Wow. What a surprise.
RIO DE JANEIRO, Feb. 12 - "To the dismay of environmental groups here and abroad, the Brazilian government has restored logging licenses that were suspended last year as part of an effort to impede deforestation in frontier areas of the Amazon where the jungle is rapidly vanishing. The turnabout came after loggers and their allies blocked a major highway through the heart of the jungle and a large tributary of the Amazon River, burned buses, and threatened to pollute waterways with chemicals and seize an airport.
Environmental groups described the government's unexpected policy change as a setback to conservation efforts in the Amazon and said it would only encourage further lawlessness in an area already noted for violence.
"Giving in to blackmail is always a dangerous precedent, and I think that is the case here," said Adriana Ramos of the Socio-Environmental Institute, a leading research and advocacy group. "Before long, somebody else appears, also wanting to unilaterally force negotiations, so it is important that the government not weaken the implementation of the law."
This dispute is the latest of several since Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva and the left-leaning Workers' Party took office two years ago in which the government has bowed to organized acts of civil disobedience. Ranchers, rice growers and farmers who blocked highways last year to prevent the establishment of an Indian reservation in the northern Amazon also got their way, and landless peasants regularly invade and occupy farms with no legal action taken against them. On Jan. 27, the senior environmental inspector in the eastern Amazon state of Para vowed that the government "will not cave in to blackmail." But when the leader of the loggers' association was quoted as warning that "blood will flow" unless his group's demands were met, and business and political leaders in towns along the blockaded BR-163 highway complained that supplies were running short and normal commerce was grinding to a halt, officials in Brasília apparently had second thoughts."
EDIT
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/02/13/international/americas/13amazon.html?