Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

How to Use Solar Energy at Night

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
kristopher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-09 07:07 PM
Original message
How to Use Solar Energy at Night
Near Granada, Spain, more than 28,000 metric tons of salt is now coursing through pipes at the Andasol 1 power plant. That salt will be used to solve a pressing if obvious problem for solar power: What do you do when the sun is not shining and at night?

The answer: store sunlight as heat energy for such a rainy day.

Part of a so-called parabolic trough solar-thermal power plant, the salts will soon help the facility light up the night—literally. Because most salts only melt at high temperatures (table salt, for example, melts at around 1472 degrees Fahrenheit, or 800 degrees Celsius) and do not turn to vapor until they get considerably hotter—they can be used to store a lot of the sun's energy as heat. Simply use the sunlight to heat up the salts and put those molten salts in proximity to water via a heat exchanger. Hot steam can then be made to turn turbines without losing too much of the original absorbed solar energy.

The salts—a mixture of sodium and potassium nitrate, otherwise used as fertilizers—allow enough of the sun's heat to be stored that the power plant can pump out electricity for nearly eight hours after the sun starts to set. "It's enough for 7.5 hours to produce energy with full capacity of 50 megawatts," says Sven Moormann, a spokesman for Solar Millennium, AG, the German solar company that developed the Andasol plant. "The hours of production are nearly double power plant without storage and we have the possibility to plan our electricity production."

Using ...
http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?id=how-to-use-solar-energy-at-night
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Nederland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-09 07:15 PM
Response to Original message
1. How much does it cost?
Specifically, how much does it add to the cost of a building a 100 MW plant?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kristopher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-09 07:23 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Perhaps you missed it when you read the article, but it's there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nederland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-09 11:28 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Yeah, I'm lazy
"$50 per kilowatt-hour to install"

And that doesn't even include the cost of 2000 acres of land.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pleah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-18-09 07:18 PM
Response to Original message
2. K&R Wow. That is very interesting!
I am going to read more about this. Thanks.

I wonder if, at least, the East and West coasts could put this to use.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OKIsItJustMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-09 12:18 AM
Response to Original message
5. Actually, the DoE facility "Solar Two" used this technology in the 1990's
Edited on Thu Feb-19-09 12:33 AM by OKIsItJustMe
http://www.energylan.sandia.gov/sunlab/Snapshot/STFUTURE.HTM


Solar Two represents a new generation of solar energy technology, capable of producing clean, cost-effective, dispatchable electric power on a very large scale, without harmful pollutants or carbon emissions. Solar Two was conceived and built on the site of its predecessor, Solar One, by a consortium of U.S. utilities and industry and the Department of Energy (DOE). Over its three years of operation, Solar Two achieved its overall goal of demonstrating advanced molten-salt power tower technology developed over the past decade at a scale sufficient to allow follow-on commercialization of the technology. Plant operations successfully proved that solar energy could be collected efficiently over a broad range of operating conditions and that the low-cost energy storage system operated reliably and efficiently. This unique storage capability allowed solar energy to be collected when the sun was shining and high-value, dispatchable electric power to be generated at night or whenever demanded by the utility, even when the sun was not shining.



(More information):
http://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy01osti/28751.pdf
http://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy99osti/24643.pdf
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Solar_Project#Solar_Two
http://www1.eere.energy.gov/solar/thermal_storage.html

The Spanish plant uses the technology pioneered in the US by Solar Two.

For information on a US company that's planning to use the technology, check out SolarReserve:
http://www.solar-reserve.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNadir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-09 03:04 AM
Response to Original message
6. The moron Amory Lovins called this bone headed idea "just around the corner" in 1976.
That's just what we need.

A brazillion dumb millions of tons of salt sitting over a brazillion solar plants with low energy density over the world's water supplies.

Now mind you, I support molten salt nuclear reactors, but the energy density of a nuclear reactor is millions of times higher, the economics a million times better, and therefore the maintainence a million times easier.

In general, every "renewables will save us" idea is sort of like the old joke where the space program of a purported dumb country proposes a mission to the sun, preventing the heat problem by going at night.

Since there are ZERO "renewables will save us" advocates who have even passing acquaintance with the laws of thermodynamics, they all seem to have (predictably) ignored that any energy storage plan has huge external costs.

But it is also generally true that renewables will save us advocates couldn't care less about risk for their stupid little "save our cars" schemes. There are ZERO "renewbles will save us" advocates who give a rat's ass about the more than 200,000 people who died at the Banqiao dam failures in 1976, but just about everyone them has a fetish about the less than 50 who died in 1986 at Chernobyl.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sirveri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-09 06:58 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Do you show up just to bash everything that isn't nuclear?
I mean seriously now. Parabolic mirrors and steam piping feed a steam turbine and also dump heat into a heat battery for later use at night. This is a good thing. Nuclear is nice, but that too will run out in time, we'll need everything we can get in the future once nat gas gets really expensive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
druidity33 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-09 08:12 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. yes.
he does.

:shrug:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HamdenRice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-09 08:30 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. He is DU's most one trick of all one trick ponies
That is literally all he does. The only thing missing is he didn't say, "I note with contempt..." his one trick pony catch phrase.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-09 09:58 AM
Response to Reply #6
11. From your perspective "moron" is high praise indeed. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-09 10:27 AM
Response to Reply #6
13. The charlatan New Jersey molten salt breeder reactor is a sick delusional fraud
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
formercia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-09 07:37 AM
Response to Original message
8. There are low temperature solutions to the problem
Utilizing the heat of crystallization and heat of hydration of some soluble salts in water, heat can be stored and extracted in a manner that creates, in effect a thermal 'battery.' Sodium and Potassium Nitrate are very corrosive and can create a fire hazard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCKit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-09 10:27 AM
Response to Reply #8
12. Gasoline is highly dangerous too, but everyone drives around with far more...
Edited on Thu Feb-19-09 10:29 AM by DCKit
than it would take to kill them.

The S.O. and I have a running joke: All the cars that explode three (or more) times in movies are American made, the others are cheesy imports and only ever explode once, if at all.

On Edit:

The higher the temperature, the more efficient heat exchange becomes. It's science and I think they understand the risks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sirveri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-21-09 01:34 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. that's not necessarily true. It does provide higher carnot efficiency though.
It all depends on the effiency and losses to entropy., however a higher carnot value is more likely to produce a more efficient cycle. All said and done it doesn't take into account maintenance costs and how they would impact $/kwh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-09 03:54 PM
Response to Original message
15. Debunked.
"With molten salt energy storage electricity can be generated at night. Biello tells us how much electricity Andasol 1 produces - 50 MWs - the number of hours it can produce electricity - 7.5 - and its cost - $380 million. But then something goes very wrong in Biello's account. Solar Millennium AG, Andasol'sbuilder acknowledges that Andasol is currently remunerated with a feed-in tariff of just under € 0.27/kWh.

That is $0.34 a KWh. Indeed capital cost of the Andasol 1 facility is $7600 per KW, a 50% priemium over thye current high end estimate of the cost of conventional nuclear power.

Biello does not reveal this shocking cost to his readers. instead he inserts a completely misleading statement from National Renewables Energy Laboratory engineer Greg Glatzmaier suggesting that "Electricity from a solar-thermal power plant costs roughly 13 cents a kilowatt-hour, according to both with and without molten salt storage systems". This is of course utter nonsense, as anyone who would make the effort to check on the cost and generating capacity of recently constructed or proposed solar facilities."

http://nucleargreen.blogspot.com/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 02:58 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC