Why Are Taxpayers Subsidizing Facebook, and the Next Bubble?

[Joanne98]

Simon Johnson, the former chief economist at the International Monetary Fund, is the co-author of “13 Bankers.”

Goldman Sachs is investing $450 million of its own money in Facebook, at a valuation that implies the social-networking company is now worth $50 billion. Goldman is also creating a fund that will offer its high-net-worth clients an opportunity to invest in Facebook.

On the face of it, this might seem just like what the financial sector is supposed to be doing – channeling money into productive enterprise. The Securities and Exchange Commission is reportedly looking at the way private investors will be involved, but there are more deeply unsettling factors at work here.

Remember that Goldman Sachs is now a bank-holding company – a status it received in September 2008, at the height of the financial crisis, in order to avoid collapse (see Andrew Ross Sorkin’s blow-by-blow account in “Too Big to Fail” for the details.)

This means that it has essentially unfettered access to the Federal Reserve’s discount window – that is, it can borrow against all kinds of assets in its portfolio, effectively ensuring it has government-provided liquidity at any time.


http://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/01/06/why-are-taxpayers-subsidizing-facebook-and-the-next-bubble/

[xchrom]

1. Recommend

[DCKit]

2. Scam nt

[kickysnana]

3. Next up Groupon. It is getting silly out there. n/t

[GeorgeGist]

4. The productive enterprise of which you speak ...

is Social Data Mining.

[ellenfl]

5. reminds one of the bursting of the tech bubble of the 90s. eom