Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Let Them Eat Rocket Fuel

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
doodadem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-01-05 02:18 PM
Original message
Let Them Eat Rocket Fuel
Edited on Tue Feb-01-05 04:37 PM by Skinner
Let Them Eat Rocket Fuel
Erik D. Olson
January 27, 2005


The fact that there's a rocket fuel additive called perchlorate in your water is bad enough. What's worse is the fact that the Bush administration likely manipulated the National Academy of Sciences to designate a lax perchlorate standard. The National Resources Defense Council sued the White House, Defense Department and EPA to release documents relating to perchlorate contamination and the NAS. What they found was evidence of an elaborate campaign designed to downplay the hazards of a dangerous chemical.

Erik D. Olsen is a senior attorney at the National Resources Defense Council specializing in safe drinking water issues. He is the national coordinator of the Campaign for Safe and Affordable Drinking Water, a coalition of more than 300 public interest groups dedicated to improved drinking water protection.

More than 20 million Americans have rocket fuel in their drinking water. That’s right. Rocket fuel. It’s also likely in your milk. And in your lettuce, too, because farmers out West inadvertently use rocket-fuel-contaminated water to irrigate their crops.

You might not think that’s a good thing. Scientists at the Environmental Protection Agency didn’t, either. Especially since a toxic salt in rocket fuel, called perchlorate, can harm the thyroid and may disrupt fetal and newborn brain development. In 2002, EPA proposed a safe level in drinking water of only 1 part per billion. That’s equivalent to half a teaspoon of perchlorate in an Olympic-size swimming pool. The Pentagon and its contractors—who have polluted food and drinking water across the country—argued that 200 parts per billion is safe.

EDITED BY ADMIN: COPYRIGHT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
seriousstan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-01-05 02:21 PM
Response to Original message
1. You forgot the link
the mods will lock a thread without a link.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wilms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-01-05 02:48 PM
Response to Original message
2. Here we are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
doodadem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-01-05 03:05 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Whoops!
Edited on Tue Feb-01-05 03:09 PM by doodadem
Thanks Wilms!
This is another thing that I'm very glad to see Barbara Boxer going after in our state.
I have a friend that is pretty sure her major thyroid problems came from when she was living amongst a bunch of defense contracting manufacturers in the midwest. My parents still live in that same area, and amazingly, they've both been diagnosed with cancer this past year.
Perchlorate is nasty, nasty, invasive stuff.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wilms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-01-05 03:07 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. No problem.
Just be sure to limit the snips to 4 paragraphs, as per DU Rules.

I messed that one up a few days back.

Welcome :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Igel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-01-05 02:56 PM
Response to Original message
3. It's probably the next arsenic scare.
No safe level determined, widespread, no way to identify where a lot of the perchlorate comes from ... but everybody'll have to find a way to make sure their little town's water purification system meets the standards.

http://www.mindfully.org/Water/2003/Perchlorate-Mystery-Texas2oct03.htm
http://www.mindfully.org/Food/2003/Perchlorate-Texas-Milk25sep03.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_Tires Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-01-05 03:03 PM
Response to Original message
4. General Ripper warned us about this a LONG time ago!
lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkofos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-01-05 03:10 PM
Response to Original message
7. Shouldn't that be
Let them drink rocket fuel??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ezlivin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-01-05 03:12 PM
Response to Original message
8. Silly rabbit! Trix is supposed to be flammable
No need to turn on the lights for breakfast when your cereal can light up the table and put you into orbit.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KissMeKate Donating Member (741 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-01-05 03:29 PM
Response to Original message
9. our food supply is contaminated top to botom
organics help, but we need to demand safer food from ALL of our elected officials.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hnsez Donating Member (430 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-01-05 03:31 PM
Response to Original message
10. some facts about Perchlorate - its not as bad as alot of other stuff, but
Edited on Tue Feb-01-05 03:41 PM by hnsez
Percholorate (PCE) has been used in rocket fuel and pyrotechnics for decades. The people who worked with it and have gotten exposed to large quantities of it had decreased thyroid function BUT there was little or no other effect observed. For decades PCE was given to people who suffered from a hyperactive thyroid gland in doses of up to 1 gram per day. When their doses were halted the thyroid returned to its previous level of hormone production. No other major health issues were reported.

The standard used by the EPA was based on rodent studies and they developed disease that has not been seen in the humans who were exposed to similar levels per Kg of body weight. Obviously humans have enzymes or other means or breaking the PCE down.

There are much worse things in our environment than PCE for example Bush has been criminally negligent in the develoment of mercury emissions standards from power plants.

That said I disagree with the raising of the standard because the effects on infants have not been studied adequately. Some people may be unusually sensitive to it if they lack the means to break it down. Remember gulf war syndrome? Just because it is safe for 9,999 people, what if you are that 1 person who is 1000 times more sensitive to it? The incidence of this has not been studied with respect to PCE.

Bush is the worst president I have ever seen in terms of stopping / halting important scientific research that is necessary to make fully informed public policy decisions. I am not at all personally worried about PCE in the drinking water at levels up to the new standard but it is unimaginable to me that the standard was raised without completing the scientific research necessary to determine the impact on infants. It is horrific that this administration puts profit ahead of the health of our nations most vulnerable people, the newly born.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNadir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-01-05 08:18 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. I wrote about this horrible, horrible tragedy on another website.
Edited on Tue Feb-01-05 08:18 PM by NNadir
Here's the link:

http://www.smirkingchimp.com/viewtopic.php?topic=51631&forum=3

My post, the threadkiller apparently, which I am too depressed even to think about or to repeat, is the last one, number 18.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-02-05 12:58 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Thanks for the explanation
I seemed to recall from the hazy depths of my chemistry knowledge that perchlorate had other sources.

The upshot of NNadir's lengthy and well-researched post to Smirking Chimp is that perchlorate can be formed from many sources, among them the mixing of chlorine, such as that found in municipal water supplies, with ozone. It's not a "natural" source, but nevertheless a plausible source that does not involve widespread pollution on the part of defence contractors.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 08:44 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC