Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

AlterNet: Democrats Are Blowing Our Best Chance for Clean Energy

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
OKIsItJustMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-30-08 02:04 PM
Original message
AlterNet: Democrats Are Blowing Our Best Chance for Clean Energy
http://www.alternet.org/environment/89700/?ses=fbb432acf8cbef7084d3763427856abc

Democrats Are Blowing Our Best Chance for Clean Energy

By Kelpie Wilson, AlterNet. Posted June 30, 2008.

How the Dems sacked one of the most important opportunities to turn around our energy future.

Take some of Big Oil's obscene profits and invest the money in developing clean renewable energy for the future. This is the Democrats' big idea on energy and it's a good one, but right now Democrats are botching it badly.

On June 18th, Congress failed for the tenth time this year to pass an extension of the renewable energy tax credits that have nurtured the infant wind and solar power industries in the US but are set to expire at the end of 2008. The tax credit extension should have been included in the big renewable energy bill that Congress passed at the end of 2007, but Republicans blocked the provision because they didn't like closing oil tax loopholes to pay for it.

Some Democrats, like Washington Senator Maria Cantwell, got it, and shifted the approach. Cantwell drafted a bipartisan bill, cosponsored by Nevada Republican John Ensign, to renew the tax credits without requiring a budget offset that would draw a Republican filibuster or a Bush veto.

The problem is that a contingent of House Democrats has continued to insist that no renewable energy tax credit extension be passed unless it can be paid for by cutting some other budget item or by adding revenue -- like increasing taxes on Big Oil. These "pay-go" rules are supposed to establish Democrats as the anti-deficit party and the House leadership has been unmovable on the principle when it applies to renewable energy.

...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
electropop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-30-08 02:22 PM
Response to Original message
1. We will all burn in a hell of our own making.
Great going, Dems. Cave in again on an obvious winner issue. You will pay for this in the fall.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
diane in sf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-30-08 08:32 PM
Response to Original message
2. Is it bribes from corporations or blackmail from Bushco's FISA activities?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNadir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-30-08 08:58 PM
Response to Original message
3. Let's bash Democrats for failing to subsidize the rich in ways that the rich want to be subsidized.
In fact, the money spent on so called "renewable energy" is largely wasted.

I hear all the time complaints from people who wouldn't know the best chance for safe energy if it bit them in the ass how nuclear energy is "subsidized" and therefore worthless.

In fact, nuclear energy - which is hardly subsidized enough given its huge merits - is and has been for more than thirty years the world's largest, by far, form of climate change gas free primary energy.

In fact, so called "renewable energy" industry - which is the subject of more than six years of "affordable" propaganda here, all of it coming from yuppie brats - would collapse in 2 hours without massive subsidies, most of which are targeted at the people who need them the least.

As ususal, all that we have here is the usual selective attention.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bhikkhu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-01-08 12:04 AM
Response to Original message
4. Its hard to see the " most important opportunity" there
The first idea that the oil companies should be punished for having big profits is pretty shaky, and kind of like the junky robbing his dealer. Long-term, there will be problems.

The notion that we need to take from the oil companies and give to the "renewables" (whoever they are) also seems a bit stalinist and questionable. Are there concrete gains and projections of concrete benefits to be had? I am all for "nurturing the infant wind and solar power industries", but I think that there are good ways and bad ways. All the bad ways have already been done, resulting in part in the measly pittance of renewable power in the grid currently. Simply passing money around the top tier and making up dramas to justify who gets rich next has not been serving the purpose.

The energy tax credit needs to be reworked from the ground up looking at what will be the most effective and efficient approach, and leaving punitive sideshows out of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Howzit Donating Member (918 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-01-08 01:23 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. I like the way you think and express yourself.
Clear, reasoned and without any dramatics or insults.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Howzit Donating Member (918 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-01-08 01:20 AM
Response to Original message
5. "The problem is that a contingent of House Democrats has continued to insist..."
"...that no renewable energy tax credit extension be passed unless it can be paid for by cutting some other budget item or by adding revenue..."

You could always print more money if you don't believe in fiscal responsibility.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Oct 18th 2024, 01:16 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC