|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy |
![]() |
OKIsItJustMe
![]() |
Tue Jul-22-08 11:58 PM Original message |
EERC director: Hydrogen vehicles nearly available for commercial use |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wtmusic
![]() |
Wed Jul-23-08 12:07 AM Response to Original message |
1. "It's the fuel of today, or 4-5 years from today, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OKIsItJustMe
![]() |
Wed Jul-23-08 12:13 AM Response to Reply #1 |
2. OK, so let's see if I've got this straight |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wtmusic
![]() |
Wed Jul-23-08 06:54 AM Response to Reply #2 |
9. I trust that you'll always present the GM corporate line |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OKIsItJustMe
![]() |
Wed Jul-23-08 01:25 PM Response to Reply #9 |
14. Or is it the Toyota line? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OKIsItJustMe
![]() |
Wed Jul-23-08 01:30 PM Response to Reply #14 |
15. No, now I remember, I'm in Honda's pocket |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wtmusic
![]() |
Wed Jul-23-08 03:28 PM Response to Reply #15 |
18. Hyundai too? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Speck Tater
![]() |
Wed Jul-23-08 12:22 AM Response to Original message |
3. Once more with feeling... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Robert Oak
![]() |
Wed Jul-23-08 12:36 AM Response to Reply #3 |
4. nice call out |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Howzit
![]() |
Wed Jul-23-08 01:19 AM Response to Reply #3 |
6. And hydrogen is incredibly difficult to contain due to the small molecules that like to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Trillo
![]() |
Wed Jul-23-08 01:30 AM Response to Reply #3 |
7. perhaps it's currently inefficient, but there apparently are hydrogen solar cells. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kristopher
![]() |
Wed Jul-23-08 03:52 AM Response to Reply #7 |
8. The this is the same inefficiency as noted above. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Trillo
![]() |
Wed Jul-23-08 11:55 AM Response to Reply #8 |
12. Batteries generally have a toxic nature. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kristopher
![]() |
Wed Jul-23-08 02:07 PM Response to Reply #12 |
16. You are seriously out of date about batteries. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Trillo
![]() |
Wed Jul-23-08 03:15 PM Response to Reply #16 |
17. You mean like this Battery Toxicity info |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kristopher
![]() |
Wed Jul-23-08 04:01 PM Response to Reply #17 |
19. H has 75% system losses, that is too much |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Trillo
![]() |
Wed Jul-23-08 06:24 PM Response to Reply #19 |
20. While the hybrid battery toxicity site says that lithium is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lfairban
![]() |
Fri Jul-25-08 08:23 PM Response to Reply #20 |
57. I got an idea. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kristopher
![]() |
Fri Jul-25-08 08:40 PM Response to Reply #57 |
59. Cute... nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wtmusic
![]() |
Wed Jul-23-08 07:01 AM Response to Reply #3 |
10. And oil companies are supposed to profit from your scheme...how? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Indenturedebtor
![]() |
Wed Jul-23-08 11:58 AM Response to Reply #3 |
13. ZING and hydrogen is shot down again. It's a raquet folks |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Strelnikov_
![]() |
Wed Jul-23-08 11:37 PM Response to Reply #3 |
22. .. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Trillo
![]() |
Thu Jul-24-08 08:51 PM Response to Reply #22 |
33. You have grouped them oddly. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Strelnikov_
![]() |
Fri Jul-25-08 08:42 AM Response to Reply #33 |
49. "shows a bias" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ElectricGrid
![]() |
Fri Jul-25-08 10:31 AM Response to Reply #3 |
51. Please get over it.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NickB79
![]() |
Fri Jul-25-08 03:23 PM Response to Reply #51 |
55. With 75% system loss of energy in hydrogen systems, you still come out behind though |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IntravenousDemilo
![]() |
Wed Jul-23-08 12:55 AM Response to Original message |
5. Geh!!! Fossil fuels are expended during the manufacture of hydrogen cells. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DCKit
![]() |
Wed Jul-23-08 07:51 AM Response to Original message |
11. Exajoules! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bhikkhu
![]() |
Wed Jul-23-08 08:57 PM Response to Original message |
21. Reading of California's plan, it sounds good |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
monomach
![]() |
Thu Jul-24-08 12:13 AM Response to Original message |
23. "nearly available for commercial use" BY MULTI-MILLIONAIRES |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Trillo
![]() |
Thu Jul-24-08 12:28 PM Response to Reply #23 |
24. You forgot to mention "Big Battery" nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kristopher
![]() |
Thu Jul-24-08 01:55 PM Response to Reply #24 |
25. What a kidder... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Trillo
![]() |
Thu Jul-24-08 02:27 PM Response to Reply #25 |
26. I didn't say '"Big Battery" is coming', learn to read slower. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kristopher
![]() |
Thu Jul-24-08 02:53 PM Response to Reply #26 |
27. Riiiiiiiiiight.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Trillo
![]() |
Thu Jul-24-08 03:04 PM Response to Reply #27 |
28. Even solar cells are now part of "Big Energy" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kristopher
![]() |
Thu Jul-24-08 03:17 PM Response to Reply #28 |
30. It requires a corresponding shift in infrastructure. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Trillo
![]() |
Thu Jul-24-08 08:38 PM Response to Reply #30 |
32. That doesn't make a whole lot of sense, unless you're in the Free Market camp |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kristopher
![]() |
Thu Jul-24-08 11:36 PM Response to Reply #32 |
34. You aren't taking the total picture into account. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Trillo
![]() |
Thu Jul-24-08 11:53 PM Response to Reply #34 |
35. Which takes us back round turn to "Big Battery" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kristopher
![]() |
Fri Jul-25-08 12:11 AM Response to Reply #35 |
37. WTF are you talking about? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Trillo
![]() |
Fri Jul-25-08 12:22 AM Response to Reply #37 |
39. Which corporation are you advocating for? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kristopher
![]() |
Fri Jul-25-08 12:29 AM Response to Reply #39 |
40. And that chart is supposed to show what? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Trillo
![]() |
Fri Jul-25-08 12:32 AM Response to Reply #40 |
41. It appears the electric distribution grid has losses FAR in excess of 10%. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kristopher
![]() |
Fri Jul-25-08 12:44 AM Response to Reply #41 |
42. You are wrong |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Trillo
![]() |
Fri Jul-25-08 01:01 AM Response to Reply #42 |
43. So you believe that accusing me of being drunk is "correct"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kristopher
![]() |
Fri Jul-25-08 02:34 AM Response to Reply #43 |
44. I'm still waiting for a specific citation supporting your claims. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Trillo
![]() |
Fri Jul-25-08 02:45 AM Response to Reply #44 |
45. You have provided no citations for your likely false assertions, otherwise known as lies. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kristopher
![]() |
Fri Jul-25-08 02:48 AM Response to Reply #45 |
46. Poor feller.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Trillo
![]() |
Fri Jul-25-08 03:20 AM Response to Reply #46 |
47. Oops, self-delete. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Trillo
![]() |
Fri Jul-25-08 03:48 AM Response to Reply #46 |
48. So you're claiming an excerpt of others work, cited no less, as my assertion? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nederland
![]() |
Thu Jul-24-08 03:04 PM Response to Reply #24 |
29. Exactly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kristopher
![]() |
Thu Jul-24-08 03:19 PM Response to Reply #29 |
31. see #30. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nederland
![]() |
Fri Jul-25-08 12:09 AM Response to Reply #31 |
36. #30 explained nothing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kristopher
![]() |
Fri Jul-25-08 12:14 AM Response to Reply #36 |
38. You really don't care about facts, do you? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nederland
![]() |
Fri Jul-25-08 10:26 AM Response to Reply #38 |
50. Then please enlighten me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kristopher
![]() |
Fri Jul-25-08 12:12 PM Response to Reply #50 |
52. See post #30. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nederland
![]() |
Fri Jul-25-08 03:00 PM Response to Reply #52 |
54. Semantics |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kristopher
![]() |
Fri Jul-25-08 08:39 PM Response to Reply #54 |
58. You are being absurd |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nederland
![]() |
Fri Jul-25-08 11:10 PM Response to Reply #58 |
61. Good idea |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kristopher
![]() |
Sat Jul-26-08 03:49 PM Response to Reply #61 |
63. Like shooting fish in a barrel... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nederland
![]() |
Tue Jul-29-08 10:29 AM Response to Reply #63 |
67. Response |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kristopher
![]() |
Mon Jul-28-08 04:20 PM Response to Reply #61 |
64. What, no response? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kristopher
![]() |
Tue Jul-29-08 02:34 AM Response to Reply #61 |
65. ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NNadir
![]() |
Fri Jul-25-08 01:09 PM Response to Original message |
53. That's what Amory Lovins said in 2001 about 2005. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madokie
![]() |
Fri Jul-25-08 06:41 PM Response to Reply #53 |
56. Why the big hard-on for Lovins anyway there big guy? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NNadir
![]() |
Fri Jul-25-08 09:48 PM Response to Reply #56 |
60. Why don't you stick to telling us about your solar swimming pool light? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madokie
![]() |
Sat Jul-26-08 08:24 AM Response to Reply #60 |
62. For your info I am a mixed race American. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kristopher
![]() |
Tue Jul-29-08 02:50 AM Response to Reply #62 |
66. Follow to original pdf to see "why" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Sep 07th 2024, 08:31 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC