Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Employment in the U.S. "unexpectedly" stagnated in August

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Economy Donate to DU
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-02-11 07:57 AM
Original message
Employment in the U.S. "unexpectedly" stagnated in August

(Bloomberg) Employment in the U.S. unexpectedly stagnated in August and the jobless rate held at 9.1 percent as American employers became less confident in the strength of the recovery.

Payrolls were unchanged last month, the weakest reading since September 2010, after an 85,000 gain in July that was less than initially estimated, Labor Department data showed today in Washington. The median forecast in a Bloomberg News survey called for a rise of 65,000. Hourly earnings and hours worked both declined. The August data included a 48,000 drop in information industry jobs, mostly reflecting striking Verizon Communications Inc. (VZ) workers.

The first U.S. credit downgrade, political squabbling over the budget and mounting fear of a default in Europe caused the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index to plummet 17 percent from July 22 to Aug. 8, prompting companies and consumers to cut back. The lack of hiring is one reason Federal Reserve Chairman Ben S. Bernanke last week said the central bank still has tools available to stimulate growth.

“Net employment flat-lined in August,” Ellen Zentner, a senior U.S. economist at Nomura Securities International Inc. in New York, who forecast a decline of 5,000, said before the report. “When the outlook is uncertain, businesses don’t hire. Calls that we’re on the cusp of a recession or already there are not completely unwarranted.” ...........(more)

The complete piece is at: http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-09-02/employment-in-u-s-unexpectedly-stagnated-in-august-jobless-rate-at-9-1-.html



Refresh | +5 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-02-11 07:58 AM
Response to Original message
1. these people who don't expect the expected need to be canned.
Seriously.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
wilt the stilt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-02-11 08:03 AM
Response to Original message
2. But I thought The "job creators"
would bequeath us jobs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Lindsay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-02-11 08:08 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. I'm thinking the "job creators"
are the same people as the expecters.

Epic. Fail.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-02-11 08:12 AM
Response to Original message
4. Really? Wasn't it this month that the dow fell from over 12 to under 11?
Analysts couldn't forsee a 10% drop in the market resulting in putting on the breaks for hiring?

Damn.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
valerief Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-02-11 08:49 AM
Response to Original message
5. I guess they don't know about offshoring and employers being rewarded for it.
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
dgibby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-02-11 09:13 AM
Response to Original message
6. Unexpected?
The Tea Party set out on a suicidal mission to destroy the economy by refusing to raise the debt ceiling, our credit rating dropped, Obama continues to think that he can reason with domestic terrorists hellbent on destroying his Presidency and the country, and job stagnation was unexpected? What planet are these people living on?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
golfguru Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-02-11 02:46 PM
Response to Original message
7. Actually there was a loss of 84,000 jobs
When the "0" new jobs data came in this AM, it was adjusted with a fictious number called the "birth/death" model that purports to show the net creation of new businesses that were not surveyed in the BLS sweep.

The BLS added 84,000 hypothetical jobs to get to zero new jobs. Based on the data actually surveyed the report should have been -84000 jobs.
The birth/death model has been the subject of much suspicion by statisticians since the BLS can not show it has any historical validity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Lionessa Donating Member (842 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-02-11 06:30 PM
Response to Original message
8. It's amazing how those that are in the safe and secure top 10%
can't see what's right in front of them. Those of us in long term unemployment frustrations had no doubt, and instead doubt nearly any report showing otherwise over the past 3 years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
golfguru Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-02-11 11:17 PM
Response to Original message
9. Black unemployment highest in 27 years
http://money.cnn.com/2011/09/02/news/economy/black_unemployment_rate/index.htm?hpt=hp_t2

But the high end stores catering to rich are doing just fine. Neiman-Marcus, Bloomingdale, Tiffany, Saks 5th, Armani etc are still busy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Dec 21st 2024, 09:20 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Economy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC