Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

House votes to extend unemployment benefits(DOA in Senate)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Economy Donate to DU
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-04 04:11 PM
Original message
House votes to extend unemployment benefits(DOA in Senate)

http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/02/05/congress.unemployment/index.html




House votes to extend unemployment benefits
From Ted Barrett CNN

WASHINGTON (CNN) --Thirty-nine Republicans in the House of Representatives crossed party lines to join Democrats in approving a measure that would extend the unemployment benefits for about 375,000 people whose regular benefits have run out for six-months.

The vote may be little more than symbolic, lawmakers from both parties predicted, because opposition from GOP leaders is expected to prevent the measure from ever becoming law, which means unemployed workers are unlikely to receive the benefits.

The measure, which would extend the temporary federal unemployment insurance benefits, was attached to an unrelated bill dealing with community block grants.

Democrats hailed the vote as evidence that there is majority support in the GOP-controlled House for the extension -- an issue Democrats have pushed for months.

But House Majority Leader Tom DeLay, R-Texas, dismissed the vote as a "clever political stunt" designed to give the Democrats fodder for the campaign season.<snip>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
GainesT1958 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-04 04:14 PM
Response to Original message
1. No, that was a bill to help people who are hurting...
The "clever political stunt" would be passing a constitutional amendment denying gay couples basic civil rights. Delay--WHAT a BASTARD!:mad:

B-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frodo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-04 04:15 PM
Response to Original message
2. WOW! I didn't expect that.
I suppose it's just never going to come up in the Senate right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bonhomme Richard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-04 04:15 PM
Response to Original message
3. If this doesn't signal that the repugs.......
Edited on Fri Feb-06-04 04:16 PM by Oz
are worried then I don't know what does. Most couldn't give a shit about extending unemployment benefits so it's now cover their ass mode and protecting their phony baloney jobs.
I think more and more are going to try to come across as good guys and begin to distance themselves from bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ET Awful Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-04 04:22 PM
Response to Original message
4. They couldn't possibly let that pass. . . .
If they did, the unemployment numbers would suddenly show 7% or higher, there's no way they can allow that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-04 05:18 PM
Response to Original message
5. It has to be DOA in Senate
Edited on Fri Feb-06-04 05:18 PM by DanSpillane
because if it passes, the unemployment rate will "jump" again if ex-workers are put on the rolls again.

That is what the "fall" was all about--people were taken off the rolls so don't count anymore in the pct figure.

Ditto the above message!
 Add to my Journal Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 10:08 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Economy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC