Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Imperial Oil Moving Forward With $7 Billion+ Plan For New Tar Sands Development - NYT

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 12:20 PM
Original message
Imperial Oil Moving Forward With $7 Billion+ Plan For New Tar Sands Development - NYT
Imperial Oil, Exxon’s Canadian subsidiary, has broken the oil sands investment slump with an announcement on Monday that the company will proceed with a $7.1 billion project to mine bitumen from the Kearl Lake project, located about 44 miles northeast of Fort McMurray, Alberta.

Imperial says the Kearl project, which is expected to operate for half a century, will eventually yield a daily average of 300,000 barrels of bitumen — a thick, sticky substance that can be processed into fuel oil. Site preparation actually began last year, and the mining operation will commence in 2012.

Federal and provincial officials reviewed the Kearl Lake proposal in 2006, and a joint panel issued a favorable recommendation in 2007, with the caveat that the company undertake various remediation measures.

Last year, four environmental organizations, including the Sierra Club of Canada and the Pembina Institute, challenged that decision in federal court. “I don’t think there’s enough time being spent by federal regulators or Alberta regulators in actually making sure they know how to manage the landscape at the end of the day,” said Sean Nixon, the lawyer representing the environment groups, in an interview with the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation.

EDIT

http://greeninc.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/05/26/oil-sands-project-moves-forward/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
imdjh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-27-09 12:32 PM
Response to Original message
1. by fuel oil, I'm assuming that they mean it can't be used for gasoline
So this would free up some of the oil being used to heat homes. I used to have oil heat and it was much better than the electric I have now. I used 100 gallons per year, at 86¢/gallon and that's in Florida. I can only imagine what people in Montana use and when diesel was over $4/gallon it had to be a hit.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 07:41 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC