|
Edited on Sat Jan-17-09 07:29 AM by zazen
I work with universities here in NC, and administration costs, as Marc Bousquet in _How the University Works_ more eloquently argues, have gone through the roof over the past 20 years relative to faculty/staff/student expenses, parallel with the corporate world's growing disparity between CEO pay and the average worker. Not only do upper admins routinely dispense higher pay raises on themselves and their colleagues (all so that they can continue to recruit the most "competitive" fellow administrator candidates), but I've seen some grossly incompetent admins keep their jobs for years, raking in hundreds of thousands of dollars and actually _impeding_ quality services while lecturers in English departments work 60-80 hours a week teaching 100 students/semester and make less then 20K/yr with benefits.
So at a particular university, _all_ of the adjuncts/lecturers in the English department, who work for pittances anyway, were summarily dismissed in the Fall so that the sections are now taught--surprise--ONLINE (slave labor for the remaining), while no upper admins have talked about or taken any pay cuts. Why can't they at least start with a sort of graduated 1-5% cut on people making 150K or more per year? Yet, the State of NC is now talking about having to let some SPA staff at the universities go, in addition to cutting most discretionary spending and freezing all but the most critical vacant positions (and "critical" depends on how much pull you have). That'd save hundreds of positions if all the state universities did this.
And a certain university system president is an independent multimillionaire. Wouldn't the class act be to work for a year for a dollar? The salary they'd save would pay several staff in general administration for a year.
I suggested this to my ex, who's a faculty member and faculty rep, who brought it up at one of their budget cutting "brainstorming" sessions. Apparently it was received with gasps.
GRRRRRRRR.
|