http://seekingalpha.com/article/176558-why-bernanke-should-be-fired">Seeking Alpha:
Frankly speaking, reappointing Bernanke would be a reward for many failures, both as an economic theorist, and as Fed Chairman.
Back in 2003, Mr. Bernanke was a member of Alan Greenspan’s Federal Reserve Board of Governors. The housing bubble was already blooming, but, at that time, there was still an opportunity to keep it under control. Primarily, the nascent bubble was the result of ultra-low interest rates, championed by Mr. Bernanke, and agreed to by Greenspan. Transcripts of the Fed Meetings at that time indicate that Bernanke was a driving force behind the huge increase in so-called "liquidity" and abnormally low interest rates. He continued to support keeping rates abnormally low when his then-boss, Alan Greenspan, began to slowly raise them, in 2003. Indeed, until 2004, he not only wanted to keep rates abnormally low, but, more disturbing, he wanted to reduce rates below 1%. Had Bernanke gotten his way, the housing bubble would have been even bigger than it was, and the resulting collapse we are now experiencing would have been even deeper.
But, the mistakes didn’t end there. During his confirmation hearings in 2005, Bernanke stated:
With respect to their safety, derivatives, for the most part, are traded among very sophisticated financial institutions and individuals who have considerable incentive to understand them and to use them properly.
As we all now know, derivatives were a key factor that caused the current Financial Crisis. Many others were warning about the dangers inherent in uncovered derivative obligations. Yet, Benjamin Bernanke, supposedly a knowledgeable economist, was entirely oblivious to the danger. But, that's not all. There’s much more.
http://seekingalpha.com/article/176558-why-bernanke-should-be-fired">continued...
From Nomi Prins
http://www.thedailybeast.com/blogs-and-stories/2009-12-02/ten-reasons-bernanke-should-hit-the-road/">10 Reasons Bernanke Should Be Fired:
1) His view of what constitutes “transparency” is dubious. About 300 members of Congress have thrown their support behind Ron Paul’s HR1207 Audit the Fed bill, which would further inspect the Fed’s clandestine love affair with the big banks. But Bernanke has told Congress that providing too much detail about what the Fed did for the banks would be “counterproductive.” Thus, the man who wrote in a pre-emptive Washington Post op-ed that “In its making of monetary policy, the Fed is highly transparent” doesn’t feel the same way about its Wall Street Welfare strategy.
2) He’s managed to raise more anti-Fed sentiment than any other Fed leader. Senator Bernie Sanders (I-VT) put a hold on Bernanke’s confirmation Wednesday, meaning it would take 60 senators to override Sanders to confirm Bernanke, instead of a simple majority. The chairman of the Senate Banking Committee, Christopher Dodd (D-CT), has called for stripping the Federal Reserve of its supervisory powers. “StopBailoutBen” petitions litter the Internet. Many other Washingtonians have called for a reduction in the Fed’s powers, even as others, notably President Obama and Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner, want to pile it on thicker.
3) Bernanke didn’t have a clue or a prevention strategy during the buildup to the second biggest financial crisis in U.S. history. Despite being a noted scholar of the first Great Depression, he missed the rapid increase in foreclosures during 2006 and 2007, the $14 trillion subprime-related toxic asset bubble, $2 trillion buildup of collateralized debt obligations, extreme leverage buildup that laced past mega-profits, labyrinth of off-book bank games, and every credit derivatives issue.
4) He abetted the notion of too big to fail. Bernanke instigated a slew of new bank mergers that have rendered the biggest banks bigger and more complex, and harder to regulate than ever before. In 2004, the five largest U.S. banks held 34 percent of all commercial bank assets; today they hold 48 percent.
5) He invited investment banks to come under the federal subsidy tent. Moniker changes approved by the Fed on Bernanke’s watch mean that former investment banks Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley became bank holding companies, with access to federal perks, despite taking investment banking-type risk.
http://www.thedailybeast.com/blogs-and-stories/2009-12-02/ten-reasons-bernanke-should-hit-the-road/">continued
Or, take your pick:
http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/12/whalen-person-of-the-year-bernanke-failed-miserably">Chris Whalen: Ben Bernanke Failed Miserably
http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/money_co/2009/08/while-much-or-most-of-wall-street-seems-to-believe-that-ben-s-bernanke-deserves-a-second-term-as-federal-reserve-chairman-2.html">Money&Company: How Bernanke Failed Us
http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/money_co/2009/08/while-much-or-most-of-wall-street-seems-to-believe-that-ben-s-bernanke-deserves-a-second-term-as-federal-reserve-chairman-2.html">Naked Capitalism: Tell Your Senator No On Bernanke
http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2009/12/three-strikes-on-ben-bernanke-aig-goldman-sachs-bactarp/">The Big Picture: Three Strikes on Ben Bernanke: AIG, Goldman Sachs & BAC/TARPLet me know if you want some more..