Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Rutgers’ Chinese Solar Panels Show Clean-Energy Shift

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Economy Donate to DU
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-25-10 12:25 PM
Original message
Rutgers’ Chinese Solar Panels Show Clean-Energy Shift
July 23 (Bloomberg) -- At Rutgers University in New Jersey, 7,600 panels convert sunlight into electricity, saving some $200,000 in energy costs this year in the biggest solar-power experiment at a U.S. college.

Yingli Green Energy Holding Co., China’s second-largest solar-panel maker, supplied the $10 million project. Yingli is one of several Chinese manufacturers that have slashed costs to reduce global prices for solar modules by about 50 percent in two years. The drive made them more affordable for buyers from Rutgers to Wal-Mart Stores Inc., the biggest U.S. retailer.

“It’s all about economics,” said Chief Executive Officer Al Bucknam of SunDurance Energy, the South Plainfield, New Jersey, installer that picked Yingli over Western competitors on price and helped sell the deal to Rutgers as a money-saver.

China is slashing prices and moving to dominate solar energy in the way Japanese manufacturers ruled consumer electronics decades ago. The price declines inch the cost of solar energy toward what’s called grid parity, or renewable electricity at the same prices charged for conventional power.

“The ability of the Chinese to manufacture at scale is a very big reason why the cost of these panels has come down,” said Kathleen A. McGinty at venture capital firm Element Partners in Radnor, Pennsylvania. “They’re a big part of the reason why we can even start to talk about grid parity.”

Price Parity

Sun power may become as cheap as the retail price of grid- delivered electricity in certain markets as early as 2013, according to a June 29 report by Pike Research, a Boulder, Colorado, clean-energy consultant.

The European Photovoltaic Industry Association, a trade group, forecasts parity by 2010 in some southern parts of Italy, by 2012 in several regions of Spain, and 2015 in Germany.

Solar installations are spreading worldwide as governments from China to the U.K. and Italy offer subsidies, costs fall and cities seek to create jobs. Rutgers got a New Jersey state grant for half its solar plant costs, which included installation and an undisclosed price for the Yingli panels. Wal-Mart last month finished installing solar modules on two California stores that provide as much as 30 percent of their electricity.

China’s manufacturers grabbed 43 percent of the global photovoltaic-panel market in the last six years, pricing products as much as 20 percent cheaper than European offerings, according to Bloomberg New Energy Finance. Chinese firms shipped 3,300 megawatts of panels worth $6.6 billion last year, enough to power about 2.6 million U.S. homes.

Asia’s ‘Vast Factories’

http://noir.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601109&sid=aRsECd.1at58&pos=12

While we were fighting with the lowlife lying scumbag conservatives about stimulis, the Chinese grabbed the ball and ran with it!

Refresh | +14 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
jtuck004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-25-10 01:03 PM
Response to Original message
1. I wish I could recommend this to the front page as a permanent fixture

but I fear it won't do any good. We have been talking about it for months, but very few people seem to get it. I wonder if we could make it an app on an iphone - it runs, sends all your contact information overseas, destroys your phone and signs you up for a 20 year plan at a higher price. (I wish that was funny, or at least a bad analogy).

I was at a friend's home on the 4th. One of her guests is one of a handful of global experts in polysilicone. He had worked at plants in the U.S., but now contracts in China because all the plants and jobs are there.

China has 40 polysilicone plants under construction or operating, they are investing Billions to stimulate their country for manufacturing. The theory here for years is that we can export the handwork, and do the expensive design side. The shortfall of that is that not everyone wants to be design engineers, architects, doctors, etc, which removes the good working jobs that pay people to buy the things they are manufacturing - the way many in our country found a better life until about 40 years ago.

The U.S. has complained for years that China is copying us, they have no innovation, and are taking our jobs. While we are doing that they are sending people to school like mad with the express aim of developing design engineers that can do the innovation side as well. They have decided to take the lead in alternative energy and silicon, two things the future is likely to need in great quantities.

I saw an article about a week ago that said China just surpassed us in oil demand, and they haven't industrialized anywhwere near their whole country yet. So they are getting their oil lined up, and investing in what will take it's place, just like we should be doing.

We desperately need to have people in the administration who will invest in this country, yet right now we have a Federal Reserve Chairman, an avowed supply-sider and Republican, who is attemtpting to re-inflate the financial firms that brought us to the crisis we are in with taxpayer dollars, More here..., and an administration who publicly states that they are on the same page. This policy is quite likely to keep wealth moving into the hands of the people who already have much of it, and keep unemployment high for a long time. And it will play in the hands of our opponents like a fiddle in the hands of a master, despite all the noble accomplishements of the current government.

Damn. Unemployment is gonna be high out to 2020, at least, barring any new big technology surprises or policy changes. And people are gonna lose much of their social safety net. And we are doing it to ourselves...


Thanks for that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Crazy Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-25-10 01:35 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Clean energy was the only possible economic boom for us but it's now gone
Like the dot-com boom in the 90s and the housing boom the past decade, alternative and renewable energy should have been our next big growth and financial boom. Research, development, manufacturing and sales, rebuilding the majority of our infrastructure and autos with green energy would have probably created a labor shortage in this country for the next ten years but now it will never happen and there's really nothing new out there that will be the next boom except maybe more wars.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
blue97keet Donating Member (390 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-29-10 02:50 PM
Response to Reply #1
10. The factories making solar panels in China powered by what? Solar panels?
Methinks not. Now that's energy efficiency for ya. What's the global efficiency equation overall?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
westerebus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-25-10 01:24 PM
Response to Original message
2. Has any one seen my extra $trillion?
You know, the one I was going to use for green jobs? I know I had an extra $ trillion lying around here some where.

May be in my other suit. The G-20 bark blue one. Nope not there.

Who moved my $ trillion? Dam, I hate when that happens.

I looked under the HCR bill and it's not there.

Ben said he hasn't seen it.

Not in the Fin reg folder either. Not that Goldman wouldn't screw that pooch too.

Nancy said she has not idea where it could have gone.

BP can only change half a $ trillion, so they say.

Harry said he didn't know we had an extra $ trillion.

There it is.

Pay to the order of Af-Pak.

Dam. I though I lost it. Wow. What a relief.

Exports? Jobs?

What was the question?

Faux news said......

And so it goes.


Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Sentath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-25-10 08:45 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Thats excellent.
Got a laugh out of a friend with it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
westerebus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-26-10 06:53 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. Thanks. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
blue97keet Donating Member (390 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-29-10 02:41 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. The six hundred trillion derivatives market
or toxic toys from China. That's where our "green jobs" went.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
autorank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-25-10 10:09 PM
Response to Original message
5. k*r
Yes indeed. But didn't you hear, tax cuts provide infinite power;) to the 'leet!
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
pscot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-26-10 11:30 AM
Response to Original message
7. Free marked capitalism will save us
Any day now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
upi402 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-10 12:45 PM
Response to Original message
8. We need an immediate National Recovery Act II -for solar, wind, batteries
If we are to ever recover we need to do this AND re-install tariffs that match what other countries impose on us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Dec 21st 2024, 09:31 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Economy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC