Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

BLM Employee - If Gas/Oil/ORV Industries Don't Want It, We Can Protect It

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-28-04 09:14 AM
Original message
BLM Employee - If Gas/Oil/ORV Industries Don't Want It, We Can Protect It
Secretary of the Interior Gale A. Norton insists the Bush administration is committed to protecting the nation's wild lands, but the words of a Bureau of Land Management worker in Price, Utah, tell the real story. "We can protect any landscape that no one wants to use for anything else," Tom Gnojek told The Times' Henry Weinstein. "If it's not wanted by the oil and gas industry or the ORV (off-road vehicle) industry, we can protect it." The administration is giving industry virtual carte blanche to look for oil and gas wherever it wants outside of existing parks and wilderness areas.

Weinstein's story, in Monday's Times, tells of how the Bush administration turned wilderness protection on its head in Utah. The nation's previous policy had been to protect 2.6 million acres of prospective wilderness in Utah until Congress could decide whether to grant formal protection under the Wilderness Act of 1964 or release the land for other use. Currently, the Bureau of Land Management is roaring ahead to allow oil and gas exploration and drilling in the proposed Red Rock Wilderness area; the issue is pending in Congress. Three lease sales already have been conducted, one of them just last month, despite court challenges.

EDIT

Utah is a politically conservative state in which the dominant interests have long opposed the idea of wilderness. Among Western states, only Hawaii has less wilderness. Jerry McNelly, a county commissioner in Moab, says of potential wilderness, "We need it for economic development." That ignores the fact that Moab, the entry point to Arches and Canyonlands national parks, is booming with business from tourists and outdoor recreationists and adventurers. It also blinks at the long history of boom-and-bust energy projects that blighted many areas in the West and left them without steady tax revenue for schools, police and alternative economic development."

EDIT

http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/editorials/la-ed-wild27oct27,1,7292082.story?coll=la-news-comment-editorials
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC