Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Shell oil gets conditional permission to drill in the Beaufort Sea

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
pscot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-20-09 09:54 PM
Original message
Shell oil gets conditional permission to drill in the Beaufort Sea
http://www.adn.com/money/industries/oil/story/979077.html

----
The federal Minerals Management Service said it will allow Shell to drill for oil and gas in the far western area of Camden Bay, west of Kaktovik, if certain conditions are met. For the project to go forward, it must comply with state and federal environmental requirements and Shell needs to obtain a drill permit from MMS, the service announced Monday.

Shell is also seeking permission to drill one or two wells on its leases in the Chukchi Sea next year. Alaska Native organizations and environmentalists have sued to block the drilling, and under court order, the MMS is revising its analysis of the company's plans for its Chukchi leases.

National environmental groups said the latest decision ignores threats to the Arctic environment and its wildlife, and at least one of them said a lawsuit challenging it was likely.

MMS officials said Monday they are committed to responsible development.

"Now that we have approved Shell's plan and reached this important milestone we will continue to work with Shell to ensure that all activities are conducted in a safe and environmentally responsible manner," said MMS Director Liz Birnbaum.
-----
Shell said it plans to drill two wells between July and October on its Camden Bay leases, and hasn't decided yet whether to pursue additional drilling in the Beaufort in future years. The company agreed to suspend drilling and take its vessels out of the area in August during the fall subsistence bowhead whale hunts by two villages, Kaktovik and Nuiqsut.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Arctic Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-20-09 10:18 PM
Response to Original message
1. Obama admin is throwing Sen. Begich a bone.
If they would have shut down all the plans Begich be bounced out after his first term.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pscot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-21-09 10:46 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Seems a little premature
Since Begich won't be running again for 5 years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arctic Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-21-09 02:06 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Not really considering the wingers up here are going nuts over anything with D in front
of their name. Uncle Ted has already been making the rounds trying to get support for a comeback. If Mark doesn't get ahead of the game democratic alaskans will lose out. Shell was going to drill eventually no matter what, it might as well be on our terms and not theirs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Braulio Donating Member (860 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-21-09 06:40 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Sounds like a good idea to drill offshore
I don't see what's the big deal, why not let them drill offshore? The state of Alaska and the Federal government can collect taxes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
angryfirelord Donating Member (248 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-21-09 06:58 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. The oil doesn't go directly to us
That's the main problem with the "drill drill drill" chant is that even if we did open up all offshore drilling and ANWR, the price of oil is a global commodity. If we were able to extract oil tomorrow, there's certainly not enough to make any kind of significant dent in the price of oil.

Although if push comes to shove, I would rather see offshore drilling compared to trying to get oil out of tar sands and shale.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Braulio Donating Member (860 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-21-09 08:04 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. The oil doesn't have to go directly to you
I think it's a very simple idea: oil companies drill, and if they find the oil, they spend money to develop it and produce it. Their profits are taxed, and the activities generate employment. It's not too complicated, is it? As for tar sands and shale, if it's done properly, why not do it? It allows for economic activity as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arctic Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-21-09 07:28 PM
Response to Reply #4
6.  Drilling offshore has a lot of problems. Both enviromentally and culturally.
Of course they have been drilling offshore and producing for a while already.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Braulio Donating Member (860 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-21-09 08:05 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. What exactly is your objection?
I would like to know what are the environmental problems you think exist. As for cultural problems, what's the deal? Alaskans seem to like drilling the oil. It's a way of life for them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arctic Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-21-09 08:25 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. I don't think they exist, I know they exist. Since I've been working in the oilfield
in the arctic, both onshore and offshore, and when they start with this project I will be working with them just like I did with BP, PNR and ENI. As for Alaskan are for drilling, we are, to a point. If it is good for us. As for the people who actually live were they want drill it is really in their best interest to make sure it is done in the absolutely most safe way possible since they are extremely dependent on subsistance living.
Now in my view if it's between the native population losing their way of living and someone needing cheap gas for their SUV or Or ATV I will always side with the natives.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pscot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-21-09 10:19 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. It's a way of life in Louisiana too
and the state has all kinds of environmental problems as a result. An oil spill or a well blow-out in the pack ice would be devastating environmentally and would be impossible to clean up. If you don't think that matters, then we don't have much to talk about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Dec 21st 2024, 07:35 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC