Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Farmers may pay a stiff price for contributions to global warming.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 08:47 AM
Original message
Farmers may pay a stiff price for contributions to global warming.
http://www.tucsoncitizen.com/ss/fromcomments/103878.php

Farmers are being warned they could pay a stiff price for their contributions to global warming.

That could happen if the Environmental Protection Agency goes forward with regulating greenhouse gas emissions under the federal Clean Air Act, according to the U.S. Agriculture Department.

Under the law, livestock operations of all sizes and farms with as few as 500 acres of corn could exceed emissions thresholds and would be required to pay for permits, USDA says.

These fees could amount to as much as $20 for every hog and $175 per dairy cow, says Rick Krause, who follows climate policy for the American Farm Bureau Federation.

<more>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BeFree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 08:52 AM
Response to Original message
1. Permits?
You mean they will make you pay when you cause pollution? And only after you pay, will they permit you to pollute?

Permits to pollute? Permit you to pollute but only after you pay? No pay, no pollute? WTF?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stuntcat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 09:23 AM
Response to Original message
2. We should just pay extra, when it's meat
People who eat meat 4 times a day don't realize the real cost of getting it to their mouths. And I'm not saying everyone has to go vegetarian but our meat industry does more harm than any other and it's govt. subsidized. The price in the end doesn't have much to do with all it's taken to produce it.
We're used to consumption being cheap though.. having the short memories and all! :P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hendo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 11:17 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. but if its not subsidized
they might not be able to keep up with the price of foriegn meat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 07:37 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC