Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Merrill Lynch - Non-OPEC Oil Production Possibly Peaked - "Steeper Output Declines Going Forward"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-09 01:42 PM
Original message
Merrill Lynch - Non-OPEC Oil Production Possibly Peaked - "Steeper Output Declines Going Forward"
Merrill Lynch on Tuesday said that crude oil production from non-OPEC nations may have already peaked, nothing that oil production decline rates were a function of investment rates, as well as the size and age of oil fields. 'All these factors point to steeper oil output declines going forward,' the firm wrote.

EDIT

'Should the credit crunch push decline rates to 6 percent, however, non-OPEC production could decline precipitously toward million barrels per day by 2015 from the current levels,' it wrote.

EDIT

http://www.forbes.com/feeds/afx/2009/02/03/afx6002345.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-09 01:44 PM
Response to Original message
1. Sounds like a desperate call by an outfit still stuck in oil futures
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-09 02:53 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. BINGO! They want to give back all that TARP money so they can keep their bonuses,
so they've got to get those oil prices back up again!

EVIL ASSHOLES!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Idealism Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-09 01:48 PM
Response to Original message
2. Certain firms have been trying to scare us into thinking Russia has peaked for years
Some investment houses are stuck in the oil commodity past instead of the green future
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NickB79 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-09 02:38 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Uh, the fact that Russian oil output DECLINED is what's scaring us to think they've peaked
http://uk.biz.yahoo.com/03012009/325/russia-oil-output-falls-first-time-decade.html

And it declined during a period in time when oil was at $100+/barrel :wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Idealism Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-09 03:22 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. The last quarter and a half
oil was not at 100 dollars per barrel.

Russia cut back production because of falling oil prices, as OPEC did numerous times. Russia is not a member of OPEC, and tries to set their prices accordingly.

This article states their output dropped 1%, which is a paltry amount to be sure, and something they could have easily done (and should have) the last quarter of the year to try to halt the falling prices.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NickB79 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 01:19 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. Their decline began before the price peak in July
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GliderGuider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-09 03:30 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. What about that pesky North Sea problem?
And the United States of America? And Mexico and Venezuela? And a host of smaller producers around the world?

Pointing to Russia does nothing to derogate the probability of an aggregate non-OPEC production peak.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Idealism Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-09 03:37 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. I fear the data these so called analysts are using
is based off of production cuts due to the downturn of commodity prices. The non-OPEC countries don't have targeted production cuts decided at central meetings scheduled once a month like OPEC does, so they may haphazardly drop production in the face of slowing global demand.

Also, these people have vested interests in drumming up fear over oil being scarce, as Merrill-Lynch in particular has invested heavily in storage of oil in hopes of profiting on the futures market by taking delivery themselves and in actual reserves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GliderGuider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-09 05:43 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Oil production in the USA has been declining since 1970
Production in Mexico has been declining since 2004, in Norway since 2001, in the UK since 1999, in Venezuela since 1998 (all data taken from The BP Statistical Review of World Energy 2008 -- XLS).

Regardless of what's been happening to international oil prices in the last six months, these trends are well established, and were evident before the price peak. Peak Oil is a real phenomenon, I'm afraid.

Russia's production has been extremely variable over the past 20+ years, but that has more to do with their internal economic and political situation than the physical state of their oil fields. Russia appears to be holding their own compared to the other major non-OPEC producers, but it's reasonable to think that without the decade-long production slump they experienced from 1992 to 2002 their picture would be much different today. Those ten years left about 50 million barrels, or 5 years' production, in the ground.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
corruptmewithpower Donating Member (411 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-04-09 01:54 PM
Response to Original message
3. That will bring about a brighter future sooner.
I envision myself commuting in an electric golf cart juiced up via wind, solar, geothermal, tidal, and nuclear powerplants.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 09:39 PM
Response to Reply #3
11. Optimistic that...
I'm envisioning commuting with shoes. With climate change and increasing human populations a most excellent outcome will be having a place to live and something to eat.

I wish people would stop talking about tidal power as if it's a benign thing. Of all your energy proposals it is by far the most environmentally destructive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 01:46 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC