Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Greenpeace & Senator Sanders: How to Solve Global Warming for Half the Cost and Twice the Jobs …

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
OKIsItJustMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-12-09 04:54 PM
Original message
Greenpeace & Senator Sanders: How to Solve Global Warming for Half the Cost and Twice the Jobs …
Edited on Thu Mar-12-09 05:07 PM by OKIsItJustMe
http://www.greenpeace.org/usa/press-center/releases2/blueprint-cuts-u-s-co2-pollut

Greenpeace & Senator Sanders: How to Solve Global Warming for Half the Cost and Twice the Jobs as Dirty Energy

March 11, 2009

WASHINGTON — U.S. Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT), Greenpeace, the European Renewable Energy Council (EREC), and Dr. Joseph Romm of the Center for American Progress today released a report commissioned from the German Aerospace Center (the German equivalent of NASA) that shows how the United States can meet the energy needs of a growing economy and achieve science-based cuts in global warming pollution – without nuclear power or coal. The report, entitled “Energy evolution,” is co-authored by Greenpeace and EREC and includes a foreword by Dr. R.K. Pachauri, chairman of the Nobel Prize-winning Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).

The report finds that off-the-shelf clean energy technology can cut U.S. carbon dioxide emissions from fossil fuels by at least 23 percent from current levels by 2020 and 85 percent by 2050 (equal to a 12 percent cut by 2020 and an 83 percent cut by 2050 from 1990 levels) – at half the cost and double the job-creation of what it would take to meet U.S. energy needs with dirty energy sources.

Throughout, the study makes conservative assumptions to ensure the real-world viability of the scenario. The report assumes that only currently available technologies will be used and no appliances or power plants will be retired prematurely, and adopts the same projections for population and economic growth included in the International Energy Agency’s World Energy Outlook.

“Every day that we don’t deal with the crisis of global warming, it’s only going to get worse, it’s only going to get more costly, there’s only going to be more damage to our environment,” Sanders said. “This report shows that we can address climate change while improving our economy. The time is now to move forward aggressively on energy efficiency and creating new sustainable energy and millions of good-paying jobs in the process.”

Based on the IPCC’s findings, developed countries as a group must reduce emissions by at least 25-40 percent below 1990 levels by 2020 to minimize the risk of the worst impacts of global warming. In addition to the domestic emissions reductions in the energy sector, the Energy evolution provides guidance on how the United States can achieve the IPCC’s targets by financing clean technology in the developing world.


http://www.greenpeace.org/raw/content/usa/press-center/reports4/energy-r-evolution-a-sustain.pdf">Download the report
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Ghost Dog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-12-09 05:34 PM
Response to Original message
1. step one: use energy smarter
The fastest, cheapest, and most effective way to cut global warming
emissions is to simply reduce energy use. By deploying currently
available energy efficiency technologies, the U.S. can dramatically
cut global warming emissions while at the same time saving
consumers and businesses money. Additionally, these savings act like
a massive economy-wide tax cut, stimulating further economic
growth and job creation

For example, consider the tremendous potential for emission
reductions through energy efficiency in home heating and cooling,
which accounts for almost half of home energy use.10 Drafty
windows, poor insulation, and other air leaks waste vast amounts of
energy. In fact, the Department of Energy’s home weatherization
program cuts energy use for heating and cooling by an average of
30 percent per home.11 By expanding this program nationwide, the
U.S. could cut household energy use by 30 percent nationally and
save $1.50 for every dollar invested. Similarly dramatic
improvements are currently available from super-efficient air
conditioners, water heaters, and appliances.

/... download the report (52-page .pdf)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bananas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-12-09 10:36 PM
Response to Original message
2. Announced by Joe Romm on climateprogress.org a few days ago.
I didn't see this, thanks for posting.

http://climateprogress.org/2009/03/09/press-breakfast-greenpeace/

Media advisory: Press breakfast Wed. March 11 with Sen. Sanders, Greenpeace, and me in DC

***Wednesday, March 11TH, 9:00 am***

Greenpeace Report: How to Solve Global Warming for Half the Cost and Twice the Jobs as Dirty Energy

Blueprint Cuts U.S. Energy Pollution 85% by 2050 without Nuclear Power or Coal

<snip>

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
excess_3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-12-09 10:50 PM
Response to Original message
3. better solution --> the electric car .n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Oct 17th 2024, 11:30 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC