Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

French public deficit widens to 4.1 percent of GDP in 2003

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Economy Donate to DU
 
La_Serpiente Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-04 03:26 AM
Original message
French public deficit widens to 4.1 percent of GDP in 2003
French public deficit widens to 4.1 percent of GDP in 2003

PARIS (AFP) - France's public deficit widened to 4.1 percent of output last year from 3.2 percent in 2002, the national statistics institute INSEE reported.

The shortfall, which INSEE reported to the European Union (news - web sites)'s executive commission, is well in excess of eurozone rules requiring member countries to hold public deficits to three percent or less of gross domestic product.

INSEE also said that France's public debt amounted to 63 percent of (GDP (news - web sites)) in 2003, up from 58.6 percent in 2002.

more...

French public deficit widens to 4.1 percent of GDP in 2003
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Frodo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-04 07:02 AM
Response to Original message
1. Where are we?
Public debt around 70-75% of GDP?

Annual deficit of 5% or so?



What are the consequences of breaking the Eurozone rules? And isn't Germany in the same boat?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-04 09:41 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Consequences are none, it seems
Yes, Germany was in the same boat as France in 2002. They persuaded the rest of the Eurozone to do nothing about it - which pissed off some countries that had struggled to meet the rules.

Some economists say the 3% rule is too restrictive - that you should be able to run higher deficits in some years, if they're made up for at other times. But without rules to specifiy what is OK, it seems to come down to the economic clout of countries that decides what they can and can't do - which doesn't look good for the future, in my opinion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PROGRESSIVE1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-03-04 09:51 PM
Response to Original message
3. This is a mistake. In the long run, high debt is bad for the economy....
and for the future generations, aka, your children.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 11:35 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Economy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC