the military thoroughly but realize a defense force is a necessary evil in this age of nations. I am not temperamentally suited to a military life but know plenty of good people who are. This kid sounds like one of them.

A year ago I'd have discouraged it completely. This year, not so much.

The military, used to taking anything that drew breath for the last 8 years, will now find itself in the position of being picky.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Citizen Number 9 Donating Member (878 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-09 12:15 PM
Response to Original message
7. What's wrong with the Peace Corps?
I know three young people in there right now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-09 12:26 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. They don't let you shoot people
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Citizen Number 9 Donating Member (878 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-09 12:33 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. As attractive as that might be for you
there are other things in life. :wow:






Young grads should check out what the Peace Corps has to offer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-09 01:14 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. Really, I needed a sarcasm tag for that? Really?
Sigh.. satire is truly dead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GliderGuider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-09 01:43 PM
Response to Reply #17
21. Not for human readers
Unfortunately, there's an even chance the entity who responded to you is a bot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Citizen Number 9 Donating Member (878 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-09 04:25 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. It's true.
You see all kinds on the Internet. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pokercat999 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-09 12:26 PM
Response to Original message
11. As long as he/she doesn't mind being told to kill brown or
yellow poor people.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SheilaT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-09 12:30 PM
Response to Original message
13. It's not as though there are literally
no jobs out there and 100% of the non military workforce is unemployed.

As for the student loan question, if the kid in question doesn't qualify for merit aid or a lot of need based aid, then the way to go is to start at the local junior college and after two years transfer to the best state university possible. Or go into something like CAD (computer aided design) or welding or medical records or any one of the very many vocational tracks that our community colleges do a very good job of teaching. Heck, plumbers aren't ever going to be outsourced and they make decent money. I know a guy here in Santa Fe who does computer support for small companies and private individuals. He charges $95/hour for individuals, $125/hour for businesses, and he's turning away business.

All that said, if the kid is comfortable with the idea of a career in the military, then he should enlist, and hopefully with his mother's blessing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyTiedye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-09 12:34 PM
Response to Original message
15. Wrong, Wrong, Wrong!
Edited on Sat Jan-10-09 12:35 PM by AndyTiedye
1. He comes from a family of Air Force Academy grads: grandfather and three uncles.

Our government treated our military personnel a lot better in those days.

2. Entering the Air Force would give him insulation from economic distress all his life. He would have college education, health care, retirement, employment.

The military now has a "use 'em up and dump 'em" policy.

3. The military will be under the command of Democrats for at least eight years.

Only one Democratic President has won re-election in my lifetime.

4. The military needs non wing-nuts, doesn't it? It needs the morality and worldview of liberals.

Such viewpoints are NOT welcome in the military. Sometimes with extreme prejudice.

5. It looks as if student loans will dry up, and that the chances of even a minimum-wage job are slim.

State schools are still an option. If there are no jobs in 4 years, Obama won't have a chance of being re-elected, and we'll have the mad cowboys back in power.

6. He enjoys physical challenge and enjoys the comraderie of a team.

Exercise is healthy, bullets, depleted uranium, IEDs, etc., not so much.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GliderGuider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-09 12:45 PM
Response to Original message
16. Follow the arc of service out into the future
Just as those who volunteered for the US army in 2000 had no idea they'd be asked to do the unthinkable in Iraq, we have no guarantee that current volunteers won't be asked to do equally (or even more) unpalatable things a few years down the road. Given what's likely to happen to the economy over the next scant few years, this bears thinking about.

Might army units in 2011 be ordered to fire on crowds of American civilians protesting food or fuel shortages? Will they be ordered to fire on civilian crowds angry because they can't get their money out of banks? Or perhaps on crowds of ordinary citizens enraged by massive home foreclosures?

Might a volunteer who depends on the army for their bed and board feel reluctant to disobey such orders?

Is the promise of three squares a day, a roof and some structure worth the price of one's soul? It will be for many...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uben Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-09 01:20 PM
Response to Original message
19. My future son-in-law just re-upped
He has been in the AF reserve and has already done a tour in Iraq. He left last saturday for Afghanistan. He proposed to my daughter the day before he left. When he returns, he will be getting his commercial helocopter license, thanks to the military benefits!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hawkowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-11-09 05:16 AM
Response to Reply #19
24. Egads!
What is he going to do with a commcercial heliocopters license?!? Job prospects for helicopter pilots are always very bleak without several thousand hours of experience. Stay away from professional aviation (too late for me, as I am an airline pilot)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fasttense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-09 01:36 PM
Response to Original message
20. I served 20 years in the military.
I have always been a liberal. I had many, many disagreements with my fellow officers, but I got promoted and was pretty successful. I made good pay and got to see the world.

I have been considering the same thing for my son. I wont let him go near the military until after the bush has removed himself from the White House.

I was in when the bush 1st took over and all the talk turned to torture. I was more afraid of my son having to defend himself from neocon military personnel promoting torture then in him getting killed by the enemy.

I am planning to wait about six months to see what Obama does in Afghanistan and what he does about torture, before I recommend my son join the Navy.

I would recommend your friend wait for about six months too. If you figure it takes about 2 months to finish boot-camp, and another 3 to 4 months to finish an A school (That's a Navy term for training in a specialty after boot-camp. Almost all new recruits have follow on orders to a training school.) Our sons wont see the "real" military for about a year after Obama becomes President.

I think with a rational caring person as Commander In Chief, military life wont be so dangerous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-11-09 08:10 AM
Response to Original message
26. I think it would be great if we could repurpose our military for actual defense
Under both parties, it's mainly an instrument of imperial bullying.

In order to join myself, I'd have to trust that our ruling elite would use my life, if necessary, for actual defense. That hasn't happened since the end of WW II. The upside to a Dem administration is smart imperialism instead of stupid imperialism. With the former, at least fewer people tend to be killed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
2Design Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-11-09 09:36 AM
Response to Reply #26
27. Exactly - that was the last war that was legit and for good reason
the rest of these are political and killing off young people and stuffing the pockets of corporatist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NMDemDist2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-11-09 02:47 PM
Response to Original message
29. the Air Force is a good bet. the food is good and the officers are the ones in harm's way
usually

the enlisted men are usually at the rear taking care of the planes and don't usually have to get into a shooting war
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-11-09 03:42 PM
Response to Original message
30. The best advice is from "grandfather and three uncles", not uninformed, biased anonymous posters on
the internet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GliderGuider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-11-09 04:46 PM
Response to Reply #30
32. Yes. After all, the advice of four Air Force Academy grads is sure to be unbiased...
There's absolutely nothing wrong with searching out other perspectives on a topic like this, especially when the decision is so life-altering.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-11-09 05:07 PM
Response to Reply #32
33. LOL! Do you seek medical advice on an Internet forum? That's certainly life-altering. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GliderGuider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-11-09 05:42 PM
Response to Reply #33
34. Not joining the army won't kill you. Taking the wrong advice on cancer treatment might.
Major medical treatment is not optional, joining the army is. Choosing one form of treatment over another is not a matter of preference. Joining the army is.

While I would not seek medical advice on the internet, asking for various perspectives on military service seems eminently reasonable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-11-09 05:50 PM
Response to Reply #34
35. I know many academy graduates from 2nd Lt to flag rank and not one of them would mislead anyone
about a career in our armed forces.

I don't believe a grandfather and three uncles would be dishonest with a family member but I do believe anonymous posters on the Internet are basically pushing their own opposition to service in their replies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anigbrowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-14-09 02:36 PM
Response to Original message
39. It's an option. I've knowna lot of military liberals
Of course I've met a few ex-military wingnuts as well, but I don't think there is anything inherently wrong with serving in the armed forces. Intelligent people tend to do well there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrreowwr_kittty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-15-09 12:23 AM
Response to Original message
40. Well ultimately it's not her choice.
Unless he's trying to enlist at 17 and needs parental permission. Once he's 18 he's free to do what he wants. Sounds like he's a smart kid from a good family and they are all well-informed. I especially agree with you on point 4. A military full of reactionary religious zealots is not a good thing. One of many reasons why I kinda think mandatory national service or even a draft might not be a bad idea.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 02:34 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Economy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC