The key upshot is this: European central banks took on increasing amounts of leveraged debt--partly from the same fiscal insanity that plagued the Anglosphere, and partly by buying up bonds from less stable economies such as Greece and Iceland. Pretty much every European nation except Iceland made the decision to socialize the financial industry's losses and turn the banks' private debt into public debt. The only problem is that there's far more banking debt out there due to leverage, than the collective economies of the Eurozone nations have to bail them out with. The Eurozone problems are not a result of overly generous social welfare systems, but rather of the combination of those systems with an attempt to take on debts of their banking institutions. Fairly soon, none of the Eurozone nations will be able to stand up under the weight of those needlessly undertaken obligations, in part because the inflexible structure of the Euro has made it such that the entire Eurozone sinks or swims together.
The nations of the Eurozone have two choices here: either let their big banks fail under the weight of their leverage, or radically restructure their societies and social compacts at the expense of their people, in order to protect their banks. So far, most Eurozone nations are choosing the latter.
The case of Iceland is particularly interesting here. Icelanders decided not to bail out their banks, but rather to let them fail, leave the bondholders who risked investment in the nation's banks out to dry. Icelanders have decided start over while taking care of their people first, and foreign bondholders last. That reasonable and moral approach has been met with outrage by most of the world's financial elites; Britain is now suing for remuneration on behalf of British investors in Icelandic banks.
...
But as the financial sector continues to careen further and further out of control worldwide, the challenge faced by sovereigns worldwide is this: either become subservient entities to the global financial institutions that truly govern the fates of the world's citizens, or reassert their authority and independence while allowing reckless banking institutions to fail.
Most nations are choosing the former, both because they lack the courage to do the latter, and because they lack the vision to imagine what kind of system might need to be created in a post-too-big-to-fail world. The world's economies are now massively interdependent, with most of those interdependencies lubricated by liquidity provided by the big banks.
http://digbysblog.blogspot.com/2011/08/big-choice-by-david-atkins.html
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
