Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

EU Abandons Post-Kyoto CO2 Targets - Guardian

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-10-05 10:51 PM
Original message
EU Abandons Post-Kyoto CO2 Targets - Guardian
The European Union yesterday abandoned its leading role in fighting climate change by refusing to set targets for reductions in greenhouse gases after the first stage of the Kyoto protocol in 2012.
The decision by the European commission, designed to put pressure on President Bush to sign up the US to Kyoto during his visit to Brussels on February 22, is a blow to Tony Blair's strategy of making climate change a priority of the UK's presidency of the G8 industrialised countries - and the EU in the second half of this year.

The issue was not discussed during yesterday's talks between senior EU members and US secretary of state, Condoleezza Rice - with Stavros Dimas, the environment commissioner, being accused by green campaigners of dropping the EU's pace-setter role. Mr Dimas made plain the EU wanted the United States, China, Russia, India, Japan and Canada, which together account for 75% of emissions, to sign up for stronger commitments to fighting climate change before it showed its hand later this year. China has not signed up to Kyoto, which comes into force next week.

EDIT

Green MEPs urged the EU summit next month to set a target of cutting greenhouse gases by at least 30% by 2030 while WWF said this should be achieved by 2020, arguing that the impact would, according to the commission's own cost-benefit analysis, cut GDP by just 0.5-1.5% over 20 years. Mr Dimas said the 25-member EU's share of global emissions would fall to less than 10% over coming decades while developing countries would account for more than half, so even a 50% EU cut would not substantially affect climate change."

EDIT

http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/story/0,3604,1409449,00.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rfkrfk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-11-05 01:27 PM
Response to Original message
1. The story mentions aviation
Tax on jet fuel, for international flight,
is zero, by treaty.
Tax on jet fuel {US} for domestic flight,
is four cents per gallon.
Kinda sad, that airline management thinks that
people who push a lawn mower for a living, are undertaxed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phantom power Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-11-05 01:35 PM
Response to Original message
2. I think this will backfire.
They're making the same blunder as the US Democrats. Bush will just cite this as "proof" that "Kyoto was flawed", and/or "nobody else cares about CO2 either".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Nov 03rd 2024, 08:32 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC