|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy |
![]() |
madokie
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 06:52 AM Original message |
I would request that the pro-nuke people on here to read this post from GD |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NMDemDist2
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 06:58 AM Response to Original message |
1. broken link n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madokie
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 07:07 AM Response to Reply #1 |
2. Fixed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DCKit
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 07:21 AM Response to Original message |
3. Exajoules!!! Exajoules!!! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ladjf
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 07:38 AM Response to Reply #3 |
4. Sounds like Captain Exajoules. His posts = Subject + verb + exajoules. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madokie
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 07:42 AM Response to Reply #4 |
5. Personally I think it wrong for this person to talk to us as he does |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrMonk
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 07:42 AM Response to Original message |
6. Needs more explanation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madokie
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 07:58 AM Response to Reply #6 |
7. it has everything to do with the lie that is, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrMonk
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 08:10 AM Response to Reply #7 |
9. Radiation and metals exposure at nuclear power plants? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jpak
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 09:35 AM Response to Reply #9 |
17. The US civilian and military nuclear infrastructure are one in the same |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cosmik debris
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 10:13 AM Response to Reply #17 |
21. Interesting numbers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madokie
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 10:28 AM Response to Reply #21 |
24. see post 16 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cosmik debris
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 10:54 AM Response to Reply #24 |
33. So, let me see if I have this right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madokie
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 11:23 AM Response to Reply #33 |
41. Yep, you got it all figured out don't you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cosmik debris
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 11:32 AM Response to Reply #41 |
43. I'm just trying to get a coherent argument |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madokie
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 11:35 AM Response to Reply #43 |
45. my o my |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cosmik debris
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 11:50 AM Response to Reply #45 |
47. The anti-nuclear power movement needs better spokespersons. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madokie
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 12:02 PM Response to Reply #47 |
50. I had no intentions to even try |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kristopher
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 02:16 PM Response to Reply #47 |
54. There is no "anti-nuclear" movement. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madokie
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 02:22 PM Response to Reply #54 |
55. Thanks Kristopher |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cosmik debris
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 02:24 PM Response to Reply #54 |
57. . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kristopher
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 02:32 PM Response to Reply #57 |
60. And that proves what? Movement is the operative word. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cosmik debris
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 02:45 PM Response to Reply #60 |
64. But in your other post "anti-nuclear" was the operative word. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kristopher
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 02:52 PM Response to Reply #64 |
66. I've noticed you have a lot of trouble with Basic English and logic. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 02:58 PM Response to Reply #66 |
67. Deleted sub-thread |
jpak
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 02:38 PM Response to Reply #47 |
63. The pro-nuclear movement has a "better spokepersons" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jpak
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 10:40 AM Response to Reply #21 |
29. The same uranium mines that produced U for bombs produced U for power reactors |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cosmik debris
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 10:51 AM Response to Reply #29 |
31. I understand all that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madokie
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 11:00 AM Response to Reply #31 |
35. I'm interested in that too and it would be a good subject to maybe explore if one is so inclined |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cosmik debris
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 11:07 AM Response to Reply #35 |
36. Then this should interest you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madokie
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 11:18 AM Response to Reply #36 |
38. as if I would want any of what hes selling |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cosmik debris
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 11:20 AM Response to Reply #38 |
40. Just comparing coal mining to uranium mining |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madokie
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 11:25 AM Response to Reply #40 |
42. its the messenger not the message |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cosmik debris
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 11:33 AM Response to Reply #42 |
44. Do you have knowledge of this person's incredulity? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madokie
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 11:46 AM Response to Reply #44 |
46. Start a new thread and lets discuss that there, ok |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cosmik debris
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 12:00 PM Response to Reply #46 |
49. I'm just trying understand the support for your position. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madokie
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 12:08 PM Response to Reply #49 |
51. thats making a lot of sense |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cosmik debris
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 11:19 AM Response to Reply #35 |
39. Here is another from Scientific American |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GliderGuider
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 08:10 AM Response to Reply #6 |
8. Well, on the one hand you nave "nuclear armaments", on the other you have "nuclear power" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madokie
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 08:27 AM Response to Reply #8 |
11. What I'm saying is if the truth as it is was widely known then we would never have opened this genie |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Brotherjohn
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 10:12 AM Response to Reply #11 |
20. You do realize it is not just CO2 we are dealing with today? It is NOx, SO2, Hg, etc. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madokie
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 11:57 AM Response to Reply #20 |
48. Yes I do and I also understand we're talking about a very dangerous |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Brotherjohn
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 01:08 PM Response to Reply #48 |
52. Of course, nuclear is dangerous. My point was that, today, fossil fuels are moreso. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madokie
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 01:30 PM Response to Reply #52 |
53. well not really because there is no way to ramp up nuclear energy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Brotherjohn
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 02:25 PM Response to Reply #53 |
58. This will be my last post (you may have the last word). ANY power plant, wind included, takes years |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madokie
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 02:34 PM Response to Reply #58 |
61. For the most part I see us in the same boat with the same cross to bear |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kristopher
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 02:36 PM Response to Reply #58 |
62. Do you think Gore is an idiot or a liar? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Brotherjohn
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 02:59 PM Response to Reply #62 |
68. See my post below. I think he's neither. I think he's a genius, and a forward thinker. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kristopher
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 03:02 PM Response to Reply #68 |
70. OK. That is an area of common understanding. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nederland
![]() |
Tue Jul-22-08 02:30 PM Response to Reply #62 |
92. I think Gore is a politician |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
diane in sf
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 03:15 PM Response to Reply #58 |
71. Ramping up wind plants is much faster than nuke plants. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kristopher
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 02:23 PM Response to Reply #52 |
56. So you are calling Gore a liar? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Brotherjohn
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 02:50 PM Response to Reply #56 |
65. Of course not, silly. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kristopher
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 02:59 PM Response to Reply #65 |
69. 2X You stated flat out there are ONLY 2 options - nuclear or fossil |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Brotherjohn
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 03:17 PM Response to Reply #69 |
72. At the fore I will say I haven't read Gore's entire speech. I never got into this discussion... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madokie
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 03:46 PM Response to Reply #72 |
75. I think Brotherjohn that we have a poisoned pen here in the EE forum |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Brotherjohn
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 04:08 PM Response to Reply #75 |
79. I take back my pledge to give you the last word (in our immediate discussion that is). |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madokie
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 04:25 PM Response to Reply #79 |
80. These discussions always do seem to get contentious for some reason |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kristopher
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 06:02 PM Response to Reply #72 |
81. The part about Gore was to add drama to the point, nothing more. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kristopher
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 02:31 PM Response to Reply #48 |
59. You have it right. They are arguing falsely by creating a false choice. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Brotherjohn
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 03:29 PM Response to Reply #59 |
73. I never said those were the ONLY choices; I in fact argued for pursuing ALL choices. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cosmik debris
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 08:19 AM Response to Original message |
10. Please help me understand |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madokie
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 08:29 AM Response to Reply #10 |
12. its about the lie that is safe nuclear anything |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cosmik debris
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 08:43 AM Response to Reply #12 |
13. safe nuclear anything? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madokie
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 09:07 AM Response to Reply #13 |
14. as I was saying up post |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cosmik debris
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 09:19 AM Response to Reply #14 |
15. If you had a point, you failed to make it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madokie
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 09:26 AM Response to Reply #15 |
16. I was not making a comparison nor am I now |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cosmik debris
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 09:48 AM Response to Reply #16 |
18. I don't need to discredit what you posted |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madokie
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 10:00 AM Response to Reply #18 |
19. So you think that I should be a 'what' to be against nuclear energy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cosmik debris
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 10:26 AM Response to Reply #19 |
23. I'm not trying to "put a stop to discussion", quite the opposite. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madokie
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 10:36 AM Response to Reply #23 |
25. OK whatever |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SidDithers
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 10:21 AM Response to Original message |
22. This post makes no sense...nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cosmik debris
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 10:36 AM Response to Reply #22 |
26. It doesn't need to. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madokie
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 10:39 AM Response to Reply #26 |
28. as I was saying earlier |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madokie
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 10:37 AM Response to Reply #22 |
27. I suppose that could be true for you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SidDithers
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 10:43 AM Response to Reply #27 |
30. I guess I don't see how US govt. mistreatment of nuclear arms workers... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madokie
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 10:52 AM Response to Reply #30 |
32. Well Sid I don't know what to tell you then |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NNadir
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 10:56 AM Response to Original message |
34. You seem to think your selective attention and views of crap in isolation are impressive. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madokie
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 11:10 AM Response to Reply #34 |
37. and you think I don't know that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Javaman
![]() |
Tue Jul-22-08 11:23 AM Response to Reply #34 |
91. Man, you are like a habitual gambler. You just don't know when to quit. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
depakid
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 03:35 PM Response to Original message |
74. The simple fact is that Americans have a choice: burn filthy coal or build more nuclear power plant |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madokie
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 03:49 PM Response to Reply #74 |
76. The whole deal with the grid is we are right next door to each other |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
depakid
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 03:55 PM Response to Reply #76 |
77. Transmission loss can be substantial over distance |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madokie
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 04:00 PM Response to Reply #77 |
78. transmissions losses are huge no doubt but its something that can be dealt with |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kristopher
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 06:14 PM Response to Reply #78 |
82. They are also marketing "superconducting" transmission lines. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
depakid
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 07:35 PM Response to Reply #82 |
83. When you can show me an economically viable scaled up system, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kristopher
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 10:42 PM Response to Reply #83 |
84. By your logic we would still be in trees. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
depakid
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 11:25 PM Response to Reply #84 |
85. Living in the reality based community requires making choices |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kristopher
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 11:37 PM Response to Reply #85 |
86. By your logic we would still be in trees. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
depakid
![]() |
Mon Jul-21-08 11:56 PM Response to Reply #86 |
87. Not interested in continuing to play sophomoric games |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kristopher
![]() |
Tue Jul-22-08 12:11 AM Response to Reply #87 |
88. That's your standard answer when you've backed yourself into a corner.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nihil
![]() |
Tue Jul-22-08 05:53 AM Response to Original message |
89. Read it. Not impressed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madokie
![]() |
Tue Jul-22-08 08:28 AM Response to Reply #89 |
90. I'm not surprised at your |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nihil
![]() |
Wed Jul-23-08 06:49 AM Response to Reply #90 |
99. "I am going to play by my rules" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wtmusic
![]() |
Tue Jul-22-08 04:13 PM Response to Original message |
93. Yes, radiation can be dangerous |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madokie
![]() |
Tue Jul-22-08 04:48 PM Response to Reply #93 |
94. Now ain't you a fine one to be calling the kettle black |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wtmusic
![]() |
Tue Jul-22-08 06:30 PM Response to Reply #94 |
95. Hehe |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madokie
![]() |
Tue Jul-22-08 10:03 PM Response to Reply #95 |
96. how can you set there and type that tripe |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wtmusic
![]() |
Tue Jul-22-08 11:52 PM Response to Reply #96 |
97. You should read what you just wrote |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kristopher
![]() |
Wed Jul-23-08 12:41 AM Response to Reply #97 |
98. There's that false choice again... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nihil
![]() |
Wed Jul-23-08 07:04 AM Response to Reply #98 |
101. Not a false choice at all ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kristopher
![]() |
Wed Jul-23-08 11:06 AM Response to Reply #101 |
102. False choice for certain and sure. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nihil
![]() |
Wed Jul-23-08 12:32 PM Response to Reply #102 |
104. Fine. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kristopher
![]() |
Wed Jul-23-08 01:59 PM Response to Reply #104 |
105. You are speaking to Gore and virtually every prominent energy analysts out there. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GliderGuider
![]() |
Wed Jul-23-08 02:07 PM Response to Reply #105 |
106. Yes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kristopher
![]() |
Wed Jul-23-08 02:10 PM Response to Reply #106 |
107. Full replaceement of fossil fuels in 10 years says you have a flawed understanding |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GliderGuider
![]() |
Wed Jul-23-08 02:16 PM Response to Reply #107 |
108. Full replacement of fossil fuels in 10 years says I want some of what he's smoking. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kristopher
![]() |
Wed Jul-23-08 02:24 PM Response to Reply #108 |
109. All your reply says is that you are too lazy to sit down and do a few simple calculations. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GliderGuider
![]() |
Wed Jul-23-08 02:28 PM Response to Reply #109 |
110. I have no doubt it's technically possible. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kristopher
![]() |
Wed Jul-23-08 02:32 PM Response to Reply #110 |
111. So you have no idea of the technical challenge, yet you go around pooh pooh |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nihil
![]() |
Wed Jul-23-08 06:57 AM Response to Reply #96 |
100. Speaking of talking tripe ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kristopher
![]() |
Wed Jul-23-08 11:17 AM Response to Reply #100 |
103. Remove things from context much??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Sep 07th 2024, 08:02 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC