Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

OPEC Announces No Increase In Production, Citing Weakening Global Economy

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-28-08 01:25 PM
Original message
OPEC Announces No Increase In Production, Citing Weakening Global Economy
VIENNA, Austria - OPEC decided Friday against pumping more oil in a rebuff to the United States and a possible prelude to cuts as early as next month should the wounded U.S. economy sap demand for crude. The decision arrived despite U.S. urgings - backed by other major consumers - for more oil on the market to cool prices and relieve inflationary pressures that have contributed to fears of a global economic downturn.

Oil prices dropped nearly US$3 a barrel Friday after the U.S. said employers cut jobs in January, renewing worries that a possible U.S. recession that could eat into oil demand as OPEC ministers suggested.

The 13-member Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries insists that supplies were adequate and that speculators and geopolitical jitters - not oil availability - were setting prices.

OPEC said it is focused on near-term expectations: the likelihood of less demand as the Western hemisphere's heating season ends and before its summer driving season begins; the prospect of more barrels both from OPEC and non-OPEC nations, and fears that the market will shrivel if economic woes worsen. "In view of the current situation, coupled with the projected economic slowdown ... current OPEC production is sufficient to meet expected demand for the first quarter of the year," read a statement from OPEC following a meeting of its ministers.

EDIT

http://money.aol.ca/article/opec-meeting-3rd-writethru-bgt/118620/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
phantom power Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-28-08 01:27 PM
Response to Original message
1. It's interesting how the answer is always "C -- no increase"
One of these fine days, the answer is always going to be "D -- decrease production." I'm looking forward to what stories they tell about that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-28-08 01:28 PM
Response to Original message
2. no surprise-$5/gal by years end
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sinkingfeeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-28-08 03:14 PM
Response to Original message
3. So even when George asked nicely, they turn him down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Nov 03rd 2024, 07:35 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC