Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Small Is Better: Big Houses Are Out and Downsizing Is In

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-29-09 06:37 AM
Original message
Small Is Better: Big Houses Are Out and Downsizing Is In
via AlterNet:



Small Is Better: Big Houses Are Out and Downsizing Is In

By Kristin Bender, E Magazine. Posted May 29, 2009.

With economic and environmental factors colliding, tiny houses are suddenly becoming the biggest rage.



It all traced back to two summers spent living in a 100-square-foot canvas yurt on an ashram in New York. (A yurt is a tent-like dwelling built around a circular frame that was first used by sheep-herding nomads in central Asia; an ashram is a place of religious retreat.) The experience left Chase Rogers convinced that she was ready to join the growing number of people nationwide who are downsizing for the sake of saving money, minimizing energy use and reducing their carbon footprint.

"You could  stretch your arms out and touch the walls,'' says Rogers, 40. "What I realized was that I didn't need that much. What was important to me was nature -- preserving it, and being near it." Rogers grew up in a sprawling 10-room home in the upscale community of Greenwich, Connecticut, and was living in a 2,300-square-foot home in New York when she moved to the ashram.

"I had all the material things and all this space but something was missing," says the writer and graphic designer. "I got rid of all the things and had less space and I realized I didn't need that much to be happy."

She's not alone. A growing number of people in the U.S. are downsizing their homes in response to the collapse of the housing market, rising energy prices and concern for the environment. The trend has long moved in the opposite direction, with the average American home size, about 2,500 square feet, up 140% from the 1950s. ..............(more)

The complete piece is at: http://www.alternet.org/environment/139839/small_is_better%3A_big_houses_are_out_and_downsizing_is_in/




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Ganja Ninja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-29-09 06:59 AM
Response to Original message
1. 100 Sq Ft is pretty small.
850 to 1000 would be good enough for a 2 bedroom 1 & 1/2 bath. But even at that size most people still need a garage for storage.

There's some nice examples here: http://www.countryplans.com/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-29-09 07:46 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. What do you mean? 100 Sq. Ft. is a perfectly good size
for a bathroom.

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-29-09 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. But not a kitchen!
x(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-29-09 04:14 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. I suppose you could wash the dishes in the shower.
And store them under the bed. But where would the microwave go?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-29-09 04:24 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Not to be rude
but with my fat ass, I'd be sleeping in the shower. :o
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-29-09 04:48 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. LOL! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TreasonousBastard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-30-09 03:53 PM
Response to Original message
7. Assholes have been living in yurts and tiny huts for years...
but no one else is getting the hint. It's kind of a neat trick to fit yourself and your limited amount of stuff in a 100 square feet, but even where the zoning laws alllow it, nobody really wants to.

Around here the houses are still getting bigger and bigger and McMansions are becoming the rule instead of the exception. Some prick tore down a perfectly nice house next door to me and is putting up a new one about three times the size of the original-- it's OK, though, according to the town, because it's all on the original floorplan.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
happyslug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-31-09 02:53 AM
Response to Original message
8. This place for sale in Bedford County Pa
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 07:26 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC