Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama's EPA clears 42 of 48 new mountaintop removal mining permits

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
SHRED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-18-09 07:07 AM
Original message
Obama's EPA clears 42 of 48 new mountaintop removal mining permits

"Change"?

:mad: :mad: :mad:

Obama's EPA clears 42 of 48 new mountaintop removal mining permits
The Obama administration has cleared more than three-dozen new mountaintop removal permits for issuance by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, drawing quick criticism from environmental groups who had hoped the new president would halt the controversial practice.
By Ken Ward Jr.
Staff writer

CHARLESTON, W.Va. -- The Obama administration has cleared more than three-dozen new mountaintop removal permits for issuance by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, drawing quick criticism from environmental groups who had hoped the new president would halt the controversial practice.

http://wvgazette.com/News/200905150759?page=1&build=cache

--
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
elleng Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-18-09 07:09 AM
Response to Original message
1. The RULES have to change.
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MercutioATC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-18-09 09:29 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. Exactly
People expect the EPA to stop issuing legal permits just because we have a different President?

The rules have to change before mining changes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YankeyMCC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-18-09 09:41 AM
Response to Reply #1
7. I understand yet


the EPA like most (not counting defense) government agencies are really strapped for people and resources. Couldn't they have found a way to delay long enough on more of these for them to get a rule change or at least ensure there was some other mechanism in place - perhaps through a different agency - to delay further.

There are a lot of long term project that will require some back and forth but mountain top removal is about an immediate ecological problem as you can get.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Triana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-18-09 08:03 AM
Response to Original message
2. WTF?!?!
:wtf:
:grr:
:mad:
:wtf:
:grr:
:mad:
:wtf:
:grr:
:mad:
:wtf:
:grr:
:mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
montanacowboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-18-09 08:15 AM
Response to Original message
3. The more things change
the more they stay the same

sickening
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-18-09 08:32 AM
Response to Original message
4. "grand hotel,always the same...
people come,people go

nothing ever happens"

the democratic debates were sponsored by big coal. obama has always backed big coal since the day he was elected in illinois.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YankeyMCC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-18-09 09:40 AM
Response to Original message
6. replied in wrong spot
Edited on Mon May-18-09 09:41 AM by YankeyMCC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nihil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-19-09 06:51 AM
Response to Original message
8. "Change you can believe in"
Clap harder! Clap harder!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 07:46 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC