Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Breaking News NYTimes **Correction** just breaking now

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Economy Donate to DU
 
Mira Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-28-11 01:14 PM
Original message
Breaking News NYTimes **Correction** just breaking now
Breaking News Alert
The New York Times
Monday, November 28, 2011 -- 1:00 PM EST
-----

Federal Judge Blocks Citigroup’s Mortgage Settlement With S.E.C.

Correction: An earlier e-mail alert misstated the size of the settlement. It was for $285 million, not $28 million.

A federal judge in New York on Monday threw out a settlement between the Securities and Exchange Commission and Citigroup over a 2007 mortgage derivatives deal, saying that the S.E.C.’s policy of settling cases by allowing a company to neither admit nor deny the agency’s allegations did not satisfy the law.
The judge, Judge Jed S. Rakoff of the Federal District Court in Manhattan, ruled that the S.E.C.’s $285 million settlement, announced last month, is “neither fair, nor adequate, nor in the public interest” because it does not provide the court with evidence on which to judge the settlement.
The ruling could throw the S.E.C.’s enforcement efforts into chaos, because a majority of the fraud and other cases that the agency brings against Wall Street firms are settled out of court, most often with a condition that the defendant does not admit that it violated the law while also promising not to deny it.

Read More:
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/11/29/business/judge-rejects-sec-accord-with-citi.html?emc=na
Refresh | +22 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
drm604 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-28-11 01:23 PM
Response to Original message
1. Even better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Historic NY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-28-11 01:34 PM
Response to Original message
2. Makes you wonder just how much $$$ was involved if they would settle for $285 million...
a trial would mostly likely yield a higher return to the public.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
eppur_se_muova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-28-11 02:04 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. ... and if the JUDGE ruled that amount "neither fair, nor adequate"! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
dixiegrrrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-28-11 01:43 PM
Response to Original message
3. nice to see the tide turning.
Perhaps it is a new morning .............
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
firehorse Donating Member (547 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-28-11 02:03 PM
Response to Original message
4. Hope this judge isn't forced into early retirement
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
toddwv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-28-11 05:07 PM
Response to Original message
6. The appeal to the SCOTUS will probably end up with the decision being vacated.
I'm thankful that there is at least one judge that isn't afraid to stand up for justice:

"Judge Rakoff also refers at one point to Citigroup as “a recidivist,” or repeat offender, which has violated the antifraud provisions of the nation’s securities laws many times. The company knew that the S.E.C.’s proposed judgment – that it cease and desist from violating the antifraud laws – had not been enforced in at least 10 years, the judge wrote."

"Investors lost $700 million in the fund, according to the S.E.C., while Citigroup gained about $160 million in profits. "


Bravo, Judge Rakoff, BRAVO!
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Dec 21st 2024, 11:17 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Economy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC